Again, all indications are that he will not be on massive wages. Definitely not Sanchez or Falcao level. And it is a 1 year deal with an option for 1 more year. I understand the wariness, but it seems like the risk is already mitigated.
With both Sancho and Dembele falling through, that means Greenwood stays on the right wing. And with Ighalo leaving in Jan, that leaves us with only Martial as the dedicated striker. Cavani meets a short term need that we have. And he seems like he will be an upgrade on Ighalo. So, for now, we can only hope for the best.
Sure, and those arguments are all fine (if indeed it turns out to be the case), but - again - it's not about Cavani in isolation, it's people responding to a pattern of deal that we've seen the club make and get very little out of.
When you add to that to your second sentence and the general frustration that we're, probably, going to be starting the season with our best 11 being identical to last season you can understand why people are feeling deflated by the deal.
From my personal point of view, although I hope the deal will be a success, I think it's an example of the sort of transfer that the club has tried to pretend they wouldn't make under Ole and (along with the shambolic window generally) paints a picture of a club that just does not learn its lessons. If, at least, it's a substantial less risky proposition than Sanchez then it's one thing, but I'm not going to pretend I have any enthusiasm for a 33 year old Cavani in a United shirt (although I will fully admit I did not particularly rate him in his prime).
All the stuff about wages is being overstated big time when we have zero clue on any real figures and the ones being floated around amount to a steep pay cut from his last club.
It doesn't compare to Sanchez who was made the highest paid player in the league instantly and was brought in to be a main man, this isn't that.
Falcao on the other hand was a low risk transfer but he was coming off a career threatening injury. Cavani isn't being brought in to be our main man nor is he coming off catastrophic injury, a 1+1 year deal to provide a better alternative option in attack is a low risk proposition for the club.
If it doesnt work out we can cut ties after a year, if it works out and he scores some goals for us, great. It's not nearly as doom and gloom a signing as the hysterics and incessant moans are painting it out to be
You can critique the merits of the transfer on its own but that's not what people have been doing, they're projecting all of their frustration over this window and our management onto this along with their worst assumptions when nothing has even been finalized yet.
Of course, I wouldn't argue otherwise, but we also signed Ighalo as a stop gap signing to find someone else and are finding ourselves in the same position again. At a certain point it would be nice to actually make that signing and not just be stuck in a perpetual holding pattern of 'maybe next year me might get serious'.
As I've said though, rationally, there are arguments in favour of the deal, and for thinking it's better than Sanchez and Falcao, but it is awfully reminiscent of both of those deals and the club has absolutely zero credit in the back with anyone. People can be forgiven for thinking the worst.