Why is nobody talking about the time needed to bed in new players? It used to be said every year about many clubs and yet with some of the busier clubs like us and Chelsea it seems everyone thinks it should all click immediately.
Don't get me wrong, our performance level against Liverpool was embarrassing, but with increasing confidence and development of understanding between the new players and the rest of the squad, there's every chance we'll go on to have a decent season. I think there's a lot of potential in our squad, albeit I'm not completely convinced by the coach. We're clearly not better than City, but if we got lucky with injuries and the new players settle in quickly then I'd expect us to be in the top 4.
We've been giving managers way too long to be settings things right, there hasn't been one manager that has been at the club since SAF retired, that would have got as much time if they were at any of the top clubs in Europe.
We sit around and hope something gels. This manager has a huge ego problem without any evidence to back it up. He seems to be buying players he has managed and what happens when they are all gone? Do we go full circle and sign Sancho back in 3 years time or buy Kimbwala?
You just come up with your own stats: the amount of goals against considering injuries. How is that for other teams that have injuries as well? You just can’t ignore we had a lot of goals against last season and call it a meaningless stat, it is a hard fact.
Crystal Palace away will definitely be a better barometer of where we're at, and if we've actually improved. A solid performance there, and he'll regain a smidgen of confidence back.
I felt the same, so went through and looked at both Ole and ETH's cup runs. It's actually closer than I thought, but Ole did have the harder runs.
In the domestic cups they both faced mostly PL teams (15 out of 22 ties for Ole, 13 out of 19 ties for ETH). I'd say the opposition strength was about the same, but Ole was mostly away against his PL opponents (5 home and 9 away) while ETH has only played one away tie (7 home and 1 away). There were also some matches at Wembley or two-legged ties, in case you were wondering why the numbers don't add up correctly.
Likewise in Europe it's closer than I expected, but overall Ole did have stronger opposition.
I felt the same, so went through and looked at both Ole and ETH's cup runs. It's actually closer than I thought, but Ole did have the harder runs.
In the domestic cups they both faced mostly PL teams (15 out of 22 ties for Ole, 13 out of 19 ties for ETH). I'd say the opposition strength was about the same, but Ole was mostly away against his PL opponents (5 home and 9 away) while ETH has only played one away tie (7 home and 1 away). There were also some matches at Wembley or two-legged ties, in case you were wondering why the numbers don't add up correctly.
Likewise in Europe it's closer than I expected, but overall Ole did have stronger opposition.
We definitely have had favorable draws under ETH. Finals against City aren’t really draws as you play the only team that’s there. Our path to 2023 League Cup final was historically easy, both European groups were very easy too (that of course did not prevent us from getting spanked by two mediocre sides in CL).
Probably makes more sense to look at shots on target, but even then that wouldn't really mean much. Expected big chances created against us is probably a better metric. Last season we had the 5th worst XG against us in the league, this season we have the 11th worst so far. Still early days but an improvement, although I would be looking for the metric to improve rather than stay the same or get worse.
What's more important so far is that we are third in the league for chances created and 1st for big chances missed. If we improve the XG against a bit more, keep up the chances created and start taking more of them we will be in a good spot this season. Still early though.
I felt the same, so went through and looked at both Ole and ETH's cup runs. It's actually closer than I thought, but Ole did have the harder runs.
In the domestic cups they both faced mostly PL teams (15 out of 22 ties for Ole, 13 out of 19 ties for ETH). I'd say the opposition strength was about the same, but Ole was mostly away against his PL opponents (5 home and 9 away) while ETH has only played one away tie (7 home and 1 away). There were also some matches at Wembley or two-legged ties, in case you were wondering why the numbers don't add up correctly.
Likewise in Europe it's closer than I expected, but overall Ole did have stronger opposition.
I said in this or another thread that Ole routinely bottled it in winnable cup games/situations.
In 20/21 alone:
Need one point from last two CL group games (loses both). There was also the awful performance in Istanbul before that.
League Cup Semi final against a city side that he was almost routinely beating at times (loses 2-0)
FA Cup quarter final against Leicester (loses 3-1)
Loses Europa League against Villareal.
For all Ten Hag's faults, he has got over hurdles to have some success.
Beating Villa, Forest and Newcastle to win the League Cup in 22/23 clearly wouldn't have been a guarantee under Ole even in similar circumstances (again, as proven by the lack of trophies in 20/21).
Likewise, beating Liverpool and city to win the Fa Cup whilst under an insane amount of pressure with an underperforming side is a massive plus for Ten Hag and again something Ole wasn't able to do (going back to losing in the Champions League and FA Cup against Barca and Wolves in 2019.)
I said in this or another thread that Ole routinely bottled it in winnable cup games/situations.
In 20/21 alone:
Need one point from last two CL group games (loses both). There was also the awful performance in Istanbul before that.
League Cup Semi final against a city side that he was almost routinely beating at times (loses 2-0)
FA Cup quarter final against Leicester (loses 3-1)
Loses Europa League against Villareal.
For all Ten Hag's faults, he has got over hurdles to have some success.
Beating Villa, Forest and Newcastle to win the League Cup in 22/23 clearly wouldn't have been a guarantee under Ole even in similar circumstances (again, as proven by the lack of trophies in 20/21).
Likewise, beating Liverpool and city to win the Fa Cup whilst under an insane amount of pressure with an underperforming side is a massive plus for Ten Hag and again something Ole wasn't able to do (going back to losing in the Champions League and FA Cup against Barca and Wolves in 2019.)
No he didn't but neither did Ole even when he only needed 1 point from 2 games.
Ultimately, Ten Hag has got us over the line on occasions to win a couple of trophies. Ole never managed that even when we had realistic opportunities to do so.
Some stats are highly dubious, such as "shots". The eye test is a better guide in some cases than the official stats.
As for a snap judgment on ten Hag so far, we clearly weren't ready for the season when we faced Fulham. And we clearly were on the back foot against Southampton for the first 30 minutes, but after the Onana pk save we started to come together and deserved the win that we eventually got after a very nervy first 30 minutes.
No one is getting sacked over the next month so let's take it one game at a time and hope that what we can build on what we saw after the 30th minute against Southampton.
Some stats are highly dubious, such as "shots". The eye test is a better guide in some cases than the official stats.
As for a snap judgment on ten Hag so far, we clearly weren't ready for the season when we faced Fulham. And we clearly were on the back foot against Southampton for the first 30 minutes, but after the Onana pk save we started to come together and deserved the win that we eventually got after a very nervy first 30 minutes.
No one is getting sacked over the next month so let's take it one game at a time and hope that what we can build on what we saw after the 30th minute against Southampton.
Makes you wonder if some actually follow united or follow the manager and are here to support him to the hilt no matter what evidence backs the assertions that we're going nowhere fast under Ten Hag.
How can one claim to be a true united supporter and make such a clueless affirmation about our goals conceded in our worst season on record in the PL? It beggars belief
I would not say that. The De Ligt goal came off a corner kick. I'd have count the number of passes that led to the other two goals after Onana last touched the ball, but it was surely more than a few.
Making a great save especially a pk, however, can have a transformative impact on the psychology of a game. But Onana's passing, while quite solid agains Southampton, had virtually nothing to do with our poor play in the first 30 minutes or our improved play in the following 60+ minutes.
Makes you wonder if some actually follow united or follow the manager and are here to support him to the hilt no matter what evidence backs the assertions that we're going nowhere fast under Ten Hag.
How can one claim to be a true united supporter and make such a clueless affirmation about our goals conceded in our worst season on record in the PL? It beggars belief
I'm not going to join the pile on because many stoop to that level when they don't agree with me. But sometimes I can't work out whether some posters are just on a wind up or genuinely believe the stuff they come out with.
No he didn't but neither did Ole even when he only needed 1 point from 2 games.
Ultimately, Ten Hag has got us over the line on occasions to win a couple of trophies. Ole never managed that even when we had realistic opportunities to do so.
We've been giving managers way too long to be settings things right, there hasn't been one manager that has been at the club since SAF retired, that would have got as much time if they were at any of the top clubs in Europe.
We sit around and hope something gels. This manager has a huge ego problem without any evidence to back it up. He seems to be buying players he has managed and what happens when they are all gone? Do we go full circle and sign Sancho back in 3 years time or buy Kimbwala?
I'm not necessarily saying the manager needs time, it's more a general point about the media and fans. Criticising new players after they've been at the club 5 minutes when there's been a lot of changes is a relatively new thing I think, it's hardly mentioned the settling in factor it seems. Except for Liverpool of course who have precisely zero new signings.
I know it's a very small sample size of 2 games, but it's clear to me that we have made imrpovements in creating chances. However, our main issue lies in our forwards' inability to convert these opportunities into goals. Rashford, Bruno, Amad, Garnacho, and Mount have all been guilty of missing several good chances so far. This team still seems to be suffering from a lack of confidence to me.
The high expected goals against (xGA) is partly due to the clear-cut chances we conceded, particularly against Brighton. For instance, if Maguire had cleared the initial cross—something he was well-positioned to do—we might have easily avoided their first goal.
While some may argue that Fulham could have recorded a higher xG against us due to Andreas' missed 2v1 situation, the same argument applies to us. Amad's messing up in a 3v2 situation against Brighton was a similar missed chance for us.
This pattern of missed chances has also been evident in pre-season games, like against Liverpool, and in the Community Shield match against City, where we created multiple good opportunities but struggled with finishing. While there is a call for a world-class striker, it's important that our current forwards should still be able to capitalize on their chances, as not every chance will fall to that striker. Teams like Liverpool and Arsenal benefit from contributions across their squad—Jota and Diaz for Liverpool, and Saka, Odegaard, and Trossard for Arsenal to name a few.
The result against Brighton was particularly hard to take because we performed reasonably well but lost due to lapses in concentration from our defense. In my view, ETH's job depends significantly getting these players to finish their chances. Both he and the new coaching staff have a huge task on their hands in that regard.
Brief update on this post from earlier. We’re continuing to create good chances compared to last season(although it's very hard not to considering the clusterfeck of a season we had previously), which aligns with what I’m seeing on the pitch. But, individual mistakes still contribute significantly to our high xGAgainst. For example, Maguire’s non-clearance against Brighton is now aided by Dalot’s penalty against Southampton which together account for about 1.6 of our xGA. While the goals conceded against Liverpool were also due to individual errors in midfield, these chances didn’t have as high an xG and could have been managed better by both our defence and goalkeeper.
Our upcoming fixtures will present a greater challenge than Southampton, so it will be interesting to see if it falls off. With De Ligt and Ugarte settling into the squad and Shaw still to come, we should hopefully see improvements defensively. It’s also encouraging to see goals from Rashford and Garnacho; we need contributions from all our attacking players, as I mentioned earlier. Hopefully this gives them enough confidence to go on a scoring run now; especially Rashford.
However, I’m concerned about Bruno. Against Southampton, he took wayward shots from outside the box and held onto the ball for too long to the point where he got into nervy situations on a couple of occasions. This doesn’t seem to be a result of tactical instructions either, as other players managed the ball well without getting themselves into trouble from what I can remember.
The problem with your relative comparison is that last season's defensive numbers in the PL were abnormally bad. The top 10 sides of the PL averaged 54.1 goals conceded, which is almost 11 goals higher than the average for the previous 5 seasons (43.4 ± 1.5). So if you only compare United to last season's teams it will paint a rosier picture than it should.
58 goals is 1.5 goals per game. That is, in absolute terms, a lot of goals.
The problem with your relative comparison is that last season's defensive numbers in the PL were abnormally bad. The top 10 sides of the PL averaged 54.1 goals conceded, which is almost 11 goals higher than the average for the previous 5 seasons (43.4 ± 1.5). So if you only compare United to last season's teams it will paint a rosier picture than it should.
58 goals is 1.5 goals per game. That is, in absolute terms, a lot of goals.
The problem with your relative comparison is that last season's defensive numbers in the PL were abnormally bad. The top 10 sides of the PL averaged 54.1 goals conceded, which is almost 11 goals higher than the average for the previous 5 seasons (43.4 ± 1.5). So if you only compare United to last season's teams it will paint a rosier picture than it should.
58 goals is 1.5 goals per game. That is, in absolute terms, a lot of goals.