- Joined
- Jul 10, 2015
- Messages
- 174
Thing is Chelsea and City prioritise winning at this level which means taking the most physically gifted kids around who are basically men against boys at that level. Utd on the other hand prioritse actually getting promising players who are technically good and who can long term be turned into first team players. There’s a reason why we continue to produce the best players in the country despite not sweeping up the trophies at this level. To be honest I know which strategy matters most...
I think you and many others understate the level of players Chelsea are now producing. They even had more academy players play more minutes in the league than us last season! That possibility would've seemed crazy a few years ago the stereotype is slightly outdated. It remains to be seen whether they can continue to churn out first team players for themselves but we have gone through pretty barren spells ourselves until recent years with the likes of Lingard, Rashford, Greenwood etc.
@ChelseaYouth on Twitter:
"Chelsea used 35 players over the three previous #FAYouthCup Finals against Manchester City from 2015-17 and every single one of them has played professional football afterwards. Eight of them are full internationals already and 14 have played PL football; nobody is older than 24."