shamans
Thinks you can get an STD from flirting.
Median is not everyone, that's his point.
I didn't say everyone.
Median is not everyone, that's his point.
I didn't say everyone.
Anyone with a regular job can get that much in net assets, though thats not relevant to this discussion.
In the U.S it's the median net worth of a families at retirement.
Median is not anyone.
So NO
The median is literally folks with employed status throughout their lives and not unemployed. So, yes.
The wrong arguments are being made here. Yes, you have highlight the privilege he got from his family and ability to turn that into a success.
However, the critique builds out of that in multiple directions.
1. He's built a company on the backs of cheap and abused labour.
2. He's benefited from state backed intervention to make Amazon what it is today.
3. The "entrepreneur" myth has been used by governments to tear down unions, workers rights, social safety nets in the name of "everyone can be self-made if you get the state out of the way".
4. Governments/politics use Bezos/Amazon et al. to perpetuate the "bootstraps" ideology.
I don't care if Bezos got 250k from his family, what I care about and what I think others should as well, is how that success is sold to people in terms of labour, the political ideology of entrepreneurship and the dismantling of the social state. Bezos feeds into that and like many out of touch rich people, thinks philanthropy is the answer to social safety nets and the woes of the state and thus does not challenge how his "story" is used to influence politics.
If Bezos got 250k from his parents, made amazon what it is today, yet didn't try to bust unions, pay poverty wages, dis-endorse philanthropy, and fought back against his "story" being held up as an example that "everyone else just doesn't try as hard as Bezos and thats why you're poor", no one would give a flying feck. The argument should move beyond "250K and he's self made" to how their success also feeds into societal failures.
It's clearly insinuating everyone. This is a bit topic off again so I'm going to quote a post I missed that was very well done.
You even quoted me and I didn't not say everyone.
"Anyone with a regular job can get that much in net assets, though thats not relevant to this discussion." was my initial statement. The median statistic proves that is true.
Feel free to warn me for taking this off topic once again mods
Median means the midpoint of what ever set of quantities we are observing. This means that the rest of the quantities will either fall below it, or ahead of it in equal measure.
To make this as simple as possible, this emoji "" has in 250 net assets. The people have more. The have less.
Do you see now why the median statistic doesn't prove that anyone with a regular job can have that money?
google says median is 215 at age 60, not 250. in either case, that is the median today, not in the 90s, with growth and inflation it would have been numerically much lower.
...
i think this blog on understanding taxes is the best take on deserved vs undeserved wealth. it is a political/moral notion. bezos "deserves" his wealth as much as homeless people deserve poverty or i deserve the median wage.
that is because his wealth (and mine) arises from the structure of private property and laws related to it, the economics of college of education, and these are further intrinsically linked with tax rates and redistributive policies, minimum wage laws, etc
https://mattbruenig.com/2011/07/13/ways-to-think-about-government-distribution-policy/
given today's politics/morality, he has earned every cent.
You’re being serious here? This was your takeaway?That's a nonsense article. It needs a support yacht because it's a sailing yacht and can't have a helipad. Nothing to do with it's size, it's not even in the top 20, almost all of which are owned by Russian Oligarchs or Middle Eastern dictators.
You’re being serious here? This was your takeaway?
Why can't a sailing yacht have a helipad?That's a nonsense article. It needs a support yacht because it's a sailing yacht and can't have a helipad. Nothing to do with it's size, it's not even in the top 20, almost all of which are owned by Russian Oligarchs or Middle Eastern dictators.
Why can't a sailing yacht have a helipad?
Why can't a sailing yacht have a helipad?
What is a sailing yacht?
How is it ‘poor reporting?’Rich people will buy rich people toys. What's new? It's still poor reporting.
The reporter is very poor.How is it ‘poor reporting?’
Sucked all the fun out of it for me.i hate it when my sailing yacht doesn't have a place for a helicopter to land
Aren’t we all vis à vis Bezos?The reporter is very poor.
i hate it when my sailing yacht doesn't have a place for a helicopter to land
Maybe if all billionaires like Bezos paid a fair amount in taxes like the rest of us mortals, governments would have more money for space exploration.
Maybe if all billionaires like Bezos paid a fair amount in taxes like the rest of us mortals, governments would have more money for space exploration.
Unfortunately, that's not how it works. A bit more money here and there would be used for whatever politicians want that could have nothing to do with Space exploration. It could even be returned to citizens by way of tax cuts.
Jeff Bezos Accidentally Admits He Exploited Amazon Workers To Visit Space
He's a piece of shite. And would not shed a tear if something had happened to him.
Unfortunately, that's not how it works. A bit more money here and there would be used for whatever politicians want that could have nothing to do with Space exploration. It could even be returned to citizens by way of tax cuts.
They should definitely pay more taxes, and a lot more but the problem isn't lack of government money. NASA has over $23b a year budget whereas the whole of the Falcon Heavy project cost somewhere in the region of $0.5b according to estimates. Although that money is also spent on other projects NASA don't currently have a rocket and haven't had for a decade.
I am aware the money of his taxes wouldn't directly go to space exploration, but you guys get the point.
Yesterday we've seen a 24 hour wankfest on the media about a guy who doesn't pay his fair share, who exploits his workers, indirectly exploits people in developing countries, destroys small businesses and is generally an arrogant prick. And why? Because he got inside a metal penis and went on a 10 min trip to near space.
Personally see nothing to celebrate, quite the opposite. It shows our society is so used to this inequality and rich people doing whatever they want at the expense of the public, that we can't even see it when we're slapped in the face by something like this.
Yes, but the problem are the tax laws, which are the responsibility of politicians, not Bezos. Much as virtually everyone else in business, he's simply doing what the system will allow him to do. Time to change the tax laws so these guys pay a lot more money.
I can criticize politicians and those who take advantage of an unfair system at the same time.
And you know very well how much money these guys put into politics to maintain the status quo, so they're not exactly innocent.
All participants take advantage of the rules that are set for them by the people's representatives (aka politicians). Therefore blaming business people is completely futile since they are, from a business perspective, doing what they are supposed to do. The only way to create more balance is to elect politicians committed to doing so.
That's not true, plenty of business people pay their employees decent wages and give them good working conditions. Bezos doesn't, so he should be criticized.
Democracy isn't so simple as you're making it out to be. There are plenty of issues in america (and elsewhere) where you can see the public overwhelmingly support something politicians don't enact because of people like Bezos, who have the power and money to manipulate the system.
You're chosing to blame the voters and politicians, as if Bezos is an AI that can only do what he's been programed to do. He's not, he choses to do these things and act this way.
There were lots of green smileys following the Dubya and Trump tax cuts.
Ultimately, blaming the likes of Bezos for public policy failures isn't going to solve anything. Change the laws that flagrantly allow people to not pay their fair share and you may see other outcomes.
I wonder if Bezos and Amazon have any say, maybe even a disproportionate one, over laws that affect them and consequently everyone else.
Nah, too far-fetched, it's not taught in school civics.
I wonder if Bezos and Amazon have any say, maybe even a disproportionate one, over laws that affect them and consequently everyone else.
Nah, too far-fetched, it's not taught in school civics.