Crustanoid
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2008
- Messages
- 18,511
Ok sorry Ed.No need to be rude, you're the one posting nonsense and making it look like a fact. Nobody here likes him, but giving false information is just silly and not necessary.
Ok sorry Ed.No need to be rude, you're the one posting nonsense and making it look like a fact. Nobody here likes him, but giving false information is just silly and not necessary.
Ok sorry Ed.
No worries, simpleton
When is he going to officially step down? And will he still hold a position at the club? His fourth failed managerial appointment there for all to see, and so so so so much money wasted along the way.
It's supposed to be at the end of the year but there's been talk recently that he could stay on until the end of the season.When is he going to officially step down? And will he still hold a position at the club? His fourth failed managerial appointment there for all to see, and so so so so much money wasted along the way.
Todays performance probably embarassed him into going early; Ive no time for the guy but if thats the case I couldnt blame him!From what I've read, Woodward wanted to step down at the end of the season but the Glazers convinced him to stay on until the end of the year which was the original plan. It's looking like Richard Arnold will replace him.
It's supposed to be at the end of the year but there's been talk recently that he could stay on until the end of the season.
This. Although he could’ve done it about 7 years ago. But yeah, carbon copy of Ed.Woodward departing makes no difference, since his replacement, Richard Arnold, is even worse. Our horrible owners are the problem
Is it still Ed Woodward's decision to sack Solskjaer, or will it be a group call between Woodward, Arnold and Murtough? Could it be Murtough and Fletcher the part time coach fighting Solskjaer's corner?
I hope the press start narrowing in on the owners with the adequate ridicule.
Why the feck is he still here?
Honestly this nonsense needs to stop.At the end of the day Ed showed more dignity resigning than Solsjkaer, who is clinging to his job fir his dear life.
Honestly this nonsense needs to stop.
It’s up to the club to tell Solskjaer when to leave. Solskjaer is not going to turn down his compensation money and there isn’t a single poster on here that would in his position either.
Ed is the one who put Solksjaer there in the first place. Ole didn't hire himself.At the end of the day Ed showed more dignity resigning than Solsjkaer, who is clinging to his job for his dear life.
At the end of the day Ed showed more dignity resigning than Solsjkaer, who is clinging to his job for his dear life.
I liked the part where he tried to kidnap the club into the superleague then had his PR machine tell us he knew nothing about it. Absolute diamond of a manAt the end of the day Ed showed more dignity resigning than Solsjkaer, who is clinging to his job for his dear life.
He was supposed to be gone in the summer but he's still here. Dignity.
Like Solskjaer, he's a yes man. My point is there is no difference between those two. They are driven by their own interests.I liked the part where he tried to kidnap the club into the superleague then had his PR machine tell us he knew nothing about it. Absolute diamond of a man
At the end of the day Ed showed more dignity resigning than Solsjkaer, who is clinging to his job for his dear life.
As I said - it was in jest. Ole has been the longest serving manager post Fergie and he's responsible for most of these shite you are talking about - spending half a billion, without something to show for. And that for being the third best paid manager in the league. Coaching staff is nepotism at its best and needs a huge rebuild. Broken all sorts of negative records.Mad take. There are no redeeming features in Woodward's tenure. He has done a terrible job throughout and he, along with the Glazer scum, is responsible for all of the shite we've been through, and for fleecing the club. The man is a grade a c unt and incompetent at his job.
Ole is clueless, but he's not some Glazer subhuman.
As I said - it was in jest. Ole has been the longest serving manager post Fergie and he's responsible for most of these shite you are talking about - spending half a billion, without something to show for. And that for being the third best paid manager in the league. Coaching staff is nepotism at its best and needs a huge rebuild. Broken all sorts of negative records.
I hope the press start narrowing in on the owners with the adequate ridicule.
I don't understand that tweet. Can someone explain?
Yeah, I've seen it. Bizarre.I think it's dawning on Neville that he's in the minority of one, and that's as close as he's come to acknowledge there's a managerial issue, albeit by focusing on Woodward who, in his view, is in a lose lose situation.
Yesterday though when Neville was called out for his crap about United having gone down the route of world class managers and it not working (like exhaustive empirical evidence) when it was put to him that neither van Gaal nor Mourinho were at their best when hired, Neville responded with "who do you hire". He's stuck in logical no man´s land.
The huge issue is for me nepotism at the club - appointing figures that are related to United rather on their professional acumen and actual qualities for the job. It's from top to bottom - Woodward to begin with - a yes man, Ole, coaching stuff, technical directors and all.Ha. Fair enough. Ole has been, on the whole, pretty terrible. If you look at the money spent and how expectations have been lowered embarrassingly. But it's on Woodward and his cohorts spending too much on players, both in fees and wages. All of that could have been avoided at any stage post SAF by entrusting a DoF to oversee footballing matters.
I am just hoping for the popularisation of the narrative that United are a directionless club that desperately needs to entrust footballing people (with pedigree) for footballing matters. Including the next managerial hire.
Yeah, I've seen it. Bizarre.
But my question was to the substance of the tweet. So Woodward is leaving soon, and he doesn't want his last act to be sacking Ole. So far, fair enough. The manager's position is of too much importance to be a lame duck executive decision.
But then that's where I'm lost.
As far as I know, the new, incoming sporting executive is not an unknown, or outsider, is he? It's Arnold, no? Woodward's current right hand man? So why wouldn't they be able to coordinate between them?
Yeah, I've seen it. Bizarre.
But my question was to the substance of the tweet. So Woodward is leaving soon, and he doesn't want his last act to be sacking Ole. So far, fair enough. The manager's position is of too much importance to be a lame duck executive decision.
But then that's where I'm lost.
As far as I know, the new, incoming sporting executive is not an unknown, or outsider, is he? It's Arnold, no? Woodward's current right hand man? So why wouldn't they be able to coordinate between them?
The huge issue is for me nepotism at the club - appointing figures that are related to United rather on their professional acumen and actual qualities for the job. It's from top to bottom - Woodward to begin with - a yes man, Ole, coaching stuff, technical directors and all.
It's basically an outdated structure that needs a deep cleansing. We need fresh approach and even appoint some continental figures to bring us new direction and instill some kind of structure and philosophy. Otherwise we just change personnel doing nothing.
That and giving no time for mediocre figures to waste the time like Ole and Woodward. As soon as its clear they are not up for the job they should be axed on the spot. For Woodward that time was in Moyes first season at the job and for Ole basically after he was appointed as perm.