Amazing how the only person who apparently didn’t think that this is a bad idea is Musk.
Indeed, it is very risky. Although, my position is team specific and presumably would go under ‘critical’ (metaverse related AI), but would still be quite risky to take anything in Meta right now.
Of course, I will likely not get an offer in the first place.
Yes, of course.This isn't in any way meant as an accusation, but have you at all considered the ethical implications of working at Meta? I don't hold individual employees responsible for the actions of Meta, but... I think it would bother me too much.
This is very hot topic in the industry and is turning almost political now. I can say that the majority of engineers and researches I know want to stay as far away form Meta as possible.This isn't in any way meant as an accusation, but have you at all considered the ethical implications of working at Meta? I don't hold individual employees responsible for the actions of Meta, but... I think it would bother me too much.
And yet they have the second best AI team in the world (after Alphabet). I know dozens of researchers there, and have yet to know one who has left for ethical reasons.This is very hot topic in the industry and is turning almost political now. I can say that the majority of engineers and researches I know want to stay as far away form Meta as possible.
Sure. They also created PyTorch which made many lives easier. It's more related to the company one keeps for these opinions.And yet they have the second best AI team in the world (after Alphabet). I know dozens of researchers there, and have yet to know one who has left for ethical reasons.
Ratner? Would come close although a smaller companyI am trying to think of anything similar in corporate history, but I can't think of any similar examples of self sabotage of such a large company in such a small amount of time.
Man United during Woodward era?I am trying to think of anything similar in corporate history, but I can't think of any similar examples of self sabotage of such a large company in such a small amount of time.
MEN!
Bot!
H-how did you know?!
As much of a douchebag this guy is, I think he's done well with the twitter purchase. There's a lot of value in the platform with a unique feature set that I think has been under utilised by the previous management, and over a 10 year span it can increase significantly in value if the execution is right. I held stock in Twitter for quite a while, but over the last 5-7 years it just seemed like nothing was over done to improve twitter.
Musk is smart and ruthless in business if nothing else, so I expect the twitter purchase to return good value for him. Shame because he is really quite unlikeable, but I suppose the traits that make him so are useful to have in business.
When you really think about it, it's actually hilarious that Elon just went in there and did a bunch of crap within the first week. Any CEO worth his salt would initiate some kind of strategy process upon taking over the reins to better understand the current state, the various strategic options and their potential risks/rewards. This would probably take at least half a year and include a bunch of market research. At the same time he would assess the leadership team, perhaps make a few changes early on, but then get the rest of them onboard with his plan.
Elon went in there, eliminated entire functions, alienated the rest of the leadership, and launched a new product based purely on gut feel (and a Twitter exchange with Stephen King) - all while whining on Twitter. Any claims of financial urgency are obviously bullshit - he could cover the operating losses for decades if he wanted to. He's clearly not a good executive.
Probably more than 8.Is that accurate?! What was it valued at when he paid the 44?
Is that accurate?! What was it valued at when he paid the 44?
Probably more than 8.
I mean, the company is delisted. There is no market value anymore. You can't just do a valuation like that.
The funny thing is, that the company is probably significantly more valuable to another owner, because Musk is alienating to users and advertisers alike.
There's this, but I have absolutely no idea what much of this means...Ya, I had a quick Google and couldn't find consensus. Still bonkers.
Bot-badabadabadoo-belidabbelydabbladabbladabblabab-belibabbelibabbelibabbelabbelo-doobelidoo.I'm Botman!
There's this, but I have absolutely no idea what much of this means...
thirty? wasnt the bid something like a 33% premium to stock market valuation (when he made the bid)Is that accurate?! What was it valued at when he paid the 44?
SORRY IT'S THE BONEBot-badabadabadoo-belidabbelydabbladabbladabblabab-belibabbelibabbelibabbelabbelo-doobelidoo.
SORRY IT'S THE BONE
Thread:
There's this, but I have absolutely no idea what much of this means...
Whether she’s right or wrong, I can help feeling she had quite a few of those bullets in the chamber waiting to go.
When you are mostly correct in predicting things it's really hard (for some) to admit they've been wrong , so that's a hill they are willing to die for. I reckon for most of the smarter folk that's the reason, and there is always those true cultists who have no values of their own but memcpy the entire value system (or nothing) of their chosen celebrity.Had a discussion on another forum, a tech one which doesn't allow political discourse so unfortunately the thread did get closed.
Couple of members were right up Elon's arse. Holy feck.
Back & forth over the blue tick fiasco, really reminds me of arguing with right wingers. Except in this case I know the guy knows his stuff in regards to cybersecurity & sys ad.
Common sense out the window when people idolise billionaires. Cult following.