LawCharltonBest
Enjoys watching porn..with foxes
I think Ashworth, Berrada not being in place was a big factor. But I would say that there being no standout attainable hire is a bigger oneRatcliffe said that the decision to keep him was made before the new SLT was in place.
Berada has said the decision didn’t involve him because it was 2 months before he started.
Ashworth said the decision was made before he joined.
They’ve all washed their hands of him in public already. I think they will all be chomping at the bit to get their own man into the job.
I honestly think that the decision was made to keep him because they didn’t want to be lumbered with a new manager that Ashworth had no involvement in hiring. The new manager will represent the real start of the new era and will be chosen carefully.
This is the first opportunity the complete team have to sack him - it sounds like it will always be taken at these SLT meetings which happen once a month so the last one would have been at the start of September - too early if we were giving ETH a chance to prove himself.
He’s had his chance, he’s failed and they will be very much looking forward to getting their own hire in.
If there was an opportunity like when Liverpool and city got Klopp and Guardiola, then I think United would have taken it during the summer regardless of who was in place
If, as seems likely, Ten Hag survives the International break and is here for Brentford then I say it's due to there being nobody available who United are desperate to get. If Klopp called Ashworth today and said he'd be open to managing United then I think they'd shove Ten Hag's bicycle up his bum and boot him down the street.