So the review and eth going or staying will be closed this week??? Or is eth going by end of week.. that tweet is all over the place. Makes no sense
"Ezza"? Is that a thing?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Ah sure we've had Wazza in the past, why not Ezza?!"Ezza"? Is that a thing?
I think he means Eze, the Palace midfielder we were linked toWho the feck is Ezza?
Just curious, is he still a reporter at the point or just a parody?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
That was a joke.Early last week you said one day that he'll be gone by the end of the day. Then that he's not going at all, but we also want Southgate. Now a week later you're saying nothing till next week.
Come clean or explain why you've been wrong and what you've been told to make you so sure it'll be next week.
Like I said we need to become a regular champions league team before we can even dream of the title. Being in the CL regular will at least allow us to build a stronger squad and attract better players. And you never know we could win the league sooner rather than later in a one of season, when Guardiola leaves city it’s basically open season for everyone. It’s anyones to win. I mean even Leicester have won it in a one off season so anything’s possible. We all know that we’re not ready to challenge for the league for at least 2 more seasons.This squad shouldn't have finished 8th though. So if we hopefully get 4th next season in year 3, the goal for year 4 will be to repeat it? How long before we can challenge for the title then?
Covering all his bases thereTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
If i remember correctly, 9/10 he’ll post something like this & then it will happen shortly after. So make of this what you willJust curious, is he still a reporter at the point or just a parody?
Never breaks anything but almost always post a 'something then' about our sagas.![]()
Yeah I think you're right. I remember at least once this cryptic message was posted and then something big happened but can't recall what. Was it the ownership saga?If i remember correctly, 9/10 he’ll post something like this & then it will happen shortly after. So make of this what you will
Ok i understand why now![]()
![]()
![]()
First one to roll a six winsLook, it couldn't be any clearer unless you're being intentionally obtuse.
Blanc puts on a bald cap and pretends to be Ten Hag, and Brailsford puts on a wig and pretends to be Sir Jim. And then they shout at each other for hours in vigorous debate until one of them concedes due to boredom. And then the oil lathered shagging starts...
I sincerely hope not."Ezza"? Is that a thing?
fair enough. I apologize on that comment.Blanc was never in line to be the CEO of Manchester United.
That was the media putting one and one together to get 3.
He is CEO of INEOS sporting division and was announced on our board during the acquisition as a representative of INEOS. That's where the confusion came from for the journalists reporting it at the time and why it quietened down pretty quickly.
It was also reported not long before the Berrarda appointment that the Glazers had agreed that the Sporting side and commercial side went hand in hand and that INEOS would also be involved in that side (which I believe was a briefing warming up to said appointment).
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5224377/2024/01/24/man-utd-ineos-jim-ratcliffe/
What was never reported was that the Glazers told INEOS no regarding Blanc.
Not sure but Sancho/Bruno transfers are sticking out to me for some reasonYeah I think you're right. I remember at least once this cryptic message was posted and then something big happened but can't recall what. Was it the ownership saga?
First one to roll a six wins
"It's anyones to win" ignores the fact that Arsenal have a massive head start on us. And it's not like once Pep leaves, City will disappear. At best, they'll come down to a regular 86-90 point team rather than one that can reel off 95+ point seasons at will.Like I said we need to become a regular champions league team before we can even dream of the title. Being in the CL regular will at least allow us to build a stronger squad and attract better players. And you never know we could win the league sooner rather than later in a one of season, when Guardiola leaves city it’s basically open season for everyone. It’s anyones to win.
We should really stop using extreme anomalies like Leicester as something to base future plans or hopes on. Real won three CL on the trot. Who knows, maybe we can also do that after a couple of seasons. It's been done before. Or Pep's 4 PL in a row. Or Fergie got 5 years to start winning titles, so every manager should get 5 years in case they turn into the next Fergie. Anything is possible.I mean even Leicester have won it in a one off season so anything’s possible. We all know that we’re not ready to challenge for the league for at least 2 more seasons.
Besides we were 9 points off top four and beat the 4th placed team home and away - we were effectively challenging for top 4 until we fell away in March. So he is saying if we get the players in we will marginally improve - a poor return for the fees and wages we spend on players.Well I doubt I would personally but that's hardly the point. When he was hired I doubt any United fan and certainly not the club would have been happy with the seasons goal of his 3rd year being to maybe challenge for 4th place.
Especially not after the backing he's had in the transfer market.
What about Erik? In fairness I can't get on board with Ezza for any name. It's just Jackson being an annoying twat.Anyone who tweets using the word Ezza for Eric should be ignored
Only if you’re a complete bellwhiff."Ezza"? Is that a thing?
Probably finalising the details of the manager who is taking over as well as giving space since the FA Cup final.So I’m puzzled as to what is actually happening.