criticalanalysis
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2015
- Messages
- 7,379
Good with the ball when he is not under pressure. Slightest pressure and he’s horrible. Poor at defending, no coincidence both goals are in his path. Passive.
He switched off and was passive for the second goal (and to a slightly lesser extent the first goal) but to critise his ball playing? That's stretching.
He was more than fine with the ball when pressed or not. I think you've confusing him with Lindelof, who when playing at right back got a taste of his own medicine where AWB receives tentative square balls into his path i.e not given an opportunity to do much with it.
Like Lindelof, he's not helped when we decide to flood all our midfielders and attackers deep into the other team's half and just expect the ball from the defence to somehow transition into the oppositions territory; poor tactics and lack of coaching from Ole there. However, on the whole he's still more composed and assured on it than Lindelof.
I thought it was a poor game from Bailly simply because of his (lack of) involvement in both conceded goals. Otherwise, I thought he was 'passable' as he has other qualities and at that standard, I'm happy to give him more chances to partner Maguire. Unfortunately, it may come due to Lindelol's injury but I honestly don't think we're losing much there as a like-for-like replacement.