Eddy_JukeZ
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2012
- Messages
- 17,521
The latest argument for keeping ETH is "you need to find a manager who will have United in title races and the CL's business-end. It is 'knee-jerk' to sack without securing a suitable replacement in this regard."
Despite the fact ETH clearly can't do that but unless you find a manager who 100% will do that, then there's no point sacking Ten Hag since his failings are just ignored.
I don't think there's enough words in the dictionary to define just how idiotic that type of reasoning is.
And the insane part is that I've seen a few posters essentially say that in different ways.
Despite the fact ETH clearly can't do that but unless you find a manager who 100% will do that, then there's no point sacking Ten Hag since his failings are just ignored.
I don't think there's enough words in the dictionary to define just how idiotic that type of reasoning is.
And the insane part is that I've seen a few posters essentially say that in different ways.