We should have got him when he was young. He's old already and I doubt we will get more than 3 years from him especially at that price. I'd rather Perisic.
Perisic is older than him ffs
And nowhere near as good. What are you smoking?
We should have got him when he was young. He's old already and I doubt we will get more than 3 years from him especially at that price. I'd rather Perisic.
Left on the bench today and didn't even get subbed on. Is he injured? If not it looks increasingly like the rumours he wants to leave are true.
The transfer forum isn't just for transfers to us.This shouldn't be in a transfer forum as we've absolutely have not a hope in hell of getting him.
He's off to Madrid or PSG.
The transfer forum isn't just for transfers to us.
Perhaps just Conte managing his minutes? He started two games in a row earlier this week, and today's game was decided after 25 minutes.Left on the bench today and didn't even get subbed on. Is he injured? If not it looks increasingly like the rumours he wants to leave are true.
We have arsenal in 4 days, he's being rested for that.
Left on the bench today and didn't even get subbed on. Is he injured? If not it looks increasingly like the rumours he wants to leave are true.
What? How have you worked this one out?
He was rested for Arsenal. And why would you sub him on when it was 3-0 after 20 minutes? What’s the point?
He may still leave though.
His father came right out and said he's waiting for us before signing anything with you...He may. I think he will sign a new deal before the summer, probably just wants a better offer and to be convinced the club are going to show ambition in January/summer window.
his father was chatting rubbish though it looks like. Rejected a contract offer his dad said, an offer which wasnt even made.His father came right out and said he's waiting for us before signing anything with you...
I think this ends with him becoming Chelsea's highest paid player ever.
Hazard better value than Sanchez?
Sanchez scores more goals, assists more goals, and would cost around £150m less.
How is that better value?
"There are salaries we cannot pay. There are parts of the transfer we cannot pay," said Guardiola.
"Maybe in the future it is going to happen, but we have not paid more than £100m for a player, or £90 or £80m. We cannot pay that right now. They told me. And the salaries and some things. We cannot pay. That is the truth."
How is that better value?
How is that better value?
Sanchez was incredible value for money in this market without doubt. On your point about goals and assists, Sanchez has the better output, but Hazard's dribbling ability is another level. Hazard's pace along with his close control is among the best in the world. Great player and naturally will cost an incredible sum in this market.Hazard better value than Sanchez?
Sanchez scores more goals, assists more goals, and would cost around £150m less.
How is that better value?
Sounds like his agent is already working on moving him to RM... but for the right money.
I don't believe City could land him. Why Hazard would want to join City? That's not an upgrade but a sideways move.
As if Chelsea would sell their best player to a direct rival, they'll sell players they don't think they need a la Matic but there's no way on this earth any team would sell their best player about to hit their prime to City.
I thought it was?? No? Okay then.
When they deemed him surplus (which Hazard never will be), he was nothing more than a bench player that season.They literally sold us their player of the season (Mata) for the last two years running. If the players don’t want to stay Abramovich will let them go, usually to where they please.