jlecesne
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2013
- Messages
- 571
I would like to see VAR evolve to a system where teams challenge calls/situations that the do not agree with. Tennis has the best review system. The umpire does not initiate a review on each close call. Players challenge calls that they don't agree with and they have a certain number of times they can be incorrect before they run out of challenges.
One example could be:
Now with every team getting 5 substitutions, those could be leveraged in the challenges. If a team feels a call is incorrect they can initiate VAR. If the call is changed in their favor, they keep all of their substitutions. If the call stands, they lose a substitution.
Reviewing every big call is getting time consuming and tedious. If it moves to a challenge system we will see less millimetre offside and nit picky reviews. Teams will only want to challenge if they feel they have a good chance of overturning the call on the field.
One example could be:
Now with every team getting 5 substitutions, those could be leveraged in the challenges. If a team feels a call is incorrect they can initiate VAR. If the call is changed in their favor, they keep all of their substitutions. If the call stands, they lose a substitution.
Reviewing every big call is getting time consuming and tedious. If it moves to a challenge system we will see less millimetre offside and nit picky reviews. Teams will only want to challenge if they feel they have a good chance of overturning the call on the field.