Ballack13 said:the able custodian is predicting a bright time for the Manchester giants.
Ericisgod said:I hope the Glazers aren't watching !
Is it alright if we call him a "United Legend"?
Nooooo pleaseeeeeeeeee !!!!!!!
I've a huge problem with the whole retrospective dismissal of everyone's opinions.
If we took the opinions of people in this thread as they were at the time when we signed a number of players over the last ten years, there isn't one of us who wouldn't be embarrassed.
Without doubt for me!
I've a huge problem with the whole retrospective dismissal of everyone's opinions.
If we took the opinions of people in this thread as they were at the time when we signed a number of players over the last ten years, there isn't one of us who wouldn't be embarrassed.
At the end of the day 34 is not old for a goalkeeper and it's been the same for a very very very long time....
I think your answer highlights the feelings of supporters at present.
How is 34 not considered old for a goalkeeper? By today's standards it isn't but Schmeichel 'retired' from English football at aged 35, Barthez 36, Seaman should have retired about three years sooner than he did.
I think that just because the odd keeper goes on beyond 40, we shouldn't be fooled into thinking it is the 'norm'.
Mid 30's surely IS the time when most goalkeepers retire, isn't it?
I don't think anyone could honestly say they saw VDS staying here that long. I'm sure even Sir Alex or the player himself wouldn't have said as much.
Without doubt for me!
It isn't. If you watched Schmeichel, he 'quit' united not retired as he moved to portugal - at the right time. He made more mistakes in his final season then he ever did but then he played on. However, he was a giant. VDS is a stick in comparison.
No it's not mid 30's, it really depends on a players desire but at top clubs it's naturally harder as one mistake and you're past it not to mention top teams can't afford to make too many mistakes
You have Rooney saying he won't play till he's say mid 30's because of his build. In spite of his energy, but someone like VDS, who had all that experience and who carryed no weight, was always going to be an improvement at the least on who we have before him.
Schmeichel did effectively retire. He wanted an easy life to see out his career in the sun. In the end he missed the game in England and came back.
There are other keepers who either quit, wound down or buggered off to somewhere like the MLS in their twilight years.
If you're saying you foresaw VDS still being at the club beyond 40 and maintaining the same high level of performance then you should seriously do my lottery numbers this week as that would have been a prediction nobody at the time would have made.
I'm sure even the manager saw him as a steady hand on the rudder for two or three years, at most.
Nice video but that MUTV guy has to be the most annoying commentator there is. Thank god for Alan Parry.
Schmeichel 'retired' from English football at aged 35
weird? I could've sworn I saw him playing for Man Shitty aged 40.
weird? I could've sworn I saw him playing for Man Shitty aged 40.
It is weird that a United fan seemingly needs a history lesson as to what happened to Peter Schmeichel, but there you are.
Hence the quotation marks.
If you're gonna make sweeping statements like "he retired from English football" then be sure to get it right.
The Dane retired from Manchester United, NOT English football.
He did retire from English football and you don't know what a sweeping statement is.
I've a huge problem with the whole retrospective dismissal of everyone's opinions.
If we took the opinions of people in this thread as they were at the time when we signed a number of players over the last ten years, there isn't one of us who wouldn't be embarrassed.
A sweeping statement is a statement that makes a wide-ranging and complete comment about something, or more often, everything.