Can’t think of one reason as to why he’d pick Chelsea if I’m honest
All debates about club status aside, I'm sure they'll likely offer the best financial package to the family.
I had heard they offered Omari Hutchinson about 7 times what Arsenal had offered him as an example, and he's not really high profile.
I had heard they offered Omari Hutchinson about 7 times what Arsenal had offered him as an example, and he's not really high profile.
The only report I can find on Omari Hutchinson's salary at Chelsea is £14K/wk and according to the same report his first contract was a £2K/wk deal at Arsenal.
So yeah, that would put it at roughly 7 times more than the first pro deal he signed when he turned 17 but surely he'd have got a lot more than the same £2K/wk last summer at Arsenal too if he'd stayed? He'd already been promoted to train with the Arsenal first team squad for the second half of 21/22 season and even made the bench in the EPL a bunch of times so despite not making his debut yet I don't think there was ever any scenario where he signgs for the same terms as his first professional contract whether it was at Arsenal or another club. It's very likely Chelsea lured him with more money than Arsenal offered him for the extension but I call bullshit on the factor of 7.
Either way Hutchinson was a very low money and low risk move for Chelsea. A free transfer signing on a three year contract at £14K/wk plus any undisclosed signing bonuses still puts the total package around £3M at the very most for the whole contract duration. If he proves to be good enough to play for Chelsea that cost is nothing and even if he doesn't then the club can try to sell him in 2024 for more than the salary costs. Worst case scenario he fails to make any impact, leaves on a free in 2025 and we get nothing but even then the loss is basically a drop in the ocean.
Haven't watched the academy games this season but apparently Omari has been very good. In the last few games before the WC break he was on the bench for the first team and has been a part of the training camp now that the first team training has gotten back underway with the players not in Qatar. Could even make his first team debut sometime soon when the season continues. Good chance for him to impress Potter with the likes of Mount, Havertz, Pulisic, Ziyech all still away and the last two probably being on the chopping block for the January window.
He’s 16. Our stadium expansion and renovation would done by the time he was 19 or 20 at latest. Chelsea also averages highest monetary amount per visitor of any team in the PL from the last time the figures were tallied in 2019, and one of the highest match day income averages overall even with the smaller capacity. The common theme of “empty Chelsea” just isn’t true .They do play a part but I don’t see how that favours Chelsea given how poor in the transfer market they have been?
Players care about all kinds of things. I mean even as silly as it sounds would you rather play in front of 75k people each week at Old Trafford or 39k at the Bridge? It’s a no brainer.
Can’t think of one reason as to why he’d pick Chelsea if I’m honest
I think you've said this about 20x in this thread
Now watch him pick Chelsea and win the young POTY in his first season
Just trying to counter the OTT Boehly fans here.
The balance of the universe needs restoring.
On a serious note though I don’t particularly see why Chelsea would beat a City, United or Liverpool to his signing? Other than the age old London thing that gets thrown around.
The only report I can find on Omari Hutchinson's salary at Chelsea is £14K/wk and according to the same report his first contract was a £2K/wk deal at Arsenal.
So yeah, that would put it at roughly 7 times more than the first pro deal he signed when he turned 17 but surely he'd have got a lot more than the same £2K/wk last summer at Arsenal too if he'd stayed? He'd already been promoted to train with the Arsenal first team squad for the second half of 21/22 season and even made the bench in the EPL a bunch of times so despite not making his debut yet I don't think there was ever any scenario where he signgs for the same terms as his first professional contract whether it was at Arsenal or another club. It's very likely Chelsea lured him with more money than Arsenal offered him for the extension but I call bullshit on the factor of 7.
Either way Hutchinson was a very low money and low risk move for Chelsea. A free transfer signing on a three year contract at £14K/wk plus any undisclosed signing bonuses still puts the total package around £3M at the very most for the whole contract duration. If he proves to be good enough to play for Chelsea that cost is nothing and even if he doesn't then the club can try to sell him in 2024 for more than the salary costs. Worst case scenario he fails to make any impact, leaves on a free in 2025 and we get nothing but even then the loss is basically a drop in the ocean.
Haven't watched the academy games this season but apparently Omari has been very good. In the last few games before the WC break he was on the bench for the first team and has been a part of the training camp now that the first team training has gotten back underway with the players not in Qatar. Could even make his first team debut sometime soon when the season continues. Good chance for him to impress Potter with the likes of Mount, Havertz, Pulisic, Ziyech all still away and the last two probably being on the chopping block for the January window.
Hes 16... and not got an Eu Passport so he cant sign for a couple of years anyway can he?
I think you have to be 18 years old to apply for a UK work visa as well
So most probably we have 2 years of stories linking us and everybody else to moves that cant happen before at 18 he joins Madrid or Barca
There hasn't been strong links to either of the other teams though and they all have their priorities. I definitely can't see United entering the fray, dropping that kind of money for a player that is not likely to be in a position to excel in a league like the premiership for at least 2-4 years.Just trying to counter the OTT Boehly fans here.
The balance of the universe needs restoring.
On a serious note though I don’t particularly see why Chelsea would beat a City, United or Liverpool to his signing? Other than the age old London thing that gets thrown around.
GOAT VibesMaybe he reminds him of the PES 5 Adriano
Real Madrid are wonderkid hoarders
GARNACHOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!If you're after a South American and your competition is Real Madrid/Barcelona, might as well give up
I like Garnacho but if he does fulfil his potential and Real Madrid are after him, he's gone....GARNACHOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!
The best of the lot.
60 million on a 16 year old is an insane gamble.
He could be the next big thing or he could equally become another Kerlon or Barbosa,
60 million on a 16 year old is an insane gamble.
He could be the next big thing or he could equally become another Kerlon or Barbosa,
Chelsea fans were getting hyped about this kid.
For sure.It's a gamble. Could turn out to be Vinicious/Rodrygo as well.
Emerson Royal and Semedo proof there’s always a willing buyer from the PremThen you pap him off to some English team with deep pockets for £30M-£40M who think it's just Real holding him back and he'd be worth the gamble.
Emerson Royal and Semedo proof there’s always a willing buyer from the Prem
For sure.
60 million is just a ton of money to spend on potential, Real are generally pretty patient with their young signings, I couldn't see an English team wanting to spend 60mill without an instant return.
Just a gamble on someone so young.
Well considering Madrid's recent success in buying highly rated youngsters from Brazil (Vini and rodrygo), you can't blame them for going for Endrick who's definitely more highly rated than both.If you don't spot them early it's impossible to get them. 60 million euros is not a huge amount.
Real Madrid spend more than 120 million euros on Hazard and more than 60 million euros on Jovic. Both supposed to give instant success turned out to be shit.
The strategy of buying young has turned out to be succesful for RM in recent years.
Vini, Odegaard, Rodrygo, Velverde, Camavinga, Militao all turned out to be good players. Odegaard wanted to move on and is doing decently for Arsenal. There are obviously failures as well as its impossible to get all transfers right.
I know all that, but 60mill is still a huge amount, no matter which team it is!If you don't spot them early it's impossible to get them. 60 million euros is not a huge amount.
Real Madrid spend more than 120 million euros on Hazard and more than 60 million euros on Jovic. Both supposed to give instant success turned out to be shit.
The strategy of buying young has turned out to be succesful for RM in recent years.
Vini, Odegaard, Rodrygo, Velverde, Camavinga, Militao all turned out to be good players. Odegaard wanted to move on and is doing decently for Arsenal. There are obviously failures as well as its impossible to get all transfers right.
We spent similar amounts on Vini and Rodrygo and a bit less on Reinier. The success of the first two, and the obvious hype and talent of this kid, meant we were never going to shy away from it. The only possible deal-breaker was the anti-Haaland clause he demanded
He doesn't want to play for a team with Haaland since he sees that as a road-block to first team football. Understandably soWhat's this?