On the contrary, absolute rubbish post. Most people identify the problem as the owners, with slabface puppet running around trying to do their bidding. Making a list of managers and saying what you don't like about them, based on feck all is not analysis. This has been played to death. These longish posts defending or muddying the waters always show up, don't they? 'Ed has made mistakes...?' Oh, really?
I’m not defending the ownership, but Ed is an employee of the Glazers, so what do you expect? They’ll sack him and replace him with Gary Neville?
If you want the owners out, 2 things would need to happen:
1) A buyer would have to emerge that would convince the remaining Glazer family members with majority shares in the club to sell up and agree on a set price for a buyout.
2) This mysteriously benevolent owner would then (in an ideal world) get the banks to agree repaying the debt, cause the Glazers ain’t repaying that debt. Also easier said than done.
Then they’d structure the club after the takeover as some see fit.
Who is this mysterious owner? Because some the people that can afford such an endeavour are frightening prospective owners.
Alternatively the tin foil hat crowd can wrap themselves in delusions “based on feck all [that] is not analysis” that if you don’t buy a kit this year, don’t go the matches, and join Paul Ince in writing poorly constructed 4th level open letters to Ed that it will make a bit of difference.
Ed and the Glazers are in charge for the here and now. Any self-respecting United supporter, myself included, would wish for this mysterious benevolent owner to arrive, but until then there’s certainly room to hope that Ed has learned from mistakes and the club can kick on. What’s the alternative? Stew in anger and rage against the dying of the light? No thanks, but enjoy.
These shortish posts calling Ed names and muddying up the waters always show up, don’t they?