Gambit
Desperately wants to be a Muppet
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2004
- Messages
- 31,056
I have no issues with getting Bale on loan. The guy can still turn it on and can be brilliant.
It'll still be an outlay of over £10m in wages when he'll likely spend good parts of it injured. Each transfer should be judged on its own merit but we've made plenty of these mistakes before and not just with Sanchez. If our scouting department can't identify anyone for the right wing other than Sancho and Bale then I'd rather spend 300k a week on a new department.
He could poison the mentality of his teammatesI'm curious - a legitimate question for anyone who is dead against it with every fibre of their being...
What is the actual worst thing that could happen if we got Bale for a year on loan?
I'm with you. I'd rather not see this go ahead.I refuse to be grouped together with them fickle fans. I have dully learned my lesson and rightly praying for this to never happen under any circumstances.
This is so far the best reason I have read not to sign Bale. Probably the only one I would take on board. Golf. injuries, quality, salary, Falcao, Bastian, Sanchez are all different situations.I don’t want a demotivated Bale anywhere near our young players. He is probably the worst influence on them right now and it won’t be worth a few goals he scores when he plays. The culture will descend back to the Schweinsteiger days is apathy. This group of players are just beginning to look like a team, throw a Bale in there and undo all the good things that happened culturally since Jose left.
Potentially just another wasted year. We’re stuck in this cycle of having poor transfer windows, starting poorly and scrambling for Champions League in the hope that will give us the means for a good transfer window. Then it just starts again. Ending up with Bale is just symbolic of us settling. As far as a short term option goes then it’s probably the best you get but we only buy time to start this shit all over again next summer.I'm curious - a legitimate question for anyone who is dead against it with every fibre of their being...
What is the actual worst thing that could happen if we got Bale for a year on loan?
Nonsense. Madrid ended up winning the league with a hard working side with Bale in the squad.He could poison the mentality of his teammates
He could poison the mentality of his teammates
Martial perhaps? Before that could argue Herrera / Blind but none of those were exactly unknown around Europe. The last true unknown that was a success was maybe Hernandez? Which is depressing.When was the last time our scouting department unearthed a gem that wasn't for the U18s?
So if he plays 20 games on a pay as you play what’s the problem?I just chuckled reading this post. You talking about injuries and assuming Bale won't be the one injured is hilarious
Bale would most likely long be in the physio room next to Jones before any of the other 3 succumb to injury therefore rendering your scenarios unlikely.
This is so far the best reason I have read not to sign Bale. Probably the only one I would take on board. Golf. injuries, quality, salary, Falcao, Bastian, Sanchez are all different situations.
Then sign Perisic if we must but this whole Sancho or Bale is an indictment to how poor our scouting is.It's not like ole hasn't loaned an experienced 30 year old to fill a gap. I love the change of culture and approach to be honest. Would do anything to sign sancho. But I don't see getting Bale on loan as against what we have been doing. If Glazers won't give ole the money this year to buy sancho. I can see him going for one of Bale or Perisic on loan. Rather that than signing someone like Brooks permanently.
Where has this pay as you play idea come from. He’s still got a contract with Real and therefore will be paid weekly and in full. Real will most likely pay for half of the contract, we can’t just pick and choose when we pay.So if he plays 20 games on a pay as you play what’s the problem?
Greenwood etc get a rest and we see less of a drop off to the other squad players
The alternative view perhaps would be that having a 3 times CL winner in the squad will inspire the younger players.
And allows to conserve funds for another bash at sancho next timePeople saying it’s crazy getting a guy on loan for a season at basically no risk, but want to spunk 40-50m on some player just because he’s a right-winger then have the cheek to say to others the don’t know a thing baffles me to be fair..
Bale on loan until the right signing comes along makes a lot more sense..
Where has this pay as you play idea come from. He’s still got a contract with Real and therefore will be paid weekly and in full. Real will most likely pay for half of the contract, we can’t just pick and choose when we pay.
Absolutely none of that had anything to do with Bale though when he played even less than a Hazard who wasn't even fit for the majority of the seasonNonsense. Madrid ended up winning the league with a hard working side with Bale in the squad.
If he plays up we will just send him back
Not really. We sign all our u18 gems to the academy.Martial perhaps? Before that could argue Herrera / Blind but none of those were exactly unknown around Europe. The last true unknown that was a success was maybe Hernandez? Which is depressing.
The alternative view perhaps would be that having a 3 times CL winner in the squad will inspire the younger players.
He isn’t just going to rediscover his explosive acceleration and power. That’s gone. He’s a desperate last minute Ighalo type option for the right wing, absolutely not what we need at all. He’s the total opposite of Sancho and would be yet another example of everything we did wrong before getting into this mess. We’re looking at the name rather than how they’d fit into the system.
For everyone saying it’s just a loan, it stops us bringing in the right player now. Let’s say we add Bale and I’ll be optimistic and say we also add a lb.That means next summer to challenge for something we would still need a starting RW, CB, DM and a FAR better option than Ighalo up top. There’s absolutely no chance we’re doing that in one summer, and people on here will justify it and say how you can’t possibly expect all that in one window so it’ll be 2 years before we actually have a squad capable of challenging. Our first choice right winger is available now and wants to come. Go and sodding get him.
It’s not hard - RM cover 50% of his salary. We agree to pay whatever but only if he’s fit to play. It is a chance for him to put himself in the shop window and prove people wrongWhere has this pay as you play idea come from. He’s still got a contract with Real and therefore will be paid weekly and in full. Real will most likely pay for half of the contract, we can’t just pick and choose when we pay.
4 time winner!
Yeah, exactly it could give us the perfect path to get Sancho next season and even again Bale could be amazing for us, no lose reallyAnd allows to conserve funds for another bash at sancho next time
If Sancho has even a good season I can't imagine him being any cheaper, but there'd be plenty more competition for his signature. We have a genuinely top talent that wants to sign for us and we've known his price all summer. If we've been bluffing or don't want to spend the money then who were 2nd/3rd choice when targets were discussed before the end of the season? If Bale has been our 2nd choice all along then they should all hang their heads in shame. If Bale is 5th choice due to the others no longer being available then why have we spent all summer pondering over Sancho when his fee was known in June?You are missing the point. Our first choice is still Sancho and we need him (if not this year, next year). We need a stop gap until we try again next year.
... So he didnt poision the mentality of his teammates?...Absolutely none of that had anything to do with Bale though when he played even less minutes than a Hazard who wasn't even fit for the majority of the season
Only Mariano and Asensio, who was also injured long term, played less minutes in attack for them last year and that's including a few teenagers who played regularly. He's been a non factor in their team since Zidane came back
Those are the reports. Remember we did the same with Sanchez? Real have two choices, keep him rotting in the bench and pay full wages or send him on loan and pay half wages.You think Madrid would accept sending him on loan and paying half his wages? Doubt it. Also doubt he would choose us if Tottenham come in for him
I thought there was maybe a report of that being possible. There’s no way he’d agree to that when he could just collect his full wages.It’s not hard - RM cover 50% of his salary. We agree to pay whatever but only if he’s fit to play. It is a chance for him to put himself in the shop window and prove people wrong
Then sign Perisic if we must but this whole Sancho or Bale is an indictment to how poor our scouting is.
Bale is literally everything against what Ole has been preaching. If we sign Bake then Ole loses all right to talk about attitude, culture and profile to fit this club.
Bale hit all the negative checks of a player we shouldn't go for especially in this new revamped culture we're trying to promote.
Regardless of the circumstances Bale has been disrespecting his current club for years now, shows no respect for his current boss and consequently his attitude is a show of respect to his fellow teammates. Someone who choses to sleep on the bench while his team is playing is a bad egg.
Someone who tells his boss to not bother selecting him because he won't come even if he isn't fancied by his boss is a bad egg.
Someone who goes around disrespecting his club(Wales, Golf, Madrid) all over the globe while still contracted to them is toxic.
Us willingly walking into that trainwreck, especially after Ole has talked and reiterated about not wanting bad eggs would be absolutely ridiculous.
To play golf?
Do you think if we did get him on loan, our manager would speak to him first to determine his commitment?
I would presume he’s been turning up to training, even if he’s not playing. What’s wrong with going and playing golf in your free time?
Do you think if we did get him on loan, our manager would speak to him first to determine his commitment?
I would presume he’s been turning up to training, even if he’s not playing. What’s wrong with going and playing golf in your free time?
Do you honestly believe that he'll accept such a deal. He'll want his fu salary covered one way or another. Hes been willing to sit on the bench wasting his career to collect big paychecks, he's not going to have an epiphany and stop that now.So if he plays 20 games on a pay as you play what’s the problem?
Greenwood etc get a rest and we see less of a drop off to the other squad players
Nobody will pay him full wages. I think he knows he needs to prove himself. There’s a negotiation to be madeThose are the reports. Remember we did the same with Sanchez? Real have two choices, keep him rotting in the bench and pay full wages or send him on loan and pay half wages.
I thought there was maybe a report of that being possible. There’s no way he’d agree to that when he could just collect his full wages.
I get your point but how many of the u18 gems are getting into the squad? Or did the youth overhaul happen too soon for that to really come into fruition yet? Chong perhaps counts.Not really. We sign all our u18 gems to the academy.
Theres no need to take big risks on young players when we have so many ourselves. It blocks the pathways to youngsters which is a huge selling point for us