Wow.
What are you talking about?
The thing you've ignored during your whole diatribe is I haven't said we said were going to only buy 'young & British'. I think it's pretty stupid to brief we are going in one direction when it's impossible to do so. You're on a misinformed tangent against something I haven't actually said but this is RedCaf so. . .
How exactly is focusing on signing the best emerging English/British talent "simply a horrendous/dangerous message to deliver"?
Because it's an impossible thing to do. We haven't got a class of '92 coming through that will be the backbone of the club and £130mil gets you 2 British players these days - the 'British Premium' is stronger than ever and we're in no position to be turning down talented players based on their birthrights so why say it at all.
It should be, just buy the best players we can but no we need to feed the fanbase an empty platitude.
We are an English club, and we've always had a good core of English/British players, even under SAF. There is a great array of British talent coming through the ranks at the moment, so it makes sense to put some focus in this area.
Is there? A great array?
You're now into the credits of British players as if I said they're bad - which I haven't. I've no issue with signing a player of any nationality. This isn't the mid-nineties where SAF could go to most British players [Shearer says hello] and sign them. I've not said we would only buy British or derided British talent but me thinking we should go for the best player regardless of nationality seems to have offended you at some point.
You're again going off in a direction my posts haven't gone.
This is not only completely irrelevant to my initial point, but also completely unfounded. British players will of course demand a premium, that's nothing new.
Calling Tielemans a better summer target than Longstaff isn't a slight on British players. Somehow we're now onto the British Premium for players. . .
Just because the club didn't sign a young and foreign midfielder in the last transfer window, it doesn't mean they won't in the next transfer window(s). We're being linked with foreign players all the time.
When did I say it didn't?
I said the 'young & British' briefing has already gone out the window 8/9 games into the season because Emre Can was left out of the Juve UCL & available in the summer, if he were the answer he should have been bought then. Similarly to another non-young & British Juve player, Mandzukic, who were are linked with again.
I've not said we would only sign players of British origin, what are you on about?
You do realise this is a thread about Emre Can, a 25 year old foreign midfielder who we've been linked to right?
Again, what are you on about?
Emre Can's age and nationality are concerns of yours not mine; if he's good enough I'm more interested in his production on the pitch than his birth certificate.
What are you suggesting with this comment?
Some sort of racism or something?
Again, another misinterpretation. The overtones in my post. Racism or something?
My stance, for clarification [not misinterpretation].
Saying we are going ‘young & British’ when we should simply be going for ‘good players’ is ridiculous. Some of the clubs best players & cornerstones of the team have come from outside the country. I would much rather have a Vidic than any CB we currently have but would also much rather have a Rio aswell.
Look at the 2 best teams currently in the country; nationalism didn't get in the way of squad construction.
You've honestly lost the plot on this one and drawn it out longer than necessary. Your argument isn't based on what I'm saying so I'm more than happy to leave this here.
Yeah one signing makes that null and void.
How dopey do you have to be to believe every signing would be young and British?
Honestly?
Where have I said this?
You’ve assumed I believed every signing would be young & British then called me ‘dopey’. How. . . ironic.
As we are encouraged to criticize the post not the poster, your post is an idiot.
Don’t quote me to misinterpret me.