Fair enough. That doesn't tally with what I've seen but perhaps I'm wrong.
Perhaps they just weren't very good. Most Icelandic footballers aren't, as I'm sure you'll agree. At least not at PL level. As was said above, they used to be owned by an Icelandic person/company so I'm not surprised a few have passed through the doors.
Dave Kitson has a massive attitude problem, has fallen out with Pulis and has looked utterly shite since joining, despite getting chances. It doesn't really matter how much he cost is if he doesn't do it on the pitch, which he hasn't for Stoke.
Odd man he might be, but I doubt he's racist against Icelandic players or people. He's probably just come to the conclusion - as Harry Redknapp did without being called a racist - that Gudjohnsen didn't offer him enough to justify playing him, or didn't fit in with the way he wanted to play. Tuncay is in a similar position as regards selection. Gudjohnsen was a cracking player in his prime - and may still be - but IMHO his best days are well behind him now.
Actually at the Championship level he was playing at most of them were good enough. I didn't say he was racist towards Icelandic people. I mean, maybe his dad was a soldier in the Cod War but that's very farfetched. I just said he had a thing with them. A word I used because I can't pinpoint it.
Fine they weren't good enough, why did he keep buying them?
And is it possible it's Pulis who's got an attitude problem? How come hard working lads with their heads screwed on tight, one of them a CL, La Liga and PL winner, all have similar things to say about Pulis? How many players, not just Icelandic, have left Stoke very annoyed?
That bold bit is the oddest thing. Everyone knows how Stoke play. Pulis know's it the best. Why the hell did he spend money on those players? Why has he been on the bench 10 matches in a row and not been used once? What's the point. There's no way he'll get match fit without being used. That's impossible.
Btw. he categorally denies playing that football we all see. He said in an interview with us that he had technically gifted players occupying the pitch instead of Tuncay. Walters and Fuller and such.
Sure his best is behind him but I can't believe anyone saying that Tuncay or Eidur should be behind Jonathan Walters in the pecking order.
I've heard from Pulis himself, his reason ands thoughts on the matter, and I've hear from dozen of people saying the other side. I'm convinced Pulis isn't a very nice man to work with. Good reaction from him to Hughes after the Fulham game...