Blood Mage
2+2=united are rubbish
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2019
- Messages
- 8,311
He did a Rooney, failed to look after his body and suffered an early decline. Unbelievable player at his peak though, a top 10 dribbler of all time.
I'd say Bale's 12/13 was better than any season Hazard had. He was brilliant that season, looked like he was stepping up to near Ronaldo levels. Probably not quite one of the top 5 individual seasons in PL history but wouldn't be far off it.Don’t forget he was basically a one man team for us at times and was nigh unplayable at his best. Bale on the other hand scores a few Worldies and goes there for £80 mil which was massively overpriced at the time compared to average market value. Though I concede ended up being the better value.
I wouldn't agree with that. Well, if you're taking into account the amount of time left on the contracts then maybe (Hazard only having one year), but in terms of the player themselves definitely not.Maybe, but never at that price, it was more of a ripoff than Coutinho, anybody sane could have seen that.
Are you sure? By this logic you can say that average midfielders like Herrera also kept peak Hazard quiet.Wrong on so many levels. Peak Hazard was unstoppable whereas young kids like McNair were able to keep Sanchez quiet.
Yep, quite sureAre you sure? By this logic you can say that average midfielders like Herrera also kept peak Hazard quiet.
So where was this unstoppable Hazard in the champions league for chelsea at his peak? Why was he so bang average individually all those years for them? Would be a good reminder if you could name some of the unstoppable performances from peak Hazard in the champions league.Yep, quite sure
Hazard was an utterly brilliant player at his peak, surely this isn't even a discussion...So where was this unstoppable Hazard in the champions league for chelsea at his peak? Why was he so bang average individually all those years for them?
First, Whilst I kinda agree with your general point but that’s not entirely true. He was absolutely anonymous for Chelsea in the champions league. That’s not an utterly brilliant player. Could be brilliant on his day but not a world class player who only performs in patches.Hazard was an utterly brilliant player at his peak, surely this isn't even a discussion...
In the end he's still retiring with a CL and 2 Ligas in his trophy cabinet to add to his 2 PL titles and his Ligue 1/EL titles.
I think it was just a bit of an exaggeration for emphasis. I presume he didn't mean it literally. No player on earth is or was unstoppable.First, Whilst I kinda agree with your general point but that’s not entirely true. He was absolutely anonymous for Chelsea in the champions league. That’s not an utterly brilliant player. Could be brilliant on his day but not a world class player who only performs in patches.
Second, the poster I quoted said Sanchez was kept quiet by players like McNair whilst Hazard was unstoppable as if nobody was able to stop him. Utterly stupid point. Herrera also kept Hazard quiet too. And he failed to deliver in the champions league year in year out. Look at his performances in the champions league. It’s pathetic. Unstoppable my arse.
Let’s agree to disagree then. What I see is one amazing season, 2 great seasons and an ok season. 4 seasons isn’t enough to be considered PL tier 1 in my opinion. Team honours don’t particularly count towards individual success and you’re using his total season stats to justify his place in this theoretical league tier system. While his stats for his final 4 seasons are still impressive he only passed 20 goals in one season. In his first 3 seasons he was outshone by Robben who got a move to Madrid earlier because of it. Again, phenomenal at his peak but his peak was not United.
However Ronaldo is the last player from the PL to win the Balon D’or so there Is that Michael Owen won it too but most people would put him Tier 2 or Tier 3, tricky but in terms of player that could win you a champions league Ronaldo was that man he played in 2 CL finals with united wining one.
Absolutely. There was a post about peak Sanchez or peak Hazard, I would take Hazard 11 times out of 10. I watched both against us numerous times and we were able to deal with Sanchez far easily compared to Hazard except for one game where Herrera man marked him out of the game. But yeah, that happened once so he must be 'bang average'.I think it was just a bit of an exaggeration for emphasis. I presume he didn't mean it literally. No player on earth is or was unstoppable.
On his day, Hazard was up with the very best imo.
What are you really trying to argue? If you are saying that he wasn't world class then lets end the argument here.So where was this unstoppable Hazard in the champions league for chelsea at his peak? Why was he so bang average individually all those years for them? Would be a good reminder if you could name some of the unstoppable performances from peak Hazard in the champions league.
Tbh I don't remember Chelsea in the cl well enough to be able to pick out standout Hazard games but I think the champion's league thing is a bit of a red herring from that poster that they feel they can use as a 'gotcha' as to why Hazard wasn't world class. The CL is one of the highest standards, sure, but it's also a reasonably small sample size when set against hazard's PL performances. Also, there's a fecking reason Madrid paid so much for him...because he was a brilliant player. Never showed it for them, sure, but recency bias is clouding some judgments hereWhat are you really trying to argue? If you are saying that he wasn't world class then lets end the argument here.
He joined in 2019 and in his first match, which was a pre season game with Atletico, we lost 5-0 and he was the worst player on the pitch.
He arrived for a record fee at his dream club to be coached by his favorite childhood player overweight.
Simply the worst transfer in RM history.
You literally only get 6 games minimum a season to show yourself in the CL. Average for a club like Chelsea is 8-10. How anyone can judge a player based on the champions league alone is ludicrous. It’s the same poor argument Messi had about (previously) not winning anything for Argentina. A 38 game season is and always will be the best metric for judging a player because the sample size is more appropriate.Tbh I don't remember Chelsea in the cl well enough to be able to pick out standout Hazard games but I think the champion's league thing is a bit of a red herring from that poster that they feel they can use as a 'gotcha' as to why Hazard wasn't world class. The CL is one of the highest standards, sure, but it's also a reasonably small sample size when set against hazard's PL performances. Also, there's a fecking reason Madrid paid so much for him...because he was a brilliant player. Never showed it for them, sure, but recency bias is clouding some judgments here
CL is about rising up to the occasion and showing up in big games.You literally only get 6 games minimum a season to show yourself in the CL. Average for a club like Chelsea is 8-10. How anyone can judge a player based on the champions league alone is ludicrous. It’s the same poor argument Messi had about (previously) not winning anything for Argentina. A 38 game season is and always will be the best metric for judging a player because the sample size is more appropriate.
Hazard's CL performances were the only underwhelming part of his time here. Not that he was bad but nowhere near as good as his league performances. Probably best to note that we changed managers pretty much every 2 years when he was here, and for the most part played under negative, sit back and counter coaches. The players that you think of that stood out in the CL (Lewa/Neymar/Bale/Suarez etc) all played for very dominant attack-oriented sides. I would say Hazard was arguably the best player in the PL of his era along with the likes of D.Silva, Aguero and a few others. But then the question remains, what did Silva and Aguero do in Europe? Even less than Hazard but you don't hear a thing.
This was the worst thing about it. He did the same thing every pre-season with us. But when he left I figured this was his big opportunity at his dream club, and he would actually act professional..
Yes his UCL performances weren't great which is why I'd put him slightly behind the A list when factoring the overall picture but in the league he carried us in the business end twice when most of the rest of the team were shitting themselves, especially I'm 2015. The narrative that he blew hot and cold or took every other season off is utter nonsense.CL is about rising up to the occasion and showing up in big games.
Based on your logic here the World Cup is not a good metric either to judge anyone either, actually it's even worse than the CL considering it's 7 games maximum instead of 13 and only once every four years.
Agree with this too. Hazard has always been overrated one of those who disappeared at top European game. His CL record is a disgrace. Like 5 non PK goalsHe was always overrated to be honest. This stint has done absolutely nothing to prove that wrong either. Much preferred peak Alexis Sanchez, he had the attitude to match his talent unlike Hazard.
He was a moment's player.
If he's one of the all time PL greats then Salah must be the best because he could do everything Hazard did and more.
Yeh I would agree with that. Hazard was unplayable on his day but I still think he was overrated primarily because of how ‘pretty’ he was to watch. He would glide past players through dribbling but he always had a tendency to beat a player, stop and beat them again when it would have been more effective to go for the jugular. His comments on scoring goals also left a sour taste in my mouth, a played with his ability should have been looking to kill and destroy teams, instead he was content with just beating people for fun.I think Salah is in the Ronaldo Henry Shearer Vidic level that is the very elite.
Hazard was surely below that,
I would not even put Hazard in the the 2nd tier which includes Cantona Suarez Aguero RVP KdB Terry Lampard Rio
Hazard might be tier 3 realistically which is not a bad place cos you will have players like Drogba Kante Bergkamp Beckham etc
Yeh I would agree with that. Hazard was unplayable on his day but I still think he was overrated primarily because of how ‘pretty’ he was to watch. He would glide past players through dribbling but he always had a tendency to beat a player, stop and beat them again when it would have been more effective to go for the jugular. His comments on scoring goals also left a sour taste in my mouth, a played with his ability should have been looking to kill and destroy teams, instead he was content with just beating people for fun.
In the Premier league alone, Henry would top most people's lists. Ronaldo's most productive seasons came at Madrid.I think he was the second or third best player I've seen in the EPL. Shame how the Madrid move turned out for him. My list would probably go like:
1. CR7
2. Henry
3. Hazard
4. KDB
5. Suarez
6. Salah
7. Aguero
8. Rooney
9. David Silva
10. VVD
4 - 10 are relatively interchangeable I think.
Hazard wasn't the brain dead footballer that Ronaldo was in his first 3 seasons. He simply lacked the individualism and professionalism of Ronaldo of later years.True. You get that impression that Hazards primary intention was to dribble and embarass the marker possibly multiple times in a move not to get past him marker. Like how a younger CR7 will dribble Ashley Cole and wait for him to get up and repeat that dribble again. Those moves that make you look good and clever at a pickup game
Most footballers who learn football on the streets will have that skill until they get polished at academies
How does termination actually work? Romano claimed they've saved loads? So he's casually agreed to be paid out early, for potentially retirement? Essentially, what Bale refused to do... or they've just paid out his final year in full?
Or is it just one of those mysteries.