May saying that there will be a cap but won't say what that cap will be, they're even making a bit of a pigs ear of their U-turn.
She even said the principles of the policy remain the same. That is a quote you'll see a lot in the next few weeks.If you can, watch this press conference
It's amazing, she is a complete mess
But, when it comes to leaders debate, not for turning up.The lady's all for turning.
This sums up my predicament in a nutshell.
he does answer with some small degree of nuance
it's quite a journey to the idea that he ''refuses to condemn the IRA''
it's not fair interviewing (altho she is careful to use the word 'unequivocally') & it isn't fair reporting of his answer
semantic stitch-up basically
So the policy is still a dementia tax, but it now has an uncosted cap (on what was an already uncosted manifesto).
What a complete shitshow of a u-turn
If there's a cap in that range then it won't really be a dementia tax.
Is this Cameron's legacy? Him looking like he wanted to lose in 2015 but unexpectedly winning has set the tone and now the Tories think that's the way to go?
She's got an interview with Andrew Neil tonight, I imagine they're scrambling to set a figure in time for that.
Good point, well made. Now back to Corbyn being a terrorist sympathiser.If the don't have some specifics, they've learnt nothing from this mess. There should have been a cap to begin with, morally and politically. This talk of a dementia tax though and the vigour with which some have pursued it, has been rather shameful IMO. Similar programmes are already in effect at the local level, enacted by Labour and Tory councils every week.
Good point, well made. Now back to Corbyn being a terrorist sympathiser.
It's basically just the higher Dilnot proposal (I'm pretty sure Corbyn has endorsed the lower 35k figure?) but with a higher bottom level of 100k. "Dementia tax" had potency when you could end up spending hundreds of thousands because of it. The cap element negates that. But the problem is, they haven't budgeted for it at all.How so? It still places the burden of the cost of social care on those who need it (eg dementia sufferers) rather than pooling the cost like the NHS. Or have I missed something? As I read it, they have just put a cap on the amount of 'dementia tax' one could pay.
It's basically just the higher Dilnot proposal (I'm pretty sure Corbyn has endorsed the lower 35k figure?) but with a higher bottom level of 100k. "Dementia tax" had potency when you could end up spending hundreds of thousands because of it. The cap element negates that. But the problem is, they haven't budgeted for it at all.
Going to be very interesting to see if the fundamentals on approval, best PM and economic credibility change on this, because it gets at all three.
Yeah that's true, can you picture the absolute state of CCHQ right now trying to figure out what's acceptable to their voters and what figure on their budget they can blagWell sort of, although until we have a ballpark on the potential cap it is a completely meaningless U-Turn (except, as you say, the damage to credibility). I mean for all we know the cap could be 100s of thousands.
This is actually a good idea
How so? It still places the burden of the cost of social care on those who need it (eg dementia sufferers) rather than pooling the cost like the NHS. Or have I missed something? As I read it, they have just put a cap on the amount of 'dementia tax' one could pay.
That's fantastic workMy bet on Corbyn is going well. Put £500 down last night and £571 to cashout already. Holding out for 100 quid. Just need Jezza to keep his mouth shut for about 24 hours and I'm sorted!
Edit: Just cashed it out for £116 profit. Cheers Jezza!