Fake news
That's good news, according to Ronaldo we only have old shitty stuff to show people. The Jacuzzi is just disgusting.
Fake news
As Barca and Madrid, no. For a 16 year old kid, United? Possibly We have been Champions of Europe in the time the kid was old enough to have memories at least.
The Jersey alone is not the magnet it once was. Athletes today, not just in football, do NOT care about the history and “prestige” that history once afforded. I would argue it is dying a bit for Barca now as well, and maybe only Madrid really has IT anymore.
That’s why PSG is n the top 3. It’s about the money, the overall project and the showcase.
Except for Madrid. I truly think they are the only team that can “pull anyone they want” by name alone anymore.
I told you guys we were WAY ahead of many clubs on Endrick in July. We were very close to buying a club with the ability to buy Endrick early and avoid all this for awhile. We’ve eaten in his home a ton, spent time with his family and coaches, put in the work building relationships. Romano isn’t putting us in that top 3 on a lark.
People think these guys would care about things like who George Best played …. And they just don’t.
If you guys were in the position of a City, and could combine that with your name value? That would be a different story. But you aren’t.
I still think Madrid will edge it and sign him eventually. But if we signed him, i dont think itd be a huge surprise. Given Boehly et al's willingness to spend and Thiago Silva spending time with Endrick and his family at Cobham. Again, as you alluded to, he and his family may prefer what PSG offer as a package for example, and they may have a big influence over the players decisionDespite you being a bit of a Boehly / Clearlake cheerleader, I think you are correct on a lot of things here.
I don't think it really matters too much that Utd and Liverpool are bigger clubs traditionally than the likes of City and Chelsea for a 16 year old. What matters more is where the club is at now, what you can sell to the player and his family more specifically of where the club is going, how you'll look after the player, what environment you will build round him, how you see him integrating for the first team etc. Ironically, the 1 thing that might influence a 16 year old forward is the presence and influence of 1 of the greatest players ever in Ronaldo, and he's just put a massive negative slant on that.
Unfortunately though, a big part of the decision is how much money the club will throw at the player and his family, and we know Boehlys Chelsea won't be shy at that.
It won't surprise anyone on here to know that from a sporting perspective, I think Arsenal could be 1 of the best options for Endrick. A young team looking on the up, a club and management team that's looking more stable, a Brazilian Sporting Director, a manager that can speak some Portuguese, players such as Jesus, Gabriel, Martinelli and Marquinhos, could even sign his current club mate in Danilo. Not got a lot of depth in the forward areas so a clear path to the first team.
The only thing missing is that Arsenal won't throw money at him and his family. Like you say, theres a reason why Chelsea, PSG and Real are seen as the 3 favourites.
A 16 yr old player has only really known City and Chelsea being the most successful in England in his lifetime.
I still think Madrid will edge it and sign him eventually. But if we signed him, i dont think itd be a huge surprise. Given Boehly et al's willingness to spend and Thiago Silva spending time with Endrick and his family at Cobham. Again, as you alluded to, he and his family may prefer what PSG offer as a package for example, and they may have a big influence over the players decision
The notion that player X picks Liverpool or Utd over chelsea and City due to history and prestige is nonsense these days. Back in the 90s it was a thing yes, but not in the recent era. A 16 yr old player has only really known City and Chelsea being the most successful in England in his lifetime.
What are the chances United's sale is finalised before Endrick's future is settled? Have a feeling the Glazers will be pinching pennies even more than normal now that they are selling the club.If we do get new, wealthy ownership then this is a move we may be afforded the luxury to explore.
What are the chances United's sale is finalised before Endrick's future is settled?
Doubt it'll disrupt the clubs daily running. It's not like the Glazers put a penny in anyway.What are the chances United's sale is finalised before Endrick's future is settled? Have a feeling the Glazers will be pinching pennies even more than normal now that they are selling the club.
While everyone is clamouring for Endrick. We should really go and snap up Angelo Gabriel who I believe is the more talented out of the 2. More raw but definitely more talented.
Brazil really do seem to have an endless pool of talented attackers. It's actually incredible.
Way more technical. Endrick is a powerful player and a freak at that age and is more polished despite being younger, my personal opinion though is that Gabriel has a higher ceiling.Why do you think he’s more talented than Endrick?
Way more technical. Endrick is a powerful player and a freak at that age and is more polished despite being younger, my personal opinion though is that Gabriel has a higher ceiling.
Again it's my personal opinion but Angelo Gabriel is a top talent in his own right (Last year he became the youngest goal scorer in copa libertadores history at 16) and probably the best dribbler to come out of Brazil since Vini jr and while everyone is clamouring for Endrick we have a high chance of snapping him up. Andre Trindad is another one we should be looking at, although a completely different position.
Vini. It helps that he's more explosive but it's close.Thanks for the insight, would you say Vini was a better dribbler than Rodrygo?
Chelsea’s record to integrate youth is better than any of the other teams he’s looking at, so this is frankly an odd statement. Now if you throw in Barca that’s different, but we have more Academy players playing first team than any of those others.Most successful would certainly throw Liverpool into that same argument. There's likely many decisions that factor into a players decision. None of us can give an accurate account regarding the choices that determines a players decision because none of us have the experience. It is therefore mostly assumption.
There's also the purpose behind why the said player is moving for example a young player who has seen Chelsea's record to integrate youth into the first team would be skeptical (alongside academy players sold to find first team football) so almost every club has perspectives that are for and against their propositions.
Ultimately we will have to wait and see what his decisions are and why he made those particular choices.
Way more technical. Endrick is a powerful player and a freak at that age and is more polished despite being younger, my personal opinion though is that Gabriel has a higher ceiling.
Again it's my personal opinion but Angelo Gabriel is a top talent in his own right (Last year he became the youngest goal scorer in copa libertadores history at 16) and probably the best dribbler to come out of Brazil since Vini jr and while everyone is clamouring for Endrick we have a high chance of snapping him up. Andre Trindad is another one we should be looking at, although a completely different position.
To be honest, I haven't seen much of them as they haven't yet played for the first team yet. I usually keep an eye out on the Brazilian Serie A and not youth football there. From what I've heard they are both more physical and more direct than Gabriel, while Gabriel is more of a creative player. Estevao is especially highly rated though, so we should see him make an app for the first team soon. I can't tell you their playing style and how their game will translate to adult football though...Thank you. Great to gain some educated insight. Out of the talents coming through, I have only really heard of Gabriel, Estevao, Endrick, and Luis Guillherme, either through this thread or elsewhere. How would you rate each of them in terms of current and past talents? Seen a fair amount of hype about each of them, with Endrick getting the most by far. I’ve heard your thoughts on Gabriel and Endrick but would love to hear what you think of the other two.
While everyone is clamouring for Endrick. We should really go and snap up Angelo Gabriel who I believe is the more talented out of the 2. More raw but definitely more talented.
Brazil really do seem to have an endless pool of talented attackers. It's actually incredible.
I still think Madrid will edge it and sign him eventually. But if we signed him, i dont think itd be a huge surprise. Given Boehly et al's willingness to spend and Thiago Silva spending time with Endrick and his family at Cobham. Again, as you alluded to, he and his family may prefer what PSG offer as a package for example, and they may have a big influence over the players decision
The notion that player X picks Liverpool or Utd over chelsea and City due to history and prestige is nonsense these days. Back in the 90s it was a thing yes, but not in the recent era. A 16 yr old player has only really known City and Chelsea being the most successful in England in his lifetime.
Yes, that was done before Barca went on a summer shopping spree. Barcelona will not spend 35 m on Angelo Gabriel.Barcelona have a €35M purchase option for Angelo Gabriel.
Yes, that was done before Barca went on a summer shopping spree. Barcelona will not spend 35 m on Angelo Gabriel.
Chelseawe ?
It's not. Rodrygo has far cleaner technique and touch but Vini is just so quick and explosive it makes him nigh unstoppable if he has space to run. Rodrygo is a good dribbler, but not greatVini. It helps that he's more explosive but it's close.
I was comparing them when they were both in the Brazilian league. Rodrygo dribbles far less for Madrid than he did for Santos, whether that's because of instructions or the quality of the league I don't know. He also has more to his game and can create so doesn't need to rely solely on dribbling.It's not. Rodrygo has far cleaner technique and touch but Vini is just so quick and explosive it makes him nigh unstoppable if he has space to run. Rodrygo is a good dribbler, but not great
who? by we you mean chelsea?Not Endrick but appears we have almost signed andrey Santos from Vasco da Gama
I think it’s nonsense to you because your club doesn’t have the history and prestige. That can’t be bought.
Whilst I agree a players view can very much differ depending on their age and what they have lived through clubs like United, Liverpool, Real, Barca, Bayern will always have that romanticism attached given the history and pedigree the clubs have.
It’s equally silly to suggest none of that matters as it is to say current success/potential and financial packages don’t either.
He’ll move to the club that ticks most of the boxes at the end of the day and whilst Chelsea definitely tick quite a few they don’t offer more than any other English team and they also lack plenty.
The change in historic attention span of modern athletes is … remarkable really. I was involved in .. “recruitment” of athletes in a different sport financially . Even in the late 90’s there was still a lot of selling the “prestige” of a brand. Players dreamed, for real, of playing for certain teams, they knew the history, even particular famous plays. By 2010 that had changed completely. I’m not sure if it was driven solely by the internet and birth of social media, or what happened. But to most of these kids, if it happened more than 10 or 15 years ago? They. Do. Not. Care. Fans like to think they care about such things, because the die hard fans themselves do.
Recent success and the profile of the players that sign for a team in recent history plays a bigger part. Top targets want to join other top targets. That, and the overall plan for the player and the team, especially as it’s related to them by the agent.
If you took ten 15 year old players in Brazil and asked them which team was more “prestigious” : United or City … as much as it may pain, most would probably say City. Heck, PSG would probably get a mention, and aside from a “cup winners cup” I’m not even familiar with, the best they have is a CL runner up and some Ligue Un titles. The biggest draw they have, to young players (aside from straight money) is the fact that people automatically associate someone they sign as being top 5 or so in their position, whether true or not.
And that’s a reality the people at United and (hopefully) your new owners will have to recognize before they can fix the problem.
On a related note: apparently we just beat PSG, Barca, and Newcastle to Andrey Santos from Vasco. Idk how good a thing that is, but the statement from his people was “the Blues project was more consistent with the players expectations than the other clubs”… nothing romantic about following in past footsteps, or fulfilling long held dreams. It is what it is.
who? by we you mean chelsea?
Kayky signed for City didn't he?The latest news is that Barcelona follows Angelo closely and they see a great future.
Barcelona also had a €20M option for Kayky and eventually signed for Almeria (€7M).
There's 2, he's talking about the centre back not the right winger. I think it's actually spelt Kaiky.Kayky signed for City didn't he?
My bad, I didn't realise there was two.There's 2, he's talking about the centre back not the right winger.
Kayky signed for City didn't he?