redtilded121
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2007
- Messages
- 1,076
another 4 ,enough of the short stuff for now i think
no follow-on what the feck...
Bad mistake, as Ian Chappell said: 'If you've got your boot on their throat keep it there'. Aussies would never have done that.
I think we're just pushing that foot down now...
We can't lose now we've decided to bat again, and there's along time left in the match.
I think we're just pushing that foot down now...
We can't lose now we've decided to bat again, and there's along time left in the match.
My first thought was a bad decision and we should of put them back in , but looking at the bowlers struggle ,it could be a good one and work in our favour.
ARRRGGGHHH feck OFF ENGLAND
Rancid decision. Hopefully it doesn't matter but I'm sick to fecking death of us not enforcing follow ons and giving an all but beaten opponent a new lease of life to get at least a draw out of the game
How many times must be tits up these positions before we fecking learn eh?
feck off you wumEven though he may not actually be English, Strauss is the perfect captain for England. Totally gutless.
Even though he may not actually be English, Strauss is the perfect captain for England. Totally gutless.
With two days left the Aussies will probably be 500 behind, giving England enough time and runs to bowl them out. The worry would've been, the Aussies getting 450+ after following on, leaving England chasing 200+ on the last day. So, it's the logical decision.
Would be good if we can get 450-500 infront by lunch Sunday and them have .
2 sessions and all day Monday to get them out.
feck off you wum