lefty_jakobz
I ❤️ moses
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Messages
- 3,648
Since when? Or are you just spouting?
Just spouting
Since when? Or are you just spouting?
What’s with the fecking sarcasm? It’s just a question and I wondered if there was a view on it.You think? No one's ever made the point before...
It's clear the rats are worried the ship is sinking but are nowhere near ready to jump. The United fanbase that is not clueless on this need to make sure they do.
Yeah, you’re probably right. Like I said, I’m probably just clutching but let’s hope there is an element of truth to the theory.it might be connected but I doubt it’s because they think it won’t be a problem soon
more likely they fear we’ll miss out on UCL which impacts the selling price
Finishing mid table would be a disaster for any negotiations
Yeah, you’re probably right. Like I said, I’m probably just clutching but let’s hope there is an element of truth to the theory.
If you've read a couple of pages from the threads on Glazers out, you'd know your view is basically the main stream.What’s with the fecking sarcasm? It’s just a question and I wondered if there was a view on it.
I haven’t trawled through the thread and I haven’t seen anyone else mention it though I’m not stupid enough to think I’m the only one who would of mentioned it.If you've read a couple of pages from the threads on Glazers out, you'd know your view is basically the main stream.
If you didn't read anything and don't disclose, don't get annoyed when someone makes a bit of a joke out of it.
Whatever. If you came in a transfer thread 50 pages in and started posting 'insights' from two weeks ago, do you expect not to be laughed at?I haven’t trawled through the thread and I haven’t seen anyone else mention it though I’m not stupid enough to think I’m the only one who would of mentioned it.
You call it a joke, I call it it trying to make someone look like a cnut.
No, a simple “this has been mentioned before” etc but I suppose there’ll always be the smart posters around who try and belittle others from behind a keyboard, I guess they gotta get their kicks somehow.Whatever. If you came in a transfer thread 50 pages in and started posting 'insights' from two weeks ago, do you expect not to be laughed at?
Wind direction is everything.Like pissing in the wind.
Won’t change anything.
The second one won't happen - the Glazers have already maximised the return of United. Any new owner will need to invest heavily with the only upside winning some prize money. The cost of the purchase won't be offset by winning league titles and champions leagues. The only way to significantly improve returns is to come up with new revenue streams: super league, games abroad, change in TV deal structures (e.g. individual club streaming). And if any of those are on the cards, the Glazers are not going to miss the opportunity to be involved.Even if the Glazers withstand the current maelstrom, there's no way they'll retain control long-term.
Think about the big picture: do we really think they can take a community institution, beloved by billions of people, and turn it into a family asset against the will of practically everybody?
Sorry, that's just not sustainable.
Eventually one of two things will happen:
1. The fans become so bored of mediocrity that they decide to stop going to games and buying merch, causing the valuation to plummet.
2. Someone who sees the potential of the club comes along with an offer the owners can't refuse.
It might not be this year or even next year, but it will happen.
I know there is another march planned for the Arsenal game but you have to wonder if we go on a run this season and we're winning a lot of games do the protests lose momentum? I don't think they will ever fully go away now, there's been too much damage done. There's going to be a section of the fanbase that will always protest against them no matter how well we do on the pitch but I doubt we see the numbers we saw on Monday again if we're back in the top four and win silverware this season.There should be protests at every home game
The second one won't happen - the Glazers have already maximised the return of United. Any new owner will need to invest heavily with the only upside winning some prize money. The cost of the purchase won't be offset by winning league titles and champions leagues. The only way to significantly improve returns is to come up with new revenue streams: super league, games abroad, change in TV deal structures (e.g. individual club streaming). And if any of those are on the cards, the Glazers are not going to miss the opportunity to be involved.
So it leaves us with 1 above, basically we will need to become very very very shit before they will sell. And even then, look how Ashley held on to Newcastle after relegation.
Since last year.Since when? Or are you just spouting?
This is one thing that our fans don’t seem to realize. By stifling revenues we can cause a lot of problems for the Glazers with the debt holders and impact their dividends.I would not even rule out that we could be in breach of several loan covenants if we won't manage to get CL football next year.
Since last year.
Check out our financial reports. We are bleeding money as it is, our operating cash flow, basically the ability to earn money for transfers and other investments is down last year based on three quarters. And it probably will be even worse this year without Champions League. It is not enough for proper investment as well.
We already borrowed 100 mil to shore up our cash reserves. We have substantial transfer debt as well. We also pay interest of course and it's in dollars as well as the loans themselves and our revenue is more in euros and pounds that are declining of course.
So yeah, new loans are the only way the club can spend right now. We can take another 100 mil no problem, under the current cheap credit facility, but after that...
Given the current rate and the trend it's going it will be extremely expensive. I would not even rule out that we could be in breach of several loan covenants if we won't manage to get CL football next year. For example the Adidas will decline, we will need to invest more etc, etc.
It's not a financial disaster yet, but it is far from being the solid foundation it was 3-4 years ago. And COVID honestly not the main reason for that decline.
The club was sold to Fenway Sports Group during the 2010–11 season. Accounts had shown that Liverpool were £350 million in debt with losses of £55 million, causing auditor KPMG to qualify its audit opinion.The Royal Bank of Scotland who were the club's creditors, took owners Gillett and Hicks to court to force through a sale. The court ruled in the creditors' favour and the club was sold to Fenway Sports Group for £300 million on 15 October 2010.
At some point, banks will simply stop giving the Glazers any more loans because they are simply incapable of repaying the money. Whatever bank(s) has (have) become the club's creditor(s) can and should take the Glazers to court and force the sale.
Here is the summary on Wikipedia about what happened with Liverpool in 2010.
The question is whether or not we have to wait until the bank(s) put the Glazers' indebtedness into the toxic debt category before something happens. I hope we don't have to wait for things to get this bad before those leeches leave once and for all, but there will come a day when the creditor(s) will have had enough with the Glazers' financial shitness.