Biggins
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2021
- Messages
- 472
He really needs to start ahead of Antony. At least we have some right winger in him who will cross the ball.
What he said is not wrong though.Great timing..
The issue is Pellistri rare beat his man to cut back, nor good at crossing. You're purely talking about profile not describe the actual players. It's like saying Maguire is comfortable with the ball, so would fit high line, but forgot he lack pace and is awful at playing an high line offside.I don't think he's good enough long term but I think he's the option on the wing most compatible with Hoijlund. He is capable of getting to the byline and providing crosses and cutbacks. Our other wingers all want to cut in and shoot. I hope he and Hannibal start in Denmark.
You think so? Showed far more physicality and ability to compete athletically than Antony. Turned the ball over because of doggedness too. He looks like a terrier and has gotten quite a bit stronger than he used to be!Desperately needs to hit the gym - so slight and is unable to impose himself due to that
If our team are up to standard, we would need much better option off the bench to back them up. Else we would do formation, shape change rather do like for like replacement with significant worse players.I agree he's probably not starter calibre, but I think he's an excellent asset off the bench if we had a better RW in front of him.
Chasing, harassing he may has it. However, shoulder to shoulder, getting tackled or being chased is different matter. I didn't watch the qualifier game, but even from highlight, he bounced off a Brazil player trying to challenge him in a shoulder to shoulder. It's a theme with him.You think so? Showed far more physicality and ability to compete athletically than Antony. Turned the ball over because of doggedness too. He looks like a terrier and has gotten quite a bit stronger than he used to be!
Think his issues are more that he needs end product, not struggling to get into the positions in the first place.
Understood, but this is relative to Antony, to which, Pellistri is the superior athlete. We're severely lacking in terms of athletic prowess on the right flank: Antony, Sancho, Amad, Antony, Pellistri, Bruno/Mount - not a single one amongst them fast or strong, so it's basically a pick from an unblessed bunch.Chasing, harassing he may has it. However, shoulder to shoulder, getting tackled or being chased is different matter. I didn't watch the qualifier game, but even from highlight, he bounced off a Brazil player trying to challenge him in a shoulder to shoulder. It's a theme with him.
Sounds about right. It's quite telling how after his last game everyone thought Antony couldn't be back soon enough and, even when he has been shite as usual, this thread got zero posts for weeks.Expecting him to start next game, not be great for 45 mins, be subbed off and not see another minute until the fa cup ...
That's how we roll. Unless you're Donny of course. He remains the same.We will just carry on blaming those who play and those not playing will get better just through absence. Long season ahead.
Nothing against Pellistri, but it’s a sad state of affairs that he’s arguably our best actual RW atm.
The hatred for Antony will always blind peoples views slightly to any alternative on the right.
Now I don’t think Pellistri is the answer, but I’m happy for him to get some minutes ahead of Antony and Bruno on the right.
Still need to try Mount and then Amad before we settle on any pecking order.
A squirrel in a k hole would bePellistri had a massive role in the match winner. I understand the “he’s shit” argument and yes of course he’ll never be a Ronaldo or Beckham, but my god he’s vastly more effective than Antony.
People want the best player in each position to play. What's wrong with that?
Not sure how this question relates to my post.
But sure, sounds good, let’s agree to give Pellestri some more minutes.
Great clip of how his workrate played a big part in the goal yesterday.
Definitely not peak samba football, but magnificent in its own gobsmackingly glorious way.
Hopefully Antony, Sancho and Rashford were all watching it live and that ETH makes them watch the work Pesllistri put into that goal over and over and over. If that alone doesn't compel the manager to start Facundo for both Copenhagen and Luton Town serious questions need to be asked what he sees in Antony.
You're OTT with your praise here.Definitely not peak samba football, but magnificent in its own gobsmackingly glorious way.
Hopefully Antony, Sancho and Rashford were all watching it live and that ETH makes them watch the work Pesllistri put into that goal over and over and over. If that alone doesn't compel the manager to start Facundo for both Copenhagen and Luton Town serious questions need to be asked what he sees in Antony.
Definitely not peak samba football, but magnificent in its own gobsmackingly glorious way.
Hopefully Antony, Sancho and Rashford were all watching it live and that ETH makes them watch the work Pesllistri put into that goal over and over and over. If that alone doesn't compel the manager to start Facundo for both Copenhagen and Luton Town serious questions need to be asked what he sees in Antony.
Great clip of how his workrate played a big part in the goal yesterday.
Antony also carries some dislikable arrogance and energy that is a handicap when your are not Neymar. In contrary makes his opponents to want to beat him so hard in every duel and they very much do so. He brings absolutely nothing and Pellistri should be in the team based on that thing alone.Let be honest, Antony has many flaws but his workrate isnt one of them. Workrate isnt any reason to put Pellistri in over Antony. Antony wouldnt have given up at any point where Pellistri keeps on going in that clip. Rashford and Sancho might but not Antony.
However if Pellistri has lady luck following him which causes opponents to make that many mistakes in such a short amount of time than he should be playing every game.