FujiVice
Full Member
- Joined
- May 8, 2013
- Messages
- 7,828
There's a thread on the main page discussing it. Nothing certain, but enough hints to worthy a discussion about it. Our reps are currently in KSA now.is this actually credible?
There's a thread on the main page discussing it. Nothing certain, but enough hints to worthy a discussion about it. Our reps are currently in KSA now.is this actually credible?
If the Glazers had no interest in selling we wouldn't be sending reps to Saudi, it'd be a polite 'no thanks' over the phone. There's clearly a conversation going on.Basically nothing to report. We all know United delegation are there but no one actually knows whether a sale will be discussed.
I'm guessing we will hear more over the weekend as this event they have gone to, is over 3 days.
There is clearly an event going on in SA with thousands of businessmen. Don't get your hopes up about a genocidal regime just yet.If the Glazers had no interest in selling we wouldn't be sending reps to Saudi, it'd be a polite 'no thanks' over the phone. There's clearly a conversation going on.
Are Saudi the only country that carries out Ill conceived military interventions then?There is clearly an event going on in SA with thousands of businessmen. Don't get your hopes up about a genocidal regime just yet.
Trump would love to have you in his anti-impeachment movement.Are Saudi the only country that carries out Ill conceived military interventions then?
Are Saudi the only country that carries out Ill conceived military interventions then?
I don't see the equivalency there at all and I'm more than a little irked at the insinuation that I'm some kind of right winger. I'm not.Trump would love to have you in his anti-impeachment movement.
If you class running the club as a method to sportswash the Saudi public image while continuing a murderous human rights policy. Then yes, they are altruistic.I don't see the equivalency there at all and I'm more than a little irked at the insinuation that I'm some kind of right winger. I'm not.
I
it was back in the days before the glazers bought the club and this was being floated then obviously I'd be be opposed as well. The current reality though is that we're well past that point now. Whatever you think of the Saudis their intentions towards the club are altruistic, they'll run it as a rich kids hobby. The current owners intentions are as far from altruistic as it's possible to get. They view us as a trust fund nest egg and nothing more.
Am I comfortable with Yemen, the journalist who was murdered or that Bin Salman has half his relatives under guard? No obviously not. But the politics side of things will never come near the club. We won't suddenly become a little part of Saudi Arabia because the owners don't run their own country in a way we would like our own western liberal society to be run. Solskjaer isn't going to vanish from the Saudi embassy if we're on a losing streak. Bin Salman will be a passing footnote in the club's history and won't negatively impact the club's day to day running like the Glazers do.
Oh? I thought just a few months ago He said everything is fine and We should trust the players? wait a minute, it's the parrot man! of course He changes his tune every time.
Can't watch so what's he saying?Oh? I thought just a few months ago He said everything is fine and We should trust the players? wait a minute, it's the parrot man! of course He changes his tune every time.
Nothing He said that We didn't know about.
Can't watch so what's he saying?
Thanks.He's not saying anything new. Someone has just made a compilation video with old quotes from him. Not significant whatsoever from Neville's part. Seems though the fan has made this video to highlight the Glazer's shortcomings, which by the way I agree with.
Their father stumbled on something that worked, find a man extremely good at what he does and give him the freedom to do his thing. Malcom Glazer did it with Fergie now his kids need to do it with someone else because we haven't suffered because we lacked investment we have declined because we lack direction. A manager's job is too dependent on results to be entrusted with a long term project so they now need to identify a top DOF and agree on a vision they can afford then give him the room to build a team that can achieve such a vision.Glazers and Woodward are here to stay for a good while yet, unless they stumble on something that works by luck we’re going to be shot for a good while yet.
Perfect unlike Woodward who wants to be the Alpha and Omega at United. One week he briefs that he doesn't make football decisions and another he briefs that he wanted to sign Varane and Verrati for Jose which Jose declined. Isn't that contradictory? And, by the way, Jose was right to refuse to partake in a fool's errand.
The Saudi journalist that wrote the article in June trying to convince the Saudi Investment Fund to buy Manchester United just tweeted this:
The Saudi journalist that wrote the article in June trying to convince the Saudi Investment Fund to buy Manchester United just tweeted this:
Is he someone important with regards to a sale? fecking hell, not the Saudis
No, in fact its the opposite. He wanted to sanction sales but Mourinho declined so he didn't. At least in this scenario it is Woodward leaving the decision to the football people.Perfect unlike Woodward who wants to be the Alpha and Omega at United. One week he briefs that he doesn't make football decisions and another he briefs that he wanted to sign Varane and Verrati for Jose which Jose declined. Isn't that contradictory? And, by the way, Jose was right to refuse to partake in a fool's errand.
We need him out and get in a new CEO who knows what he is doing and his limitations. Getting rid of Woodward will solve like 50% of our problems.