I read somewhere that his actual fee was 17million and it was the other fees that put off United. If it was the correct figure United should have paid for him no matter what they other fees were.
There are many theories. Some say we turned them down because we wouldn't allow a 60m release clause, as an exit opportunity if they wanted later.
Others say his camp turned us down because they felt it was mostly Solskjær that wanted him, and in December/January there was no guarantee that Ole would he here after the summer. A new manager might not fancy Haaland in the same way and it could risk the development of his career (another reason they might have wanted that exit opportunity by release clause).
I'm sure either side were willing to fill their coffers.
But looking at it from Haaland and his family's side this was the best possible deal for them.
They got paid handsomely cause he was moving for a mere 20m release clause, so they got bonuses on the side to choose Dortmund. He gets to be the big man at a club that is always in the Champions League, and a dark horse candidate for a league title if one other team has a bad season.
Guaranteed development without having to fight for starting spot, with lots of other exciting youngsters next to him on the field.
When he's 22 he can move to basically any club in the world because the transfer will be simple, cheap all things considered and impossible for Dortmund to block. Him and his family can once again ask for outside bonuses due to no biddingwar on the fee to Dortmund.
By 22 if he continues on the same path he will be an established striker that can expect to start at any club that would want to bring him.
I would have loved if Haaland was already with us, but he has mapped out his career path excellently. I can only hope we will be in for him in two years.