Tom Cato
Godt nyttår!
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2019
- Messages
- 7,724
No dude. Dont listen to that crap. Every time he kicks the ball he breathes "for my father" in the same breath!
Ok fair enough, I choose to believe this romantic reality
No dude. Dont listen to that crap. Every time he kicks the ball he breathes "for my father" in the same breath!
Hope we don't get him if he displaces Martial in the central role. Then there is blocking Greenwood's path into the team.
Nowt wrong with a bit of ambition.Selling Lukaku for 75m and getting this guy for 60m.
Have no idea how this guy is , but hope he becomes better than Lukaku.
Getting a striker that would be a good squad player and won't cost a fortune.What the alternative? Relying on Martial being fit?
He's better than both of them currently and younger than one of them. Why wouldnt you want a player like this at Old Trafford?Hope we don't get him if he displaces Martial in the central role. Then there is blocking Greenwood's path into the team.
Getting a striker that would be a good squad player and won't cost a fortune.
Hehe! You got me. "Every" season was stretching it, but they were leading by 7 points after 20 rounds last season, and I think having a thinner squad than City costed them the title.Do they?
I'm happy with Martial and hope that he proves himself properly this season as the starting striker.We are crying out for an established striker. This would be a travesty.
We’re still clearing out a squad that was full of those. We need to be signing top quality, or those with potential to be top quality. If they get so good they relegate their competition to the bench then so be it.Getting a striker that would be a good squad player and won't cost a fortune.
Getting a striker that would be a good squad player and won't cost a fortune.
Sure, but we have a budget and there are other positions that are more important. If we can spend £300 million, then sure, go spend £70 million on Haaland. But we can't and won't, as much as fans always talk about how loaded we are.We’re still clearing out a squad that was full of those. We need to be signing top quality, or those with potential to be top quality. If they get so good they relegate their competition to the bench then so be it.
Same answer to you.Top teams have 2 top players at least for the striking options.
You can never have a fully happy squad. Always need one or two players on the bench fighting .
No dude. Dont listen to that crap. Every time he kicks the ball he breathes "for my father" in the same breath!
I'm happy with Martial and hope that he proves himself properly this season as the starting striker.
We have a much bigger need of CMs and a CAM than a superstar centre forward.
We have no established center forward, so we certainly need one, as much as we need a right winger and central midfielder.
Martial is going to establish himself so we are fine in that regard.We have no established center forward, so we certainly need one, as much as we need a right winger and central midfielder.
If we want to fit our best attackers together we may play 4-4-2 again with Rashford on the left, Haaland up top with Martial as a support striker and James on the right.So back to LW for Martial if true?
If Pogba goes it pays for the CM.Martial is going to establish himself so we are fine in that regard.
Matic and Pogba are as good as gone, so we have only Fred and McTominay as CMs - we need at least 2 signings there. We desperately need a proper number 10, unless Pereira suddenly starts scoring and assisting frequently, which I don't see happening. Then we have the Luke Shaw conundrum, who I have almost lost all patience with so LB is certainly a possible area for improvement. Then we go onto needing a proper substitute striker and a top class RW or someone with big potential who can compete with James for the spot.
We need more than just Martial. We are desperately short of options up top. Having Rashford, Martial, James, Haaland and Greenwood to cover 5 positions would be the bare minimum. Look what happened when Martial got injured. We were fecked.I'm happy with Martial and hope that he proves himself properly this season as the starting striker.
We have a much bigger need of CMs and a CAM than a superstar centre forward.
Stop pretending anyone thinks you're relevant
Martial is a pretty good left winger. You're a pretty terrible poster
We won't be spending any more than a £100 million of our own money, so you do the math.If Pogba goes it pays for the CM.
We will sign another CF. A young player like Haaland is what we will be after.
No top club in world football has just one striker. Rashford is a winger.
We haven't spend the Lukaku money yet, so what's the issue? that'll cover Haaland. The rest will go on whatever else we need, more than likely a CM and another back up winger.We won't be spending any more than a £100 million of our own money, so you do the math.
I'm not saying we don't need a striker, I'm saying it's not viable to spend loads of our budget on a young superstar when we have other areas that need to be boosted with quality a lot more. Get 2 proper CMs and a CAM and then think about what is affordable for the striker and RW position. People are deluding themselves if they believe the club will buy more than 4 players in the next 2 windows, 3 to 4 would be my guess.
You are right, but we also need a lot more in the midfield area and also a quality number 10. Martial can be world class if performing consistently, who gives us that from our CMs and CAMs (excluding Pogba who I presume is leaving when the season ends)?We need more than just Martial. We are desperately short of options up top. Having Rashford, Martial, James, Haaland and Greenwood to cover 5 positions would be the bare minimum. Look what happened when Martial got injured. We were fecked.
How do you know we haven't used the Lukaku money? I bet the club will never spend as much as it did under LvG or Mourinho, unless we start challenging for major trophies again.We haven't spend the Lukaku money yet, so what's the issue? that'll cover Haaland. The rest will go on whatever else we need, more than likely a CM and another back up winger.
If we want to fit our best attackers together we may play 4-4-2 again with Rashford on the left, Haaland up top with Martial as a support striker and James on the right.
And this why our transfer strategy has been shite for so long, buying players because of their reputation with no regard to how they will fit into the system we are trying to implement. If we are ditching the fluid front 3 play style under Ole and going for a spear head centre forward focused attack by all means go for Håaland. But if that happens we might as well sell one of Rashford /Martial as they both will be wanting the lw role.He's better than both of them currently and younger than one of them. Why wouldnt you want a player like this at Old Trafford?
Because we sold him and didn't buy anybody else?How do you know we haven't used the Lukaku money? I bet the club will never spend as much as it did under LvG or Mourinho, unless we start challenging for major trophies again.
This was a second summer in a row that we had a net spend of around £60-£70 million, it's not just coincidence. I believe that trend will mostly continue, until we start to be one of the top competing clubs again.Because we sold him and didn't buy anybody else?
You can't tell me Maguire, James and Wan Bissaka needed Lukaku to finance that also?
The answer is Pogba. If he leaves then his own transfer fee will more than cover the cost of signing a replacement. I quite agree we need more creativity, but that shouldn't get in the way of signing Haaland. If he is as good as we think he is, then we would be fools to let him sign elsewhere.You are right, but we also need a lot more in the midfield area and also a quality number 10. Martial can be world class if performing consistently, who gives us that from our CMs and CAMs (excluding Pogba who I presume is leaving when the season ends)?
I was thinking we would sell Pogba for £150 million this summer, but it didn't happen and according to loads of reports, no club came close to our valuation. His contract would have 1 less year when the season ends and his value would drop, so unfortunately I don't see how we get more than a £100 million, we might even have to settle for the money we originally played for him.The answer is Pogba. If he leaves then his own transfer fee will more than cover the cost of signing a replacement. I quite agree we need more creativity, but that shouldn't get in the way of signing Haaland. If he is as good as we think he is, then we would be fools to let him sign elsewhere.
How do you know we haven't used the Lukaku money? I bet the club will never spend as much as it did under LvG or Mourinho, unless we start challenging for major trophies again.
Mate, I made my point very clear when I answered your previous comment. If you chose to ignore that, I can't be asked to keep on repeating the same thing as it gets annoying.We spent 145 mil last summer.
That's around the same as under LVG or Jose in a summer window.
https://www.transferleague.co.uk/ma...sh-football-teams/manchester-united-transfers