NoLogo
Full Member
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deloitte_Football_Money_League
United were top of the FML every season before the Glazers took control of the club.
The money the Glazers have cost the club's sporting operation is a fact, how the revenue would or would not have developed without them is speculation. But seeing as basically the whole industry, English clubs in particular, has experienced tremendous growth and United started their journey on top of it, it's a fairly ambitious statement to say the Glazer's management has created more than the extra billion or so they have cost the club.
I still maintain the view that our financial growth was directly tied to the success we had on the field during a time when the Chinese and US American market grew very rapidly, and I feel we would have similar success financially without the Glazers as well, as you pointed out we were pretty much a financial juggernaut even before the Glazers arrived here.
So yeah I totally agree with you, the case that Glazer apologists always make "but the financial growth is down to the Glazers" has very shaky legs to stand on if any and even if they did like a couple % better than we would have without them I'm not sure if that made up the 1.1bn GBP they drained from the club.
But we are derailing the thread and that's the last on the matter I'm going to post here.