Plant0x84
Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
“I’m still here you Catalan feckers…”
Similar to Carrick in his use of the ball in possession and hos defensive style out of it (more interceptions and reading the game than actual tackles) but that's were the similarities end for me.
Frenkie is a lot quicker, much better dribbler and more press resistant. He also goes wandering a lot more than Carrick so won't always be there to protect the back 4
The white shirt probably symbolises the white flag: Barcelona are about to surrender and pay him the 17m.Interesting that he's used pictures with the colour red in them...
Weird, his way of saying he's a barca player?
Look at the comments! Deluded feckers telling him to leave - the fans are turning already!Weird, his way of saying he's a barca player?
I think we're talking the same thing really. He will earn £X million in total over the remainder of his contract, whether it's more in year 3, 4 or 5 is kind of irrelevant.I understood the current situation differently. I don't know the numbers exactly but it will be enough to bring the point across.
FDJ sat on a wage package of 60 million for 5 years. 10 million per year plus a stepped loyality bonus, 1 million after the first year, 2 after the second, 3 after the third, 4 after the fourth
(10+1)+(10+2)+(10+3)+(10+4)+10=60
As the virus hit he agreed to change his contract in a way, that his wage package stayed the same in total but the payments were structured differently. For example like this:
(6+1)+(6+2)+(13+3)+(13+3)+13=60
So if there are no other clauses involved in FDJ contract, and he would be transfered in his third year, than he would "lose" out the increased earnings of the fourth and fifth year.
I know the numbers aren't correct, but that is how I understood the situation, which would also be an explanation of why Barca seems intent not to pay him the defered wages, as they are simply not due. The player could sit out his contract to receive the full wage package. But if he wants to go out early, he misses the benefits.
One point seems pretty clear, he seems pretty badly advised legally and economically, if that is the case.
Just wait till they’re back in Barcelona. Laporta will probably get someone to constantly puncture FDJ’s tires so he’s late for training, then fine him 2 weeks wages.
Fickle fans... then again, he's an outsider so to speak isn't heLook at the comments! Deluded feckers telling him to leave - the fans are turning already!
No, just some generic match action shots posted by his management.Weird, his way of saying he's a barca player?
YepNo, just some generic match action shots posted by his management.
Well yes, but in his eyes, he may feel that he is owed what the original contract said so 10+1 + 10+2 = 23. But with the new contract he only received 6+1 + 6+2 = 15, so it isn't entirely irrelevant when some payment is due. But not sure, if I understood your point correctly.I think we're talking the same thing really. He will earn £X million in total over the remainder of his contract, whether it's more in year 3, 4 or 5 is kind of irrelevant.
He wouldn't want to be on less over the next few years by moving to us, especially when in his eyes (if not legally) he's already earnt most of it.
I like the way you thinkNo, just some generic match action shots posted by his management.
They are obviously trying to push him out with comments like these his manager is clearly telling him he isn’t in his plans in midfield
It becomes an issue though when your club openly agrees to sell you, moves you from your favourite position, puts you on the bench and then publicly tells you you’re seen as a centre half despite them buying two new centre halves this summer.
It obvious what’s going on here
No white text?
I think he’s just toeing a line… hi everyone, I’m happy to stay if that’s what happens. Play me anywhere, I’m fine.Weird, his way of saying he's a barca player?
They had Mascherano, one of the best DM in the world at that time, to play CB. If that's the position his manager has for him, a position that he had play before, it's not that outrageous. Fred has moved around from 8 to 6 to whatever now.
If you believe the Barcelona fans in this thread, they don’t own him the 17m because it’s meant to be paid over the remaining period of his contract.
Surely if that’s the case, any club that wants to cover the 17m can just say it’s a signing bonus to bypass FIFA/UEFA law?
this has nothing whatsoever to do with where the manager wants him to play - it’s about Barca wanting him out
surely you can see this?
You move on to the backup plan like a well ran club does.And then what?
Go into the season with an even weaker CM? Or signed... who? Even then, if there is someone to sign, we'd already have very visibly made them second choice and they may have been less than enthusiastic.
Marching into negotiations and laying down ultimatums like you've got the biggest one in the room only works if you've got a viable backup plan.
True that Barca wants him out, but , in isolation, I don't see anything wrong with how Xavi treats him.
I think the hidden message is De Jong ready to wave the white flag as long as Barca can pay him 8 million instead of the owed 17.The white shirt probably symbolises the white flag: Barcelona are about to surrender and pay him the 17m.
Why would any club pay the money Frenkie supposed to get from Barca and bail out both the parties at own cost? 17m is not a small amount. If his legal team fecked up or whatever happened between him and the club, they both need to sort out between themselves.If you believe the Barcelona fans in this thread, they don’t own him the 17m because it’s meant to be paid over the remaining period of his contract.
Surely if that’s the case, any club that wants to cover the 17m can just say it’s a signing bonus to bypass FIFA/UEFA law?
bloody hell. This is like calling Seamus Coleman a London based sweetcorn importer/exporter.
Which is who? Who is there who is a natural in that position, is available this summer, and is of sufficient quality to make them anything other than yet another expensive sticking plaster?You move on to the backup plan like a well ran club does.
But that’s clearly too much to ask from ourclub
I don’t think De Jong is worth the hassle either which is why the whole transfer is infuriating.Why would any club pay the money Frenkie supposed to get from Barca and bail out both the parties at own cost? 17m is not a small amount. If his legal team fecked up or whatever happened between him and the club, they both need to sort out between themselves.
I think united went as far as they could.
Joan Laporta means Fat John in Spanish. My mate told me and he's been to Spain.
Which is who? Who is there who is a natural in that position, is available this summer, and is of sufficient quality to make them anything other than yet another expensive sticking plaster?
Been there, done that - let’s try something new!I don’t think De Jong is worth the hassle either which is why the whole transfer is infuriating.
It’s De Jong, not bloody Messi/Ronaldo at their fecking prime.
We don’t need much to get an improvement over McFred. Anything would be better than going into the season with them starting in midfield ever again.
Which is who? Who is there who is a natural in that position, is available this summer, and is of sufficient quality to make them anything other than yet another expensive sticking plaster?
I understood the current situation differently. I don't know the numbers exactly but it will be enough to bring the point across.
FDJ sat on a wage package of 60 million for 5 years. 10 million per year plus a stepped loyality bonus, 1 million after the first year, 2 after the second, 3 after the third, 4 after the fourth
(10+1)+(10+2)+(10+3)+(10+4)+10=60
As the virus hit he agreed to change his contract in a way, that his wage package stayed the same in total but the payments were structured differently. For example like this:
(6+1)+(6+2)+(13+3)+(13+3)+13=60
So if there are no other clauses involved in FDJ contract, and he would be transfered in his third year, than he would "lose" out the increased earnings of the fourth and fifth year.
I know the numbers aren't correct, but that is how I understood the situation, which would also be an explanation of why Barca seems intent not to pay him the defered wages, as they are simply not due. The player could sit out his contract to receive the full wage package. But if he wants to go out early, he misses the benefits.
One point seems pretty clear, he seems pretty badly advised legally and economically, if that is the case.
I don’t think De Jong is worth the hassle either which is why the whole transfer is infuriating.
It’s De Jong, not bloody Messi/Ronaldo at their fecking prime.
We don’t need much to get an improvement over McFred. Anything would be better than going into the season with them starting in midfield ever again.
He's not a paid United scout. But i'm sure you know that already.
If the club can’t find an alternative to De Jong, they should be finding replacement jobs for themselves because they’re incompetent.Which is who? Who is there who is a natural in that position, is available this summer, and is of sufficient quality to make them anything other than yet another expensive sticking plaster?
Why would we? We have no need too.I do find it strange that we haven’t come out/briefed the media with some sort of update or something trying to put pressure on barca to pay the man or else we walk away soon. Its gone so quite.
That is a bloody brilliant post.Essentially that. He signed a 5 year deal so would have only had 2 years remaining at this point but when he negotiated the deferred contract it included tacking on 2 more years at the original base salary so that the deferred money could be spread over 4 years and not 2. This helped Barca spread the hit out and was attractive to Frenkie as his base salary was amongst the highest in Spain so 2 more years was desirable. The trouble is that the deferred amount is 17M and the base without that is still in the region of 18.5M net per year at a time when Barca want to cap salaries for even their biggest stars at 10M net per season.
Barca would happily keep Frenkie if he would take a cut to fit their new wage structure but at that point he would be giving up in the region of 50M including the already deferred amount which he is not going to do and would be crazy to accept. His just waiving the 17M does not help them as he would still be massively over the limit they want to set which plays havoc with their budget for this year and beyond not to mention the ill feeling that would be generated within the squad by having one player earning so much more than everyone else.
Morally Barca owe him the money he deferred but it seems legally they do not. Poor work from his agent but FDJ signed the extension in good faith expecting to stay and is now being squeezed to get out of the club. Laporta claims that he is legally not owed the money which may well be true and further justifies his stance by pointing out Bartomeu was the President who signed off on this and it was tantamount to a poison pill for the incoming administration. Kicking salary they could not pay down the road to make it the problem of the new board.
Despite insisting they do not owe the money it was reported widely early on that they were willing to pay a 3.5M settlement to grease the wheels, this seems to relate mostly to that portion of the deferred wages that qualified as a bonus and the sticking point is the remaining base salary that Frenkie gave up. Our decision to increase the guaranteed money in our offer by 10M was interpreted as a way to assist Barca in negotiating a settlement however there seems little evidence that Barca have done anything of the sort and they seem to be steadfast in their position that they owe nothing.
Something has to give. The money from the two tv rights sales has funded their transfer activity so far and the restructuring of some of their debt but leaves them short of being able to register their current signings and if Frenkie stays the only option to register everyone would be the so called third lever which is to sell 50% of the revenue from Barcelona Studios which they are very reluctant to do. It also only kicks the can down the road for 12 months as under the FFP rules the amount of revenue that can be spent on salaries is reducing over the next couple of years whereas Frenkie's salary number for the 2023/2024 season goes up so that creates an even bigger headache as the deferred money is not spread evenly over the 4 years and his total compensation for that season is supposedly 28M net. They need this wage gone, they also need the transfer fee to fund their pursuit of Silva who Xavi sees as a vital part of his rebuild. They do not want to pay Frenkie the 17M to make this happen, when your financial foundations are built on sand any expenditure should be avoided if at all possible but his agent know this all too well and having had his pants pulled down in the original renegotiation by not including a clause that guaranteed his deferred wages he is playing hardball as much for his own reputation as to get Frenkie his money. Knowing Barca really need this transfer to happen is all the leverage they need, Frenkie is being told to play the good soldier and not complain and I imagine every negotiation that begins without an offer of a 17M settlement is being answered with a one word 'No".
Pretty sure ETH and the team must have done their homework on all the pros and cons of this situation.I don’t think De Jong is worth the hassle either which is why the whole transfer is infuriating.
It’s De Jong, not bloody Messi/Ronaldo at their fecking prime.
We don’t need much to get an improvement over McFred. Anything would be better than going into the season with them starting in midfield ever again.
I like itThread title should be
“De Jong and the restless”