@Dirty Schwein if you're android, they are in, my files, internal storage, documents, sports interactive, games.
Cheers mate. I can get to documents but 'sports interactive' isn't there.@Dirty Schwein if you're android, they are in, my files, internal storage, documents, sports interactive, games.
No mate, once you've bought the game from the play store, it's linked to your accountCheers mate. I can get to documents but 'sports interactive' isn't there.
I'll reinstall the game and check again. Maybe it'll update. I won't get charged again though will I?
Perfect. Don't want to waste another £8 on this pile of shit. I'll download when I get home and check for that file. Cheers!No mate, once you've bought the game from the play store, it's linked to your account
What actually happens if you have a bad relationship with the press?
I'm guessing they start twisting your words and printing headlines which could affect player morale, is that it?
Always had a good one but just lately when I give neutral answers they've started the whole "We really need to press you for an answer on this question" kind of thing and they get pissed off if I repeat my answer. I don't care if they don't like me, but I don't want it affecting my team.
I don't really like the whole press thing and see it as a bit of a chore but still do them myself in case the assistant says something stupid, like we're going batter Bayern 8-0 or get hammered by a non-league side. Also think it's a bit weird how it's framed, sometimes it's from the point of view of the journo so when they ask a question that sounds negative and you answer negatively to it, it's actually positive towards your team in a way. It's just disagreeing with the premise/framing of the question so you're answering in the negative. As my mind is always on my team and trying to answer in a way I think would be good for them it just seems a bit strange that at times saying something that I think will boost their confidence is called negative.
Natural fitness attribute will be their recovery ability post game to the next game, so they will recover their fitness at a certain rate. From memory it isn't linked to CA or PA & naturally fluctuates over a players career. I'm pretty sure training doesn't effect it at all.Do improved training facilities and better coaching staff decrease fatigue/make player recovery time faster?
Might be coincidence, or even due to signing players with better natural fitness (I haven't checked), but my players seem fitter this season. Means I'm rotating less often but now I'm getting annoyed players unhappy about game time when previously I'd found it easier to keep everyone happy.
Picking who I think is the best player for each position as long as he's either at Peak (any) or Excellent (any besides tired) and there's not many opportunities for squaddies now. Seemed to have more Excellent but tired occurrences before this season. We bulked up the coaching staff and the training ground was improved recently.
I've always left it to the assistant unless its a big game and I want a bit more immersion. I even had an assistant that would constantly 'blow his top' but it didn't affect anything that I can recall.
Natural fitness attribute will be their recovery ability post game to the next game, so they will recover their fitness at a certain rate. From memory it isn't linked to CA or PA & naturally fluctuates over a players career. I'm pretty sure training doesn't effect it at all.
Quality of pitch will had a better effect on stamina & thus condition/fitness lost during a match which will in turn effect recovery time. Less soggy pitches or newer surfaces will be better on condition ratings during games. Could well be you are seeing the benefits of the better pitch.Cheers, suppose the way fixtures fall can also impact that kind of thing, perhaps they're just a little kinder this season. Almost certainly will be when I get into and past the winter months. We had some games called off because of a frozen or waterlogged pitch the past 2 season which caused a big backlog , which in turn meant more squad rotation was necessary. We're now in a new stadium with undersoil heating for the first time so should lose fewer games to weather.
Also had one guy that I had on loan for 2 seasons in a row that would get loads of those 1-2 or 2-3 day injuries during matches which would mean he needed a little longer to recover. That would mean more chances for his understudy. Haven't got him this season so little things like that would make a difference too.
I've just played Liverpool 4 times in a fortnight. Beat them in the cup and beat them in the league but they've done me at the death in the quarter finals of the CL.
The annoying thing is that I've had to rotate like crazy and still have injuries and fatigued players coming out my ears. They've played the same 11 in all 4 games, plus the league game they had against West Ham in between yet all their players were fresh as daisys.
Haaland is game breaking. I've been playing FM for a while, but I've never had a player this dominant and it's not like I would claim to have perfected my tactic either.
Yeah he is totally nuts, in my United save he scored 38 and 45 league goals in two seasons and both in only 30 league games played.
Saw someone who played a super attacking tactic where he scored 54 goals in one Bundesliga season, complete nuts.
Challenge accepted.
Holy shit.
Unfortunately he had a little drop of form towards the end.
I wouldn't call my tactic particularly exploitativeMaybe it's because I play FM Touch, but last I heard the match engine was the same in both games. The team supporting Haaland is of course quite good, but I guess that's true for anyone who plays with a club that can afford him.this is the one I use for about 80% of games
65 goals. Jesus.
Yeah ME is the same in both games. Also quite funny that the game thinks this is a 4-4-2 narrow diamond.
I take it you played Reus as the SS and Brandt/Sancho as the AP-at?
I actually quite like that formation, looks pretty much how Dortmund played a lot this season under Favre. How did the tactic do overall, apart from Haaland scoring insane amounts of goals?
The 4-4-2 label is actually, because I previously used a saved tactic in that slot and didn't wipe it before changing to the 3421.
I started this save, because I wanted to see how Moukoko turns out. And Reus is doomed on this game: even more injured than in RL and his stats start deteriorating almost immediately. So I just sacrificed him for Moukoko right away.
Brandt I wasn't to keen on given his RL performances and he's disappointed me in FM before, so I shipped him out to finance Camavinga.
I'm already a few seasons in and I didn't necessarily restrict myself to the most realistic transfer stragegy:
This has been my first team - Guerreiro instead of Firpo, but had to sell him now, since his somehow fell off a cliff right when he turned 30, guess the caf was right all along!
I really like the formation: I wanted to use a 3-1-6 in possession and I struggle to get the balance right with back fours and HBs or IWBs, but with the back three and the wingbacks in the midfield strata, thus high up the pitch - even in buildup, it plays out exactly like I want to. The spacing between players is really nice. Naturally my CBs (the two wide ones in particular) bear huge individual responsiblity, so getting two monsters there was a high priority. Those two positions and the wingbacks are where you have to spend a lot of money imho.
I think I'm at a point where the team is just too strong, so I might just end the save here. But if not I'll probably try out something with a more defensive RCM role (Zaniolo has been disappointing) and a more attacking RM role.
And it has to be said that even with all that investment into my defensive players things are still a bit dicey against opponents with top wide players. I guess I could have pulled back my wingbacks, but for matches against Leverkusen (Diaby/Bailey), Bayern, Leipzig and CL KO matches I just switched to a defensive 4-4-2
Final table:
85 points isn't that impressive I guess, but I'm quite happy with the GD
after that loss I started to rotate more and simulated a couple of matches, so with more micro management better results should have been possible.
Yeah I'm stupid, totally forgot that this is the name of the saved tactic not what the game thins the formation is.
Okay and I see you are not in your first season anymore but I agree Reus is getting pretty much injured non-stop even if you put him on half intensity training. Generally every time I tried to manage Dortmund the injury trained just smashed my squad to pieces, felt at times like I'm cursed.
I picked up Eric Garcia in one game just for him to play two games and then get injured for 4-6 months, fecking brilliant. Added to the fact that Akanji was also out for 3 months so I was left with the slowest defense in the world Hummels & Zagadou, needless to say I had to abandon my plans on playing a high d-line.
Akanji is just classic FM. He had an ACL injury 5 years ago, so according to FM logic he has (very) recurring ACL injuries in the game (if I were to guess I'd say like 33% chance per season). In this save he had one each halfway through my first two seasons, before I got rid of him.
I can never really get as much as you'd expect out of Reus, Sancho or Brandt either. But Zagadou is pretty amazing in this game: his pace is actually decent, something like 10 acc, 15 pace at the beginning - but you still improve on that and 18 jumping reach, 18 strength, 18 composure, decent passing stats. He does his job defensively, has solid build up and wins almost every single header.
How does the SS / AP duo behave in the game? I've tried strikerless systems like that quite a few times, but never got it working. I think most of the time the opposition just packs the center and smothers my attacks.
Akanji is just classic FM. He had an ACL injury 5 years ago, so according to FM logic he has (very) recurring ACL injuries in the game (if I were to guess I'd say like 33% chance per season). In this save he had one each halfway through my first two seasons, before I got rid of him.
I can never really get as much as you'd expect out of Reus, Sancho or Brandt either. But Zagadou is pretty amazing in this game: his pace is actually decent, something like 10 acc, 15 pace at the beginning - but you still improve on that and 18 jumping reach, 18 strength, 18 composure, decent passing stats. He does his job defensively, has solid build up and wins almost every single header.
How does the SS / AP duo behave in the game? I've tried strikerless systems like that quite a few times, but never got it working. I think most of the time the opposition just packs the center and smothers my attacks.
It’s definitely easier with bigger teams.Won the Prmier League with Bournemouth in my fourth season, have so far won the Championship, FA Cup, Europa League, Euro Super Cup, Premier league and FA Cup double.
Not sure about anyone else, but I am finding this years game so easy! It seems like as long as you play everyone in a comfortable position, press high and shoot on sight, you will win 90% of your games!
Anyone else finding it easy? Saying that though, with the amount of money in the PL you should realistically win the league with most teams in 2/3 seasons IMO.
That’s rough going.
Thought I'd no longer have bad fixture congestion. Got undersoil heating and we've lost no games to weather for the first time in a few seasons plus we embarrassingly lost in an early round of the cup away to Greenock Morton. Still happening though, and always involving huge games for the club:
I supose it just depends on how you play the game and how you build your squad.When I get these runs I'm never quite sure what to do. Usually decide on prioritising certain games and go full strength in some, 2nd string in others, rotating all the outfield players each game.
Never really been one for mix-and-match during fixture congestion, like playing 1st and 3rd choice CBs in one game then 2nd and 4th in the next etc. I suppose the strength of the side remains more uniform and constant if doing it like that and you never play your absolute weakest team but part of me thinks I'm never actually fielding my best team either. It means playing less than full strength in all 4 games or for however long the run is and I don't like it.
This time I'm going full strength first Roma game, full rotation vs Hearts. Then I'll see, might prioritise Rangers away depending on the result of the first Roma match, might not. That extra day off after the Hearts game is a big plus, means most of the second string could go again against Rangers if I prioritise Roma away. May even do the mid-strength thing for those last 2 games, mixing and matching, even though I rarely do it. Could be forced to if I can't choose which is most important. Hopefully the result of the first Roma match helps me make up my mind.