hellhunter
Eurofighter
She's hot and says what we want to hear, that's whyWhy does Reddy's reporting carry any weight, isn't she Sky Sports?
She's hot and says what we want to hear, that's whyWhy does Reddy's reporting carry any weight, isn't she Sky Sports?
Why does Reddy's reporting carry any weight, isn't she Sky Sports?
Didn't she also talk about how Chelsea are in for him too?Why does Reddy's reporting carry any weight, isn't she Sky Sports?
Great barca are signing Ronaldo and keeping FDJThose blue wankers over at The Shed End are really laying into us. Laughing and saying they are taking FdJ and Ronaldo from us.
Those blue wankers over at The Shed End are really laying into us. Laughing and saying they are taking FdJ and Ronaldo from us.
She's been incredibly reliable throughout her career. Her track record is why her reports have some weight to them. Just because she's in Sky Sports doesn't mean that she becomes unreliable now.Why does Reddy's reporting carry any weight, isn't she Sky Sports?
Those blue wankers over at The Shed End are really laying into us. Laughing and saying they are taking FdJ and Ronaldo from us.
Fair enough. I don't know much about her and majority of reporting on Sky Sports is complete nonsense and speculation.She's been incredibly reliable throughout her career. Her track record is why her reports have some weight to them. Just because she's in Sky Sports doesn't mean that she becomes unreliable now.
I could be wrong, but I believe they are just letting Memphis go for free with the idea that his next club can then give him a higher wage (or a signing bonus) since they won't have to pay Barca a transfer fee. Barca won't actually be paying Memphis anything. Of course it depends on Memphis finding the right offer so that he's then happy to release Barca from their part of the contract.Really? I didn’t know that. So they are going to pay Memphis but not Frenkie?! Wtf is that about?
She's hot and says what we want to hear, that's why
Why? Surely Neves/Fred is significantly better (both on the ball and defensively) than the Fred/McTominay combo we've mostly used for the last couple of years.neves is a poor option unless you are buying a monster dm. Neves/Fred will get absolutely murdered.
I don’t have to close my eyes, she is intensely aggravating.Close your eyes to only listen to her voice and you'll be thoroughly annoyed.
3 people here are responsible for at least 125 pages.
She's the senior reporter at sky sports right now. You look at every interview with managers and players - she's the one conducting them 1 on 1. She's always around the club and has always been very reliable and knowledgeable in the past with Liverpool, but is now seemingly working on United. But she obviously has her sources.Why does Reddy's reporting carry any weight, isn't she Sky Sports?
I was going to say the same thing, her voice is quite irritatingI don’t have to close my eyes, she is intensely aggravating.
3 people here are responsible for at least 125 pages.
They are significantly better. Don’t see how anyone can deny that.Why? Surely Neves/Fred is significantly better (both on the ball and defensively) than the Fred/McTominay combo we've mostly used for the last couple of years.
The biggest problem with Neves is the price wolves would demand for him. He’s going to be FDJ money or more.I wouldn’t mind Neves as a plan B, but Wolves supposedly want 60-70m
I think I’d prefer United just throw 10-20m into the De Jong deal (signing on fee / up front fee) and get it over the line
Seeing as Wolves know exactly how much we put down for de Jong, i'm sure they'll want their fair share for Neves.The biggest problem with Neves is the price wolves would demand for him. He’s going to be FDJ money or more.
Whilst neves has more quality than mctominay he has no energy, pace or ability to chase down. Mctominay is garbage but Fred/neves will get walked past so easily. It was bad enough with a player who is at least athletic. Neves is like an oil tanker and needs someone to do all the covering and work, Fred is not that player.Why? Surely Neves/Fred is significantly better (both on the ball and defensively) than the Fred/McTominay combo we've mostly used for the last couple of years.
Just saw a tweet, maybe Romano, saying his lawyers are at Barcelona working out a deal to mutually terminate his contract.Really? I didn’t know that. So they are going to pay Memphis but not Frenkie?! Wtf is that about?
I think we're prepared to get the deal over the line with more money but obviously waiting until the last minute to try and save a few million. The backups could be legit or just us saying, sorry Barca, we tried but your wage issue with Frenkie has broken this deal down, we're moving on. I think we'll end up paying more to get the deal over the line in the end. It's a bluffing game at this point. How bad does Barca want to sign more players and how bad to they need to sell Frenkie to make that happen. The new reports of them wanting to offload Depay and Dest are not making their position look good at the moment.I wouldn’t mind Neves as a plan B, but Wolves supposedly want 60-70m
I think I’d prefer United just throw 10-20m into the De Jong deal (signing on fee / up front fee) and get it over the line
First of all, I think it's worth letting you know that your tone is very patronising and condescending.
He's the back-up. De Jong is still the target, but you need back-ups on your list in case the first target is unavailable. Or you end up with potentially nothing. Chelsea will be going through a similar thing due to them missing out on one or two of their targets, as well. It happens at all clubs. Sometimes you get your first choice, sometimes you don't.
As for Neves, you yourself have just said that he is a marginal improvement on what we currently have. The whole point of a transfer window is to improve the quality of your first 11, as well as add depth to the side. We no longer have Matic or Pogba in midfield, so our only real current option is McTominay and Fred. The players need upgrading and if Neves is one who fits the profile, then that's great for us.
If Mane's talent was evident for a long time, then why did we not commit and get him? Or Real Madrid? Or Bayern Munich at the time? What about Van Dijk? Or Kevin de Bruyne when he was at Wolfsburg? Asking "who else is in for him?" is not a valuable metric whatsoever to decide whether a player is worth going for or not. It's useless. You look at what the player can offer and you build a picture of what they can bring to the team. Then it's down to the club to go out and get the player. By the same token, why aren't City or Liverpool in for de Jong? Why isn't Bayern Munich looking at him? Or Juventus, or one of the Milan clubs? It's logic that just doesn't hold up.
For the price Neves would cost it would be underwhelming business, that and him not being all that.
Would prefer Konrad Laimer as a backup, and he'd cost about 1/3 of Neves. In fact I would prefer him in addition to FDJ, but we can't even get one done.
Previous quotes from wolves put him at 90m reckon an actual bid of 60-65m would be neededHow much would he cost?
People have been saying that for months and it hasn't happened. I expect a club like Villa to swoop in at the last moment and pick up a brilliant player.He's going to Bayern.
But then it turned out that literally no one anywhere across Europe actually wants him... so I am quite confident that price would come down.Previous quotes from wolves put him at 90m reckon an actual bid of 60-65m would be needed
I can't see EtH wanting Neves, he won't suit his style. I think this is similar to the CB situation, Torres/Neves are the club targets Martinez/De Jong were EtHs. Hopefully EtH has his own backup.
Why they don’t need the money, don’t want to sell, he is on a contract? What need do they have for 45m??But then it turned out that literally no one anywhere across Europe actually wants him... so I am quite confident that price would come down.