Man-United
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2003
- Messages
- 16,304
Woodward can't get much right.
Unfortunately unless the club starts making big losses and the Glazers end up selling it, I don't see any way we can get rid of Woodward and things will more than likely remain the same.Been saying this the last few years, thread I made last summer on Ed got closed. But he has 0 nuance on how to get us to be a top club again, he's content with us being 'thereabouts' but that's not good enough. Under Ed I genuinely don't see a title challenge in the next 5 years, which is shocking because it's been 7 years since we last challenged. This is essentially how Liverpool became Liverpool in the league.
Unfortunately unless the club starts making big losses and the Glazers end up selling it, I don't see any way we can get rid of Woodward and things will more than likely remain the same.
Woodward is just an extension of the Glazers. Getting rid of one without the other still means the foundations are rotting with infestation.
Yeah they've taken something like $1b out of the club over the last 15 years through debt payments and dividends, which is shocking in an time where oil clubs have been spending huge amounts.
The borrowings of the 20-times champions remain at £487m despite the American family having purchased United in 2005 for a debt of £525m. This means that less than £3m a year has been paid off since, with the cost of serving the debt amounting to £24m a year.
Been saying this the last few years, thread I made last summer on Ed got closed. But he has 0 nuance on how to get us to be a top club again, he's content with us being 'thereabouts' but that's not good enough. Under Ed I genuinely don't see a title challenge in the next 5 years, which is shocking because it's been 7 years since we last challenged. This is essentially how Liverpool became Liverpool in the league.
Spot on. Woodward going wouldnt make a jot of difference. We need owners with a plan and desire to compete for the top prizesWoodward is just an extension of the Glazers. Getting rid of one without the other still means the foundations are rotting with infestation.
I think it was Ogden who said this on twitter but when you look at how Ajax & United have progressed post Europa League final and the amount of money spent by both clubs, it really makes you wonder how Ed is not under more pressure internally.
Our owners don’t care about us winning major trophies, being an amazing footballing side and exciting the fans (hallmarks of United signs pre Glazers).
All they care about is cold hard cash.
All you need to know to understand the situation we’re in
They bought the club to maximize commercial revenue. They saw an opportunity to do that and have done it well. There was no plan for what would happen post-Fergie but by them, the revenue streams were established so it didn't really matter.
Woodward is just an extension of the Glazers. Getting rid of one without the other still means the foundations are rotting with infestation.
This will be the new expensive arsenal if he is in charge any longer.
At this stage, there does not look like much room for significant growth.
Match day revenue has plateaued out for a few years.
The recent TV deal saw no growth whatsoever.
Commercial has matured. Maybe add another rice partner here and there.
Time to sell please.
If Woody's performance was being judged on how successful the club has been, he'd have been long gone.
So what's his performance being judged on?
Profits and revenue
If Woody's performance was being judged on how successful the club has been, he'd have been long gone.
So what's his performance being judged on?
At this stage, there does not look like much room for significant growth.
Match day revenue has plateaued out for a few years.
The recent TV deal saw no growth whatsoever.
Commercial has matured. Maybe add another rice partner here and there.
Time to sell please.
Brace yourself a Woodward transfer briefing will surely be coming soon now . He always has one ready after a big defeat to confuse the fan base .