- Joined
- Jan 3, 2019
- Messages
- 311
90 pts, Kane C, Son, Salah, Calvert, Bruno, Martinez with points.
Code for redcafe league?
Code for redcafe league?
Given the value Villa offer, having a Villa sub keeper has a real opportunity cost and is going to cause problems.I mean there's not many games where a keeper doesn't play. It's not worth spending more. Also, Martinez's second in line is 4m, so you're covered if he doesn't play, which won't happen.
But you do you
I think I feel the sub-premium mids in the game aren't really good this time out from a consistency point of view, including the likes of Grealish, Foden etc. You have the 9+ range which has the essential options in Son, Salah, Sterling, KDB, Bruno and Auba. But once you come down from there, unlike last season where the likes of Mount who gave consistent output the budget mids this time around don't seem worth the investment. I stuck with Podence with 1m in hand, but options like Grealish, Mount, Foden, Podence, Klich, Costa etc don't seem worth the investment and I'd rather just have either premium or downright minimum priced mids and get that investment in attack (strikers). Of course Rodriguez is the one massive outlier to the above, he's probably the most undervalued player in the game.Financially too difficult now without giving up anyone that I really like and getting a huge downgrade. Could do like Zaha + Kane instead of Bruno + Maupay but screw it.
I think I feel the sub-premium mids in the game aren't really good this time out from a consistency point of view, including the likes of Grealish, Foden etc. You have the 9+ range which has the essential options in Son, Salah, Sterling, KDB, Bruno and Auba. But once you come down from there, unlike last season where the likes of Mount who gave consistent output the budget mids this time around don't seem worth the investment. I stuck with Podence with 1m in hand, but options like Grealish, Mount, Foden, Podence, Klich, Costa etc don't seem worth the investment and I'd rather just have either premium or downright minimum priced mids and get that investment in attack (strikers). Of course Rodriguez is the one massive outlier to the above, he's probably the most undervalued player in the game.
My current GW mids and fwds are Salah, Sterling, James, Podence, DCL, Jimenez and Ings and I've strongly considered going Podence + Jimenez to Kane + 4.5 mid. Just don't see the point of having that extra 1-2.5m investment in a mid when I can rather get a banker like Kane instead.
That's exactly my issue with the likes of Grealish and Harvey Barnes. Barnes blows any other mid in that range out of the water when it comes to underlying stats - touches in the final third, big chances, xA and what not. And of course they will haul from time to time, but unlike Barnes who at least has a goal magnet in Vardy to actually make him a viable FPL asset, Grealish is gonna be playing with the likes of Trezeguet and Watkins. I watched the entire game last night, there were so many moves where he drove with the ball against an open leicester defense who were actually open the whole game, but rarely actually managed to find any kind of end product. That's where having DCL for James is a massive bonus, because these playmakers would struggle to get assists unless there is a direct clear cut scoring option to supply to, despite being the centerpiece the whole game.Even when he blanked last night Grealish still got a lot of quality plays within the game.
That's exactly my issue with the likes of Grealish and Harvey Barnes. Barnes blows any other mid in that range out of the water when it comes to underlying stats - touches in the final third, big chances, xA and what not. And of course they will haul from time to time, but unlike Barnes who at least has a goal magnet in Vardy to actually make him a viable FPL asset, Grealish is gonna be playing with the likes of Trezeguet and Watkins. I watched the entire game last night, there were so many moves where he drove with the ball against an open leicester defense who were actually open the whole game, but rarely actually managed to find any kind of end product. That's where having DCL for James is a massive bonus, because these playmakers would struggle to get assists unless there is a direct clear cut scoring option to supply to, despite being the centerpiece the whole game.
Not knocking him down in absolute terms, he's still good value at that price but not when you compare the upside of selling him and getting a volume scorer instead of a decent one at one of the striker options. Especially someone like Kane who is playing that 9+10 role.
Yeah that's fair enough. For me it seems to be Jimenez + Podence to Kane and a filler mid so seems quite tempting. Wolves have looked a bit dire, Jimenez actually dropped last night in price, though that wouldn't affect my selling price. My only premium def is Robertson. And Saiss as Wolves looks sturdy at the back. After that I'm gonna run it out with Lamptey, Justin (likely gonna bin him soon for Ayling/Dallas/Konsa) and Mitchell of course - who was pretty close to getting a CS yesterday. Don't see any point in wasting money in defense, there are no clean sheets on offer, even the liverpool defenders look less valuable now but since they are the only ones who pretty much guarantee attacking returns I can live with them. Glad I picked Robertson over TAA on my WC as well.The issue is that it's not a question of say Bissouma + Kane vs Grealish + Maupay. If it were, I would pull the trigger in a moment, probably. I have to do two downgrades like that to accommodate Kane and considering I already have Brewster, Mitchell and Johnson who will get me close to nothing, I would likely need to accept two more players with very little potential of scoring.
I wouldn’t take center halves in defense but I treat Robertson, Digne and Chilwell as extension of my midfield. Honestly they will probably get more assist and goals than most if not all midfielders in their price range, and occasional bonuses for clean sheets are just an extra for me.Yeah that's fair enough. For me it seems to be Jimenez + Podence to Kane and a filler mid so seems quite tempting. Wolves have looked a bit dire, Jimenez actually dropped last night in price, though that wouldn't affect my selling price. My only premium def is Robertson. And Saiss as Wolves looks sturdy at the back. After that I'm gonna run it out with Lamptey, Justin (likely gonna bin him soon for Ayling/Dallas/Konsa) and Mitchell of course - who was pretty close to getting a CS yesterday. Don't see any point in wasting money in defense, there are no clean sheets on offer, even the liverpool defenders look less valuable now but since they are the only ones who pretty much guarantee attacking returns I can live with them. Glad I picked Robertson over TAA on my WC as well.
Robertson for sure. And Digne is a pretty good bet this season given how Everton are playing. Chelsea being absolutely dogshit defensively as they were last season, even by this season's standards where everyone looks bad defensively has put me off James earlier and Chilwell now, not to mention Chilwell might not be nailed and might be rotated with Alonso. If I am putting anything more than 4m in a defender I want them to be absolutely nailed. But agree with the overall point, which is why I am happy starting Lamptey who is practically playing as a wing-forward in a good BHA attack. Saiss playing in a rare strong defense and being a threat on set pieces makes him an ok bet as of now. Once WHU are done with their tough run, Cresswell would be a good punt as well. Quite a few defenders out there would seem to have attacking potential.I wouldn’t take center halves in defense but I treat Robertson, Digne and Chilwell as extension of my midfield. Honestly they will probably get more assist and goals than most if not all midfielders in their price range, and occasional bonuses for clean sheets are just an extra for me.
What are the views on Trent? Only 1 assist so far.... is he really worth the money?
Robertson for sure. And Digne is a pretty good bet this season given how Everton are playing. Chelsea being absolutely dogshit defensively as they were last season, even by this season's standards where everyone looks bad defensively has put me off James earlier and Chilwell now, not to mention Chilwell might not be nailed and might be rotated with Alonso. If I am putting anything more than 4m in a defender I want them to be absolutely nailed. But agree with the overall point, which is why I am happy starting Lamptey who is practically playing as a wing-forward in a good BHA attack. Saiss playing in a rare strong defense and being a threat on set pieces makes him an ok bet as of now. Once WHU are done with their tough run, Cresswell would be a good punt as well. Quite a few defenders out there would seem to have attacking potential.
I did my Wildcard at the start of the break.
Got rid of TAA/Klich/Connolly/Greenwood for Jorginho/Son/Chilwell/Bamford
I haven't been overly impressed with KDB and got rid of him before the Leeds game for Salah and looks to have been a good decision if he's injured now.
I still have 1m in the bank but I'm happy enough at the moment. Lucky I didn't wait as a number of them have gone up in price now.
Going with Son as captain this week. Cue Spurs WH 0-0 and a Greenwood hat-trick
Ryan (Mc Carthy)
Chilwell - Castagne - Ayling - (KWP Branthwaite)
Rodriguez - Salah - Fernandes - Jorginho - Son
DCL - Ings (Bamford)
I'm toying with bringing in Saiss for Ayling.
No. I had already played the wildcard in GW3. So I can do only one transfer.
Yes, I know it is a no brainer. Just confused which one to do now. If I do one, I will not have the balance to get the other even in next week, unless any of the big names are going out.
We share 10 players in our teams and both scored 79, and both have two players left to playWild card hit!
79 and waiting for Saiss and Bamford left to push through 80.
Martinez
Bellerin -- Saiss -- Robertson
Salah -- Rodriguez -- Grealish(v) -- Son(C)
DCL -- Kane -- Bamford
McCarthy, Mitchell, Bernardo, Oriol Romeu
Is this week a good time to bring back Bruno?
I'm not as sure on that one as you are. Think Alonso will get some games. Lampard is prone to rotation in defense as well as we've seen with him benching James after he arguable had his best game of the season.Chilwell is absolutely nailed. Alonso won't play another game for them after West Brom. Chelsea will be better for clean sheets once they get rid of Kepa but for now I'm keeping Chilwell mainly for offensive threat.
I'm in the same boat, but not interested in it at the moment. City aren't gonna piss about for long and will be back among the goals, and Sterling has given me 40 captaincy points over the last two GWs. City mid who is their main goalscoring option right now and looking pretty much the main man in the absence of KDB is pretty hard to drop.Sterling can easily be "downgraded" to Son or Fernandes
Alonso and Lampard have had a massive fallout. Happened too late for a sale but unless Lampard has a big change of heart, Alonso isn't going to feature anytime soon.I'm not as sure on that one as you are. Think Alonso will get some games. Lampard is prone to rotation in defense as well as we've seen with him benching James after he arguable had his best game of the season.
He's good option. Might want to see how he does a little longer though.No love for Barkley as a cheaper alternative to Grealish?
Sounds reasonable, will save up the transfers and downgrade if he doesn't improve and use the extra money in midfield.I asked myself the same question. I am going to keep him for Sheffield and WHU home fixtures and if doesn't do much, I'll downgrade him for the city game.
I'm tempted to swap KDB and Mitrovic for Barkley and Kane. I'm 0.1m out from Grealish which is annoying, but Barkley is a decent alternative and would leave me an extra 1m to spend elsewhere...No love for Barkley as a cheaper alternative to Grealish?
If I was using my wildcard I'd consider him but not willing to take a -4 for him. I have Costa for Leeds who I will probably look to ship out next week and Barkely is a someone I'd consider going for.No love for Barkley as a cheaper alternative to Grealish?
Yeah he looks like a good option. Grealish doesn't shoot at all. Whereas Barkley is your fifa player who just takes as many shots as he can.No love for Barkley as a cheaper alternative to Grealish?
I'm in the same boat, but not interested in it at the moment. City aren't gonna piss about for long and will be back among the goals, and Sterling has given me 40 captaincy points over the last two GWs. City mid who is their main goalscoring option right now and looking pretty much the main man in the absence of KDB is pretty hard to drop.
My only issue with KDB is fitness. Tried him 2 seasons ago and messed up my fantasy he tend to gave me the highest pts when he play but higher chance of missing games. Drove me nuts with anxiety. Bruno may be better choice considering how he very rarely ever miss games but United's upcoming fixtures is giving me doubts. His recent poor penalty miss is also not helping.This is the same as mine except I have KDB and Klich instead of James and Grealish, and my bench is different. Bruno is probably gonna be worth having, but KDB more so. He could be back next weekend.
Kudos.We share 10 players in our teams and both scored 79, and both have two players left to play
I went with Kane. So at least I am happy that way. Zaha did get a goal in too.and Werner gets two goals and an assist. Typical, which option did you go for in the end?
There’s not many people that are going to have 3 Villa players. It’s also the route Magnus Carlsen has gone, so that’s good enough for meGiven the value Villa offer, having a Villa sub keeper has a real opportunity cost and is going to cause problems.
There’s not many people that are going to have 3 Villa players. It’s also the route Magnus Carlsen has gone, so that’s good enough for me