Sanchez was incredible value for money in this market without doubt. On your point about goals and assists, Sanchez has the better output, but Hazard's dribbling ability is another level. Hazard's pace along with his close control is among the best in the world. Great player and naturally will cost an incredible sum in this market.
2 years younger than Alexis?
Not happening. Guardiola literally just said this:
Ouch.
Interesting, should mean they can't get Griezmann nevermind Dybala.
Interesting, should mean they can't get Griezmann nevermind Dybala.
I don't quite get it. They can buy a few 50mil defenders but can't make a one off purchase of £100mil + ?
It's not Hazard's dribbling in isolation that makes him a great player. He's a very complete player and is a consistent threat against any opposition. Hazard is a player that can make something out of nothing and hence is less reliant on the service of his team mates. Sanchez is a player that has a greater need of quality players around him to succeed.I couldn't really care about dribbling, I want United players to score and assist more than the opponent/rival. Sanchez dribbling abilty is more than enough.
Seems like complete meltdown when the manager is more or less telling everyone that it's an unmanageable club. What must the vibes in the dressing room be like?What's going on at Chelsea? There seems to be unrest and everyone seems to be wanting to leave. With us already having acquired Sanchez, 150m for Hazard seems unnecessary. I rather spend that kind of money on buying top notch midfielder and RW.
Huh, it's the other way around for me. Sanchez is more likely to take a game by the scruff of its neck and pull something out of the bag. Hazard favours interplay with teammates, so I'd say he's the one that needs better players around him. Not to say he can't do things alone, but one of his stronger assets after his dribbling is the way he combines with others. He's definitely less individualistic than Sanchez.It's not Hazard's dribbling in isolation that makes him a great player. He's a very complete player and is a consistent threat against any opposition. Hazard is a player that can make something out of nothing and hence is less reliant on the service of his team mates. Sanchez is a player that has a greater need of quality players around him to succeed.
It's not Hazard's dribbling in isolation that makes him a great player. He's a very complete player and is a consistent threat against any opposition. Hazard is a player that can make something out of nothing and hence is less reliant on the service of his team mates. Sanchez is a player that has a greater need of quality players around him to succeed.
Huh, it's the other way around for me. Sanchez is more likely to take a game by the scruff of its neck and pull something out of the bag. Hazard favours interplay with teammates, so I'd say he's the one that needs better players around him. Not to say he can't do things alone, but one of his stronger assets after his dribbling is the way he combines with others. He's definitely less individualistic than Sanchez.
I understand your points. I should have specified that when I said Hazard is more likely than Sanchez to create something out of nothing, I was referring primarily to when they both play on the left. For me, Sanchez is much better when he plays centrally, as he gets more involved in the game. When he plays out wide, he doesn't dribble past full backs and create as much, as opposed to Hazard who has among the highest successful dribble percentage in all of Europe playing there and hence why I said what I did about Hazard in my previous post.I disagree.
Hazard performed well in a team that won the PL twice, with good players around him. Hazard drifts in and out of form depending on his mood. He said something along the lines that he could score more goals or be the best player in the world if he wanted to - to me that shows that he doesn't fully apply himself.
His goal stats are also padded with penalties
Sanchez performed better in an average/struggling Arsenal side. I feel Sanchez applies himself alot more and is a hungry player not holding anything back. He certainly has the ability to win games by himself.
Anyway to stick with the original point, Sanchez is far far better value.
I mean, it's not like City shouldn't or won't try, but they pulled out of the sanchez deal because they could not compete with United's when it came to wages...how many chances would they have against real madrid?
Hazard better value than Sanchez?
Sanchez scores more goals, assists more goals, and would cost around £150m less.
How is that better value?
Sam Lee saying there's legs in this story linking him with City.
City think every player is queuing up for them because they want to Play for Pep™. They will find out they cannot get everyone. Hazard has a connect with the Chelsea fanbase, I doubt he would move to a rival in the league. Madrid, yes. Definitely don't see him at City.
Besides, Chelsea are our feeder club anyway.
Hazard doesn't care about Chelsea, he's been talking about leaving and using them as a stepping stone ever since the start. If chelsea don't give him massive wages he will be off this summer IMO. Madrid will be after him big time.City think every player is queuing up for them because they want to Play for Pep™. They will find out they cannot get everyone. Hazard has a connect with the Chelsea fanbase, I doubt he would move to a rival in the league. Madrid, yes. Definitely don't see him at City.
Besides, Chelsea are our feeder club anyway.
Seems like it. People are speaking as though he has a year left when he in fact has two.Seems like I'm in the minority in thinking he'll stay at Chelsea?