One thing is squad depth another is a happy, well functioned and motivated squad. How are they gonna keep all these star players happy ?
Not sure you can say that about Chelsea, they might be grim, but as a club they a have a hell of a lot more to them the hollow City project.They pay a massive price for it though. There is no emotion and no sentiment. No real identity.
Yeah I think it’s a funny and ridiculous use of money on someone who isn’t a sure thing in the slightest. He could do brilliantly, but for that sort of money, he must. Well to a normal club, doesn’t seem to matter to them.
"Star" players? How many star players did they bought in reality? All these players are only highly potential players. And nothing else.One thing is squad depth another is a happy, well functioned and motivated squad. How are they gonna keep all these star players happy ?
Although Fernandez started and starred for Argentina's team as they beat France in the World Cup final, while Camavinga was on the France bench.
Genuine question for everyone out there - who, if anyone, seems a better prospect in central midfield out there right now than Fernandez?
Even more so, are there any top drawer young CMs who aren't yet already at a big club that won't sell a la Barca or Real?
One mentioned might be Caicedo, though Fernandez currently seems a better prospect than him. Are there any other possibilities a bit younger e.g. just making their debuts?
If Chelsea get Enzo and Barca won't sell FDJ, who can Utd get to replace /support Eriksen or Casemiro in the next season or two? And please not Rice.
In before "lets see how you react when you have your oil money".
They haven't bought one star."Star" players? How many star players did they bought in reality? All these players are only highly potential players. And nothing else.
True, but if the market is bonkers then you have to get creative and that's what they're doing. The problem for me is them and City were a huge part of inflating the market in the first place. So they've kind of made their bed under the previous ownership and now they have to deal with the consequences under a new ownership model that presumably is still looking to profit in the long term. It's not really anything that we couldn't achieve ourselves with decent owners.Given they're most likely not going to be in the Champions League next year, they'll put 3 generations of his family on contract to comply with FFP. Bohelynomics.
Not sure you can say that about Chelsea, they might be grim, but as a club they a have a hell of a lot more to them the hollow City project.
They had Russian murderous cnut as an owner for 2 decades. Any adult Chelsea fan is a cnutNot sure you can say that about Chelsea, they might be grim, but as a club they a have a hell of a lot more to them the hollow City project.
Not sure you can say that about Chelsea, they might be grim, but as a club they a have a hell of a lot more to them the hollow City project.
The French midfield is substantially better that the Argie midfield though. And Fernández is a better fit for top level football right now because he has developed more positional sense than Camavinga, but he isn't more talented. In a few years, Camavinga will be better I reckon.Although Fernandez started and starred for Argentina's team as they beat France in the World Cup final, while Camavinga was on the France bench.
Genuine question for everyone out there - who, if anyone, seems a better prospect in central midfield out there right now than Fernandez?
Even more so, are there any top drawer young CMs who aren't yet already at a big club that won't sell a la Barca or Real?
One mentioned might be Caicedo, though Fernandez currently seems a better prospect than him. Are there any other possibilities a bit younger e.g. just making their debuts?
If Chelsea get Enzo and Barca won't sell FDJ, who can Utd get to replace /support Eriksen or Casemiro in the next season or two? And please not Rice.
True, but if the market is bonkers then you have to get creative and that's what they're doing. The problem for me is them and City were a huge part of inflating the market in the first place. So they've kind of made their bed under the previous ownership and now they have to deal with the consequences under a new ownership model that presumably is still looking to profit in the long term. It's not really anything that we couldn't achieve ourselves with decent owners.
It's an incredibly risky and novel strategy to have players on these deals for huge transfer fees and to be going so hard in the market but it is outside of the box, I'll give them that.
For that money you are talking generational players. Someone who can change the game on his own, can Enzo possibly do that?
How Chelsea are able to spend 600m in a season is a joke, something has to give surely?
Imagine the pressure on the manager now.
They’ve managed to make themselves footballs biggest spoilt joke in very quick time to be fair.I used to think they did but not anymore
They’ve managed to make themselves footballs biggest spoilt joke in very quick time to be fair.
he has played 1 season in a top European league. What's all this "best players in his position" predictions all about?He doesnt have to be 'generational' (whatever that exactly is) but if Enzo is part of the Chelsea midfield for 10 years and during that period among the best players in his position i would argue that it is money well spent.
Edit, well if you have that amount and if you can work within the rules of FFP. FFP doesnt seem an issue at all for Chelsea...
Indeed. And you know what, I wouldn’t trade any of it.
Much sooner have a lad from Manchester who cost us nothing banging in the goals in front of 75k each week.
He is brilliant kid with lot of potential. 100m is way too much. He isn't ready to take over Chelsea midfield now.The French midfield is substantially better that the Argie midfield though. And Fernández is a better fit for top level football right now because he has developed more positional sense than Camavinga, but he isn't more talented. In a few years, Camavinga will be better I reckon.
For all we know, Mainoo/Hannibal may end up being on the same level of Fernández. I don't see Fernández as being a "generational" talent that is worth over £100m so I feel that there are young players out there lurking in underage sides across the world that can reach his level with the right development.
He joined Benfica in June so it's only been half a season technically.he has played 1 season in a top European league. What's all this "best players in his position" predictions all about?
The release clause is €120m or £105m in full. Sounds like they're probably trying to get an agreement to pay in instalments?is £105m the release clause?
If so, then this surely will go ahead now.
He doesnt have to be 'generational' (whatever that exactly is) but if Enzo is part of the Chelsea midfield for 10 years and during that period among the best players in his position i would argue that it is money well spent.
Edit, well if you have that amount and if you can work within the rules of FFP. FFP doesnt seem an issue at all for Chelsea...
That’ll always mean more. Bless them though they’re having fun with this football manager nonsense.
It'll be north of 700m when including the deals already set for the summer.If this goes through they'll have spent 600m euro since summer. Thats more than all of La Liga.
Sorry, but that's not possible
The release clause is €120m or £105m in full. Sounds like they're probably trying to get an agreement to pay in instalments?
Or else I'd imagine the noise would simply be "Chelsea activate Fernandez release clause"
Nunez and Antony are similiar examples. Both had one good season and went for 100 mil.I simply can’t believe players like Caicedo and Enzo who have only played about 30 competitive games each so far in the european leagues would cost at least 80M upwards
Why do you think Chelsea are a small club..do you really think that. Around the world they are a massive club,I would say.Why is he so keen to go there? Don’t get it at all. Small club with no wide exposure. Go to a real club in the summer and be an actual star.
Put some respect on Antony. He did well for two whole seasons I'll have you know!Nunez and Antony are similiar examples. Both had one good season and went for 100 mil.
It is not my money and shit but it really annoys me. 100 mil should be a price for proven, world class players like Kane, Casemiro, Kdb etc....players who go straight into team and make difference. You don't spend 100 mil on bloody potential.