Didnt stop you posting in here either, did it?
Elon Musk | Doer of things on X and sad little man
- Thread starter Pogue Mahone
- Start date
Can it be that most speaking against you dont have a wierd hate against a billionaire, but are against him letting nazis back on twitter f.ex? Or are both the same in your eyes?
I ignored emotional and subject comments who earlier claimed they talk hard factsNo, you threw out wild flights of fancy and then wholesale ignored reasoned detailed responses to them.
Edit: Excellent. Cheers. I love it when people admit that their wumming.
By engaging me instead of the lengthy answers of objective facts you got to every point you brought up here, you're just emphasizing again and again that you can't argue against them.
We have a problem then, there should be no wumming. Thanks for highlighting this issue. That's very honest of you.
You got a warning yesterday for insukting someone in this thread. Maybe stay out of it?
Let me just have an aul read.
Yes, not like this one below at all. Not emotional or subject in the slightest.
No, probably just a nutter.
Hence I said all form of extremism
To my understanding, it was said that Twitter will grant amnesty to accounts that have not broken the law. That goes for all political views. I personally disagree with that. But to claim it is one sided and only Nazis are preferred is wild
And then there are people here who claim I am trolling here. Learn how to accept different views buddy, can only help you in life
..... Why does that not work both ways
Is there any reason why you are so terrified of trying your own advice?
OK, so to turn this around and get some balance to the discussion. How is it better for you?
Also, you still seem to have missed the answers to the more factual replies to you despite the reminders from other posters, I'm sure you'll get to them soon.
I was just wondering if it might be the case that posters you claim have wierd hate against Elon, just dont like nazis beeing able to post tweets?
Yes please. People spent time writing considered replies, they deserve responses.
Quite a few showed a weird hate against Elon
What makes it wierd? I dont seem to recall many here said anything before he took over Twitter and started letting Nazis back on. And then its not wierd imo.
It is when you read the last few pages and people get upset at his tweets
Ok, but you surley agree that if someone letting nazis use their platform, that happens to be one of the world biggest, that affects how you look at what that person say on the same platform?
I'm not trolling, I genuinely hate twitter and it's short-formism.
It may be a shock to you petal but I disagree with almost everyone all the time and don't feel your compulsion to be an arse about it. (Although I can be when necessary.) It's a policy that can only help you in life and in this thread.
I've suggested you don't post in here, which was a polite and gentle way of trying to mod the thread.
Another good policy to help you in life is learning to read a room.
@Escobar can I get an answer to this? If you're being honest in this thread you can't simply not answer to some things.
Gatekeeping security behind monetization, great idea bro.
Musk is a self-claimed free speech fundamentalist - with the result that neo-nazis (such as Donald Trump) - among others - more easily can spread their words in social media. Being a fundamentalist when it comes to free speech, however, does not disqualify you from being a decent person, although I personally would not allow Trump to use Twitter as a platform for his lies - unless you are allowed to tweet from American prisons...
It could be that he made Twitter worse, but for people like me, who does not use Twitter actively, it's not one of life's concerns. Allowing Trump to tweet again, in my eyes, is a far less crime than putting your country's resources in your own pockets - and buy a football club for it. So, based om morals, I'd rather see Musk as our new owner, than some thief from Middle East.
It could be that he made Twitter worse, but for people like me, who does not use Twitter actively, it's not one of life's concerns. Allowing Trump to tweet again, in my eyes, is a far less crime than putting your country's resources in your own pockets - and buy a football club for it. So, based om morals, I'd rather see Musk as our new owner, than some thief from Middle East.
The problem with that is that you're right that he's a self-claimed free speech fundamentalist. In reality there is plenty of evidence that he's been heavily favouring the right. I think people still be upset if he was just allowing everyone to say whatever they wanted, but this is worse.
His leaning to the right may not even be ideological but some tangent of ego and Randian megalomania that manifests as right wing.
What evidence are there that he's favouring the right? Has he ever blocked any tweets from liberals?
I don't agree with his personal political views, but are we at the point now where is evaluate any potential owner based on what political party they support? Do you know who Sir Alex Ferguson votes for? Do you even care?
At least Musk is not from dictatorial family, and building a fortune of selling electrical car must be better than selling oil, no?
I don't want Elon Musk as the new owner of Manchester United, by the way, I prefer Jim Ratcliffe every day of the week, but when people seem to prefer a Qatari sheik over Musk, it tells me the demonisation of Musk has gone too far, or they have no idea what Al Thani represents.
Liberal is not the opposite to right wing. Liberal is the centre in broad terms.
Yeah, well, "liberals" is still a therm used by Trump to describe his opponents. Put in "left wings" then, my argument still stands.
Let's do some research on the Sheik, shall we. I think people have totally lost the plot.
This thread is not about the Sheik tough. It's about the owner of Twitter.
No you didn't. Rado wrote that post right after this one:
Which indeed you didn't reply to.
Your posts in this thread have tended to be very unspecific and evasive. How would you actually reply to these very specific questions?
it was reported
He's peddling every idiotic talking point from chronically online right wingers including completely braindead russian propaganda. It was never about voting.
Boom! Elon just owned that guy on Twitter
In what way was that relevant to the Twitter/Elon thing? That is what I respond to
You can hardly fault @Escobar at this point. The CE forum is like wum heaven. Just an endless feeding frenzy
Just got the 2FA alert telling me to remove my SMS one by March are you fecking kidding me.
are you fecking kidding me.I see a lot of irony when the former Twitter ad boss claims Elon knows nothing about ads yet Twitter was doing nothing before and about to go down. I have been pointing this out in here, that kind of hypocrisis. Wumming is a different thing.You can hardly fault @Escobar at this point. The CE forum is like wum heaven. Just an endless feeding frenzy
Is this like a pretty please type of deal? Can't they just disable it on their end?Just got the 2FA alert telling me to remove my SMS one by March
