V.O.
Last Man Standing finalist 2019/20
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2019
- Messages
- 9,427
Never heard a player talked about this way in the pros. wow.
It's Troy "cojones" Deeney. He doesn't have many qualms with talking shite about fellow pros.
Never heard a player talked about this way in the pros. wow.
I do agree with Deeney a bit about Fred being targeted in PL because of these lower teams tend to getting physical with him. That forced him to give away the ball.
But Deeney is a cnut and I am a fan of Fred. He carried us when Pogba was out last season.
I think it was a combination of both. And I think this year scoring is up pretty much everywhere, with teams shipping goals left and right with unfit defenders and a lack of preseason costing players, as well as the severe increase in penalties awarded.It's looking pretty likely that last seasons great defensive numbers were probably more to do with us playing a lot of Fred and McTominay than the improvement to the back four.
That doesn’t marry with the facts. We conceded less with Matic in the team.It's looking pretty likely that last seasons great defensive numbers were probably more to do with us playing a lot of Fred and McTominay than the improvement to the back four.
https://www.goal.com/en/amp/news/he...slqinkqub9o?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=amp
I think this is fair criticism. He does give the ball away a lot and he is easy to dispossess and run past.
It's BrunoIt's looking pretty likely that last seasons great defensive numbers were probably more to do with us playing a lot of Fred and McTominay than the improvement to the back four.
That was true till about mid of last season. He started badly for united and was bit shaky in last season too. But against Newcastle and PSG he was totally different beast. Don't remember incident when he was mugged or took too long to pass. He was exquisite.https://www.goal.com/en/amp/news/he...slqinkqub9o?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=amp
I think this is fair criticism. He does give the ball away a lot and he is easy to dispossess and run past.
He is a great midfielder and he should be playing almost every game this season. He has been both terrible and great since he arrived, but now is the time for him to really establish himself. He is the one midfielder we have that can play with everyone else and he provides things consistently that is integral to our tactics.
When Troy Deeney does it on a wet Tuesday night in Paris against last season's CL runners-up, I will think of spending a minute or two on what he wants to say about fellow professionals. Enjoy the Championship, you tw*t.
He's rarely ever been terrible, just made mistakes.He is a great midfielder and he should be playing almost every game this season. He has been both terrible and great since he arrived, but now is the time for him to really establish himself. He is the one midfielder we have that can play with everyone else and he provides things consistently that is integral to our tactics.
Are you serious about your first question? If so here is the answer. Players can adapt and evolve, regress and push on again. I think he has consistently had a very high level since his involvement last season. A few off games but not terrible ones. I think he is ready now. Agree with your point about finding the right blend.how can he be a great midfielder, when in the next sentence you have said he’s been terrible?
I’m really not a fan of his, but players really well against PSG and his energy was very important.
the issue with our midfield in general is finding the right blend.
I think he was terrible in his first season because he made dangerous mistakes every game he played. Didn't look like he would be able to adapt fully. He has found himself though, and I think he has reinvented himself a bit to be more comfortable. I agree with your points besides the semantics on if he has been terrible or just made mistakes. It's not a magical turnaround I don't think, but it just shows you that some players need time to adapt, and what can happen if you give enough time to quality players.He's rarely ever been terrible, just made mistakes.
People are only just starting to notice what he's actually been doing the whole time he's been here.
His off the ball work is world class and that's exactly why we need him. Keep the passing and shooting simple, give it to the more talented players and keep winning the ball and disrupting the opposition off it.
I made a post previously stating he is our most important player behind Bruno as he gives us something none of the others can.
Are you serious about your first question? If so here is the answer. Players can adapt and evolve, regress and push on again. I think he has consistently had a very high level since his involvement last season. A few off games but not terrible ones. I think he is ready now. Agree with your point about finding the right blend.
https://www.goal.com/en/amp/news/he...slqinkqub9o?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=amp
I think this is fair criticism. He does give the ball away a lot and he is easy to dispossess and run past.
That might be it. I think Kante earned his reputation from functioning in a very successful side for a full season. That's what did it. I don't see any inherent issues in Fred that lets me know he can't do the same this season. To some degree I agree about his inconsistency but he has also played with different partners such as Pereira sometimes. On our team everyone has been inconsistent. I think your initial point about finding the right blend is what will help Fred earn his reputation. I think he is a great player now and the best midfielder for our setup, and I hope he proves me right believing in him.he’s had some good games, and patches of good form.
he’s Not had some linear progression where he’s now playing great football most of the time. He’s inconsistent.
far from a great player. Perhaps your definition of great and mine and very different.
I think the 3-5-2 seems to suit most of our players. Helps out our defence massively and we have four very good strikers while we're still lacking a quality right winger. I'd be happy if we continued to experiment with it, especially with our tricky set of fixtures.How good is he now? I think he suits a 352 perfectly
I think the 3-5-2 seems to suit most of our players. Helps out our defence massively and we have four very good strikers while we're still lacking a quality right winger. I'd be happy if we continued to experiment with it, especially with our tricky set of fixtures.
Deeney and et al on Talksport are talking sensationalist bs. That criticism may have been true 2 seasons ago but not since last season. It's lazy punditry.
Yeah, it was a very well balanced. I think two of the biggest winners Shaw and Telles, the system allowed Telles to get forward, he was almost as advanced as a winger at times, with Shaw covering and overlapping him. It covered both their weaknesses nicely. Not to mention Shaw and Tuanzebe's pace were crucial in aiding Lindelof too. I also think Wan-Bissaka benefitted from the help he received from the harder working midfield, Greenwood's very good but he struggles with his defensive duties when he's on the wing, it's part of the reason I think Wan-Bissaka's form suffered so drastically post-lockdown.Its because we played a good game, we had the right balance in the team. It also gives Bruno the chance to press which a 4-2-3-1 does not allow.
We saw against PSG, Bruno led the press and Martial and Rashford pulled wide helping out. So when we were in a defensive press there was a line of 3 against their 2 and AWB and Telles were pressing the full backs not giving an option out.
We do not see this when we play a 4-2-3-1 because Rashford and Greenwood/ Mata are not very good at pressing the ball.
Yeah, it was a very well balanced. I think two of the biggest winners Shaw and Telles, the system allowed Telles to get forward, he was almost as advanced as a winger at times, with Shaw covering and overlapping him. It covered both their weaknesses nicely. Not to mention Shaw and Tuanzebe's pace were crucial in aiding Lindelof too. I also think Wan-Bissaka benefitted from the help he received from the harder working midfield, Greenwood's very good but he struggles with his defensive duties when he's on the wing, it's part of the reason I think Wan-Bissaka's form suffered so drastically post-lockdown.
I mean he's literally just saying what tactics they employed at Watford when they played against us? Don't really see what's wrong with it, and can't see why he'd make it up?
Also as others have said, it probably was true back then, but is less true now as he does tend to spend less time on the ball now then he did before.
What's wrong with it is generalising a player's attributes because of how things went in one single game. When Fred is not on form, his passing becomes horrendous, but I have never watched him and thought that his main issue is him needing multiple touches. That implies a bad first touch or a lack of vision, neither of which is true in his case. He moves the ball quickly and well. If he did dwell on the ball in one game, which United happened to lose 0-2, then that's as much on the team as a whole as him.
Deeney's comments are quite a naked attempt at sh*tting on a United palyer for clicks on a sh*t website. Easiet way to attention on the internet which Troy is known to chase. Followed by laughter from a player as average as Darren Bent. Sorry, they simply can't be taken seriously.
Well, they were, which leads to the point of my original post: Deeney is not worth listening to.Or... He's just saying what the tactics they employed when they played against us. Maybe they were the wrong tactics, but that's what they did.
Not everything is a conspiracy.