Chesterlestreet
Man of the crowd
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2012
- Messages
- 19,791
Cole was a better player - otherwise Solskjaer would start and Cole would be a sub. Surely that's a logical statement that needs no further debate.
Football is a game of episodes/moments, and Solskjaer grabbed the biggest/most dramatic of them all which cemented his place in history and contributed to the aura/legend, but let's get real - he wouldn't be in the top 30 United players of all time on ability alone.
Nobody's saying he's a top 30 player on ability alone. The reason why he's considered a legend (one of the greatest, in fact) should be obvious to any United fan.
Which is why it's bizarre to bring this goal ratio business into it in the first place. But once that has been done, it's doubly bizarre to use the fact that he scored more goals in less minutes (than Cole) against him.
Cole vs Solskjaer in general is a pointless debate - it has nothing to do with...anything. It's apples and oranges, for one thing. Cole in his prime was (I would say) a better player than Solskjaer. But Solskjaer had a very different career trajectory, played multiple positions, spent his entire career (after coming to the club) at United, etc.
A slightly less pointless debate would be:
a) Who was the better/more lethal finisher/goal scorer?
or
b) Who had the most impact at United over the course of his entire career?