Andycoleno9
matchday malcontent
Poor Dortmund. After 2,5 years they will lose him for 60 mil.
The debate is how we refused to put release clause in his contract because "We are Manchester United".I'll most probably be banned for this but I don't understand : a very talented young player chose the better team, the better teammates, the better coach, the better managment... What is there to debate?
I'll most probably be banned for this but I don't understand : a very talented young player chose the better team, the better teammates, the better coach, the better managment... What is there to debate?
I'm as sad and disapointed as anyone here. But every word I wrote is true.Enjoy your ban traitor.
It's been 2.5 months, all fair.Best striker I've seen this decade, and it's not even close.
Imagine our club was being run properly, we could have Haaland, Pogba, Bruno, etc. Instead we're fecking around with this dross season after season... soon we will turn even Bruno into shite
Yep, same. Something about an absolute thunder bastard from outside the box like that. You don't really see strikers hit balls like that anymore, they'd rather get closer and place it in the corner.That second goal last night...
I was off my seat when I saw it, real top class stuff.
Hopefully Dortmund will grow a backbone and not be held hostage to a transfer this time. Would be lovely to see Raiola cut out of the deal entirely but personally I think they'd do well to even get a reasonable fee that properly reflects his ability and growing reputation.
It's been 2.5 months, all fair.
I think he might. I guess it will depend a lot on when this sick run of form stops if it ever does, and how quick he can get back to it if so. If he just continues like this he'll likely move within possibly a year or two at the latest.How long do you think he’ll stay at Dortmund? Was discussing with some lads at work and one was convinced bigger clubs will be in for him in the Summer!
Did clubs sleep on him in January? Will he go elsewhere within 2 years do you think?
The debate is how we refused to put release clause in his contract because "We are Manchester United".
We are spending ridiculous money on average players but we make a stand when we can get amazing talent. That is the problem
This is gonna be the one that got away, our tale of heartbreak, until the next shiny object comes along... (and signs for someone else).Saddle up boys, this is only gonna get worse for the next two years until he gets injured. He is just something else and will keep improving. He is too hungry to end up like a Martial or one of those spoilt talents.
He looks an amazing talent. However I still stand what i said few months ago. His release clause in 2022 could have been triggered by anyone, including City n Liverpool and we'd have been helpless to stop it.
All the fans moaning we didn't get him now would have had lost the plot totally had we got him and lost him to rival in 2022. Just not meant to be. Maybe we will kick on and be the club to trigger the clause in 2022 though. That's what we have to aim for surely.
He looks an amazing talent. However I still stand what i said few months ago. His release clause in 2022 could have been triggered by anyone, including City n Liverpool and we'd have been helpless to stop it.
All the fans moaning we didn't get him now would have had lost the plot totally had we got him and lost him to rival in 2022. Just not meant to be. Maybe we will kick on and be the club to trigger the clause in 2022 though. That's what we have to aim for surely.
Best striker I've seen this decade, and it's not even close.
Imagine our club was being run properly, we could have Haaland, Pogba, Bruno, etc. Instead we're fecking around with this dross season after season... soon we will turn even Bruno into shite
I don't understand that logic. First of all even if he leaves 2022 you still had player who scored goals for you and you end up with profit. This mentality around United how every player must stay 10 years in club is ridiculous.He looks an amazing talent. However I still stand what i said few months ago. His release clause in 2022 could have been triggered by anyone, including City n Liverpool and we'd have been helpless to stop it.
All the fans moaning we didn't get him now would have had lost the plot totally had we got him and lost him to rival in 2022. Just not meant to be. Maybe we will kick on and be the club to trigger the clause in 2022 though. That's what we have to aim for surely.
I respect Dortmund. Big club with fantastic fans and they are perfectly organised. But despite everything, Man Utd is level above. And to think that player chose them while having the same ( or better) offer from us is delusional.People just don't see the irony in their posts. Blaming Manutd for being arrogant and not signing Haaland when they are arrogant enough to believe that we rejected the player instead of player rejecting us for better development club for him. They are arrogant enough to believe whole footballing world revolve around ManUtd.
I respect Dortmund. Big club with fantastic fans and they are perfectly organised. But despite everything, Man Utd is level above. And to think that player chose them while having the same ( or better) offer from us is delusional.
You have many reports( now it is up to you will you believe it) that we didn't want to give him what Dortmund gave him. We give to dross players +100k per week contracts and overpay players from PL clubs but we decided to make a stand when we could have bought top talent.
We missed to buy Haaland for 17mil but we bought squad player from championship for that money ffs. Where is logic in that?
At this rate they'll struggle to keep him beyond the summer, Juve, Madrid etc. all need a new striker.Poor Dortmund. After 2,5 years they will lose him for 60 mil.
Aguero? Suarez? Lewandowski?
No doubt the boy is talented but still too early for that claim.
I respect Dortmund. Big club with fantastic fans and they are perfectly organised. But despite everything, Man Utd is level above. And to think that player chose them while having the same ( or better) offer from us is delusional.
You have many reports( now it is up to you will you believe it) that we didn't want to give him what Dortmund gave him. We give to dross players +100k per week contracts and overpay players from PL clubs but we decided to make a stand when we could have bought top talent.
We missed to buy Haaland for 17mil but we bought squad player from championship for that money ffs. Where is logic in that?
I respect Dortmund. Big club with fantastic fans and they are perfectly organised. But despite everything, Man Utd is level above. And to think that player chose them while having the same ( or better) offer from us is delusional.
You have many reports( now it is up to you will you believe it) that we didn't want to give him what Dortmund gave him. We give to dross players +100k per week contracts and overpay players from PL clubs but we decided to make a stand when we could have bought top talent.
We missed to buy Haaland for 17mil but we bought squad player from championship for that money ffs. Where is logic in that?
I'll most probably be banned for this but I don't understand : a very talented young player chose the better team, the better teammates, the better coach, the better managment... What is there to debate?
He’s being sarcasticI'm as sad and disapointed as anyone here. But every word I wrote is true.
I don't understand that logic. First of all even if he leaves 2022 you still had player who scored goals for you and you end up with profit. This mentality around United how every player must stay 10 years in club is ridiculous.
But why should he leave if someone wants to pay release clause? Are we some midtable club who is helpless in that situation? We are big and rich. If something we can do is that we can match any wage which would be offered to him.
I was not much into signing him but for 20 mil( plus agent fees) we could have sign top top talent. And we fecked it up.
I don't understand that logic. First of all even if he leaves 2022 you still had player who scored goals for you and you end up with profit. This mentality around United how every player must stay 10 years in club is ridiculous.
But why should he leave if someone wants to pay release clause? Are we some midtable club who is helpless in that situation? We are big and rich. If something we can do is that we can match any wage which would be offered to him.
I was not much into signing him but for 20 mil( plus agent fees) we could have sign top top talent. And we fecked it up.
I mean you're the type of poster who would be the first to moan had we got him then then lost him for the rumoured £60m in 2022 to maybe City or Liverpool etc.
It's easy to say we should have got him now and worry about what happens in 2022 later. But when that time came you'd all change your tune. That release clause in his contract is very small time in my opinion. Imagine if he really settles in Germany and moves to Bayern. Dortmund fans will be gutted.
I think we did the right thing in the end. He may have still chosen Dortmund anyway as well lets not forget. It wasn't a foregone conclusion he would choose United.
That is actually the thing that always baffles me as well. A lot of people seem to assume, that Haaland having that clause would mean that he would leave the first chance he gets. I see a release clause in a hypothetical United contract (I don't think he went to Dortmund because United did not want to grant him his wishes, so this is all hypothetical, as is most of the discussion here) as a form of insurance for the player to be able to leave if things at United don't go his way. This can mean that either he does not get to play as much or in the positions he wants to or the club is not doing as well as he may have hoped it would. What a lot of people don't seem to consider is the possibility that Haaland could have been extremely successful at United as well and then he may not have wanted to leave. Because, you know, United is one of the biggest clubs in the world and all that.Am I the only one who finds it funny that you guys are happily attesting Dortmund 'small club mentality' when the biggest issue most United fans had with the release clause is that City or Liverpool would steal Haaland from you anway once it is activated?
I am?? feck...I mean you're the type of poster who would be the first to moan had we got him then then lost him for the rumoured £60m in 2022 to maybe City or Liverpool etc.
It's easy to say we should have got him now and worry about what happens in 2022 later. But when that time came you'd all change your tune. That release clause in his contract is very small time in my opinion. Imagine if he really settles in Germany and moves to Bayern. Dortmund fans will be gutted.
I think we did the right thing in the end. He may have still chosen Dortmund anyway as well lets not forget. It wasn't a foregone conclusion he would choose United.