Sassy Colin
Death or the gladioli!
We all know they're going to bowl us out on the final day.
We all know they're going to bowl us out on the final day.
It has been raining with more predicted for tommorow.
So you don't think they'll bat all day and win?Hameed man...
Crawley good knock so far.
Just need a partnership to see us out. Here's hoping.
He's amazing when he comes off. Sadly his first class average of under 31 is shows how rarely he does.I like the look of Crawley. Selectors should back him. As for Malan, don't think he is a test batsmen. Poor poor shot that was.
Maybe if the Aussies get pissed at lunch.So you don't think they'll bat all day and win?
I like the look of Crawley. Selectors should back him. As for Malan, don't think he is a test batsmen. Poor poor shot that was.
Probably not even then t.b.h.Maybe if the Aussies get pissed at lunch.
The latter three of which are injured.Probably not even then t.b.h.
All basically on Root, Stokes, Bairstow, Buttler now.
Do you mean Adam or the bloke played twice for Aylesbury United in 1959/1960?I thought it might be worth staying up for a bit listening to TMS in the hope that Crawley and Root might put a partnership together. Oh well.
Was that Ian Gilchrist co-commentating earlier? Seemed to have some interesting stuff to say.
Do you mean Adam or the bloke played twice for Aylesbury United in 1959/1960?
http://www.aylesburyunitedfc.co.uk/players/ian-gilchrist/
Chappell?It was Ian somebody
He's amazing when he comes off. Sadly his first class average of under 31 is shows how rarely he does.
EDIT - In tests he has played 28 innings before this one, with no not outs, and over a third of his runs came in one knock.
I was curious and it is very true, I make it the fewest centuries from those on that list other than he is 8 and I think the lowest average is a tad over 40. I'd certainly take that right now.Yes, one knock, but 260-odd against Pakistan puts you in esteemed company. There won't be many players who've scored 250 against them who have had poor careers. To me that's better than having 5 50s and 60s like a Mark Stoneman because it shows you he's capable of something significant.
His figures aren't anything to shout about but he's still only 23.
I'm not fully sold on him because we've had players in the past like Vince who have looked technically good, but for one reason or another they have not scored enough runs. In the case of Crawley, I've been disappointed in the past with his shot selection and attacking the wrong balls. I was impressed with him today, though. He played with authority and got a decent yorker.
I was curious and it is very true, I make it the fewest centuries from those on that list other than he is 8 and I think the lowest average is a tad over 40. I'd certainly take that right now.
Yeah, he was good today and it was a very good ball. Play another innings like that in the next match and I'll start hoping but at the moment it still seems believable we'll be waiting a long time before we see his next good effort.
Required rate up at 10 an over now. Will be tricky.
Marnus 'I heard a noise' Labuschagne burns another review.
Nice jinxEngland got this
Nice jinx