Johan07
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2017
- Messages
- 1,936
I would rather off myself than go into a season when a football has not been even kicked yet thinking we will finish below any of those two trash outfits.
I would rather off myself than go into a season when a football has not been even kicked yet thinking we will finish below any of those two trash outfits.
I agree he will never get demoted and Glazers will never sell up.
But I do agree that that OT with fans ripping him is the best way to put pressure on Woodward. This time if the team fails, the fans will not be calling for the manager's head. Ole has alot more credibility with the fans than Ed Woodward ever will. It was in his own interest to give Ole 4/5 new players. He has failed to deliver in my opinion. He might have made a few signings, but he has done feck all to get rid of anyone.
Looking like there's not gonna be any more moves for us, no mad dash before the window closes. We still really need a midfielder but, hey ho, looks like we're getting more Matic and Mata.
Oh get the feck off. What are you on about. Here's a Caf thread on the subject - https://www.redcafe.net/threads/solskjaer-target-5-signings-6-players-could-leave-bbc-telegraph-guardian.446294.What story? Which football club on the planet briefs the press on the exact number of signings that they will make during the a summer window? What would even be the purpose of it? It defies logic. You just made that up, and its far too much of that crap going on in threads like this.
Solskjaer wants as many as five new signings, with a right-back, centre-half and versatile forward in his sights and, depending on the futures of Ander Herrera and Juan Mata, one or two midfielders.
The club’s broad policy each summer window is to sign three players and allow three to leave, but given the higher number who may depart this year more than three could be incoming.
Look at what Arsenal are doing when they appointed a new technical director. Even with limited funds they're still attaining solid players that will improve them.
Woodward needs to feck right off from footballing decisions. All that gossip about getting a new technical director and feck all was done about it. I really hope our fans don't ease off him because he got us a few good signings this summer, he's still an incompetent worm that loves giving deadwood new contracts.
Woodward does not do briefings. If anything I would like him to be more open towards the fans than he is now. The Varane thing is an urban legend/myth that is just not true. But now when its taken root it will just not go away.
No but PSG wanted to sell him to us."Vetoed on Neymar"
As if Neymar would ever join us
Oh get the feck off. What are you on about. Here's a Caf thread on the subject - https://www.redcafe.net/threads/solskjaer-target-5-signings-6-players-could-leave-bbc-telegraph-guardian.446294.
Here's Ducker's article posted on the 3rd of April on 10:30 PM - https://www.telegraph.co.uk/footbal...ed-huge-summer-overhaul-ole-gunnar-solskjaer/
Here's a quote from that article
Here's Guadian's article posted on the 3rd of April 10:29 PM - https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...hez-manchester-united-exodus-de-gea-solskjaer
Here's a quote from that article
And here's the BBC's article - https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/47805207; no prizes for guessing when it was posted.
Here a tweet from Simon Peach
Obviously nothing is clearly defined, I wouldn't expect it to be 2 months before the window opened, but the brief clearly existed and the message behind it clearly was "we are going to spend money on multiple players that can have immediate impact". You can twist and turn this every way you want but the reality is this brief happened and it was very very dumb. Thinking this brief is a good idea would make you look like a massive tit.
You know we have a PR-department right? Do you actually think that Woodward himself sits in his chambers and texts Neil fecking Custis? Grow up. All clubs brief the press one way or another. Is the CEO involved? Naw, just on the Caf.Woodward does not do briefings? Good one.
That was a clear briefing.
And a classic one by him, being in the air and reported in a space of a few minutes by pretty much everyone (Guardian, Times and other papers were running the same story). Same thing with pulling off from Griezmann, Eriksen deal and so many other attempts of him trying to look better in public or more competent... Which kind of CEO even does this kind of things? Keep it in the club/organisation and deal with it internally.
Feel free to ignore the reality though. Much better if you can. There are so many mistakes that this man has done that I fail to see how anyone can defend him or have any kind of confidence he will get things right at this point.
Was he serious when he said that?
If you go in to a season with the defaistic notion that we will finish below City and Pool then whats the purpose of even supporting a football club? Especially one like United. Wtf is happening with our fanbase?Was he serious when he said that?
You know we have a PR-department right? Do you actually think that Woodward himself sits in his chambers and texts Neil fecking Custis? Grow up. All clubs brief the press one way or another. Is the CEO involved? Naw, just on the Caf.
You know we have a PR-department right? Do you actually think that Woodward himself sits in his chambers and texts Neil fecking Custis? Grow up. All clubs brief the press one way or another. Is the CEO involved? Naw, just on the Caf.
Like your optimism but it's unfounded. To say we will catch them up after our transfer business so far is ludicrous. Let's say we sell Lukaku our net spend will be that of one player that Arsenal have signed. Matic is finished and we have not replaced Herrera, Fellaini. We are placing our trust in an unproven coach with a bunch of unproven kids and you expect us to make up 30+ points on two very good sides like City and Liverpool?If you go in to a season with the defaistic notion that we will finish below City and Pool then whats the purpose of even supporting a football club? Especially one like United. Wtf is happening with our fanbase?
Cool. Called me tit, accused me of making shit up and now you're playing the sanctimonious "I will respectfully disagree" card. Good on you. Stellar sequence of posts there mate.Look: the club´s policy since OGS took over has been pretty clear: To just go for players that will immediately improve the team; and if those are not available to give youth a chance or even buy youth prospescts like James. Both Wan-Bissaka and Maguire fit that bill. A player like Fernandes does not.
I dont dispute that its the signals our PR-department has been sending out; especially because it seems to be the truth. What you stated is that the press had been briefed (by Woodward) that we would sign 5 players this summer, when its pretty fecking obvious that all those stories are speculations by respective journo from what probably was a very general brief from the PR-department. If you want to take that as a promise from our CEO to sign 5 players. Fine, go ahead, and I will respectfully disagree and shake my head at the same time.
No, he is most likely not. Woodward is the CEO. The heads of financial, IT, PR, corporate development, youth setup, scouting, footballing, HR, IR and a lot more people report to him. Is he accountable for how the club is set up? Sure. Is he involved in the day-to-day business of negotiating contracts or briefing the press, or shit like that. He is not.And who the feck runs that PR-department and to whom does it responds? CEO isn't involved in that? The briefing about blocking Jose targets was done by Woodward himself btw.
He has been lucky he is at the head of Manchester United. Imagine him running some other not so profitable and lucrative club with this scattergun approach. You'll probably be on the back of Ole if things don't work out next season claiming that Ed delivered his targets. Enjoy your fantasy world.
No, he is most likely not. Woodward is the CEO. The heads of financial, IT, PR, corporate development, youth setup, scouting, footballing, HR, IR and a lot more people report to him. Is he accountable for how the club is set up? Sure. Is he involved in the day-to-day business of negotiating contracts or briefing the press, or shit like that. He is not.
This narrative of an omnipotent Woodward that controls everything at United is so weird; and yet its taken root with posters like you and other in this thread that you cant even see how its not even logical to begin with.
Hey, you started with the giant tit thing. Dont blame it on me if a tit should even be considered a bad thing.Cool. Called me tit, accused me of making shit up and now you're playing the sanctimonious "I will respectfully disagree" card. Good on you. Stellar sequence of posts there mate.
I don't really care it's just somewhat funny seeing you backtrack to "I will respectfully disagree" after being proven wrong.Hey, you started with the giant tit thing. Dont blame it on me if a tit should even be considered a bad thing.
No, he is most likely not. Woodward is the CEO. The heads of financial, IT, PR, corporate development, youth setup, scouting, footballing, HR, IR and a lot more people report to him. Is he accountable for how the club is set up? Sure. Is he involved in the day-to-day business of negotiating contracts or briefing the press, or shit like that. He is not.
I am not defending anyone. I could give less shit about Woodward to be honest. He never does interviews and when he does he sounds like Boris Johnson on weed. Its just clichees that does not mean anything except for ABU-media and some posters on here that try to interpret the shit out of nothing.I don't know why you're defending Woodward so hard, there's no secret plot against him as you're trying to make out. The media was briefed about Ed vetoing Jose's signings, presumably that briefing would've got the ok from Ed first otherwise whoever did it would get sacked.
Fact of the matter is in footballing signings terms the man holds the most power and is rightly singled out for our scattergun and unstructured approach over the last 6 years.
Yes. I support United. I am not fast-forwarding this season just for the sake of it. I would favor us for the CL as well if it was not for it being theoretically impossible.Like your optimism but it's unfounded. To say we will catch them up after our transfer business so far is ludicrous. Let's say we sell Lukaku our net spend will be that of one player that Arsenal have signed. Matic is finished and we have not replaced Herrera, Fellaini. We are placing our trust in an unproven coach with a bunch of unproven kids and you expect us to make up 30+ points on two very good sides like City and Liverpool?
Not everyone is sheep and blindly follows without asking question despite 6 years of a disastrous management.If you go in to a season with the defaistic notion that we will finish below City and Pool then whats the purpose of even supporting a football club? Especially one like United. Wtf is happening with our fanbase?
Not everyone is sheep and blindly follows without asking question despite 6 years of a disastrous management.
Yep, some are falling for the “we tried to sign X player but they just didn’t want to come” bollocks. I’m not having it, hope they prove me wrong.Woodward is taking United fans for fools.
Yeah, everyone to blame, but not him. Heard that one before.
Will there be the inevitable "Woodward gets fleeced on Deadline Day" buy?
The baffling thing is, some are believing that there aren't players out there who would improve on Matic or Lingard for example and are willing to come and play for Manchester United. It's bonkers.Yep, some are falling for the “we tried to sign X player but they just didn’t want to come” bollocks. I’m not having it, hope they prove me wrong.
Yep, some are falling for the “we tried to sign X player but they just didn’t want to come” bollocks. I’m not having it, hope they prove me wrong.