I repeat: I think it's a problem for your team, in its weekly endeavour to improve performances and results, if a legendary and highly influential ex-player does commentary and post-match punditry in the most relevant broadcast in such a way that he enriches every game's analysis with his holistic gripe with, and bitterness about, the clubs leadership and the entirety of recent history of what has gone wrong at the club.
It adds massive weight, like you wouldn't believe, in the sphere of public perception and atmosphere, onto the team's already heavy shoulders, and it makes it impossible for the new managerial team to receive anything like a clean slate, or the opportunity of a patient, calm fresh start. How hard is it to understand this?
And here is is completely IRRELEVANT whether what he's saying about the Glazers is right (I think it is). It's just about the frequency, occasion, and podium where he keeps saying it. He's punishing the team for something they're not culpable for.