Film Dune

Resolved? A huge war was starting and the woman he would "love forever" had been rejected and was buggering of to do something or other. Seemed far from resolved to me. Both of us looked at each other a bit stunned at the end. "Was that it" was my wife's response. So little really happened in terms of plot and it took so long to get there. I didn't hate it at all but what a missed opportunity IMO.

Some of this is an issue with the source material, it's always been a bit anticlimactic because the Harkonnens get dispatched somewhat easily and then the Emperor is in and out of the picture quickly. This is probably magnified in this version since Feyd is not in the first movie. So basically he gets a long introduction, doesn't do much afterwards, and then dies.

The movie feels a bit more open because the whole 'Chani leaves' thing is a Villeneuve invention.
 
The movie feels a bit more open because the whole 'Chani leaves' thing is a Villeneuve invention.
I think that actually makes it work though. The movie ends with Paul gaining absolute power and setting in motion a freightful Fremen assault on the galaxy, while Chani leaves him. That's what he foresaw and what he tried to avoid by refusing to travel south. In that sense, it's a drama in which Paul fights the pressure of those around him that want him to become God Emperor of Dune because he knows it won't be pretty - but eventually succumbs and indeed loses himself in the process. That's a narrative arch that can satisfactorily end exactly where it does. (And in which the final battle is a trifling detail that can go only one way, and therefore cannot reasonably be stretched out into some epic cinematic happening.)

(Or do we still need spoilers here?)
 
I thought it resolved pretty well - Paul's journey through the 2 films seems to be basically what Anakin was supposed to do through the prequels, except that Paul's motivations and decisions make a lot more sense.

For the film itself, it was good but I preferred the first, remember it feeling more spectacular, but that could be because it was my first post-covid theater movie.
 
I thought it resolved pretty well - Paul's journey through the 2 films seems to be basically what Anakin was supposed to do through the prequels, except that Paul's motivations and decisions make a lot more sense.

For the film itself, I think I preferred the first, remember it feeling more spectacular, but that could be because it was my first post-covid theater movie.

Paul also doesn’t have a problem with sand.
 
Finally got around to watching the 2nd one. Think I maybe built it up too much in my head given how much I enjoyed the first as wasn’t blown away at the end. Good film but likely won’t be going back/rewatching whereas the first I did a few times.
 
I'm interested to see how this does. I know it had some issues in production and visually its seems to be very much influenced by the recent two films.
But does this element of the Dune world interest people ?
 
I'm interested to see how this does. I know it had some issues in production and visually its seems to be very much influenced by the recent two films.
But does this element of the Dune world interest people ?
A quick glance at the timelines suggests this is around the time of the end of the Butlerian Jihad and before the Guild system, so there's good scope for some machinations and intrigue. Depends on the writing is probably the copout answer, if they just go down the route of pointing at familiar names and shouting "like from Dune!" at the viewer then it won't be very good. Bit disappointing the design all looks so similar to a time 10,000 years hence.
 
Just got to watch the 2nd part on max, now i regret not seeing it in cinema, but guess i still have time.

What a fecking movie man, Paul is such a badass. Can't really tell if he will end up as a mad king though, but i guess he got it planned out being psychic and shit :lol:

Having to wait years for the 3rd is painful right now. Legendary.
 
Not made by Denis Villeneuve and based on the apparently (?) terrible books of the son, which automatically makes me a bit skeptical.
Just had a look at the character names and this looks pretty much like what they're doing so... :lol:
A quick glance at the timelines suggests this is around the time of the end of the Butlerian Jihad and before the Guild system, so there's good scope for some machinations and intrigue. Depends on the writing is probably the copout answer, if they just go down the route of pointing at familiar names and shouting "like from Dune!" at the viewer then it won't be very good. Bit disappointing the design all looks so similar to a time 10,000 years hence.
 
Not made by Denis Villeneuve and based on the apparently (?) terrible books of the son, which automatically makes me a bit skeptical.

While the son's books were indeed outrageously bad, the premise of seeing the formation of the Bene Gesserit is a very interesting one to most Dune fans.

Also, setting it this time means none of the really out there sci fi stuff like sandworms, facedancers or chairdogs.
 
Just got to watch the 2nd part on max, now i regret not seeing it in cinema, but guess i still have time.

What a fecking movie man, Paul is such a badass. Can't really tell if he will end up as a mad king though, but i guess he got it planned out being psychic and shit :lol:

Having to wait years for the 3rd is painful right now. Legendary.

I've seen it in iMAX, Dolby Atmos and on my home PC from a downloaded 1080p webrip. Honestly the webrip was the best viewing experience. Better picture and even clearer audio. iMAX seemed blurry half the time.
 
I've seen it in iMAX, Dolby Atmos and on my home PC from a downloaded 1080p webrip. Honestly the webrip was the best viewing experience. Better picture and even clearer audio. iMAX seemed blurry half the time.
I've preordered the 4k UHD disk. I'm thinking this will be the best. Excited to rewatch!
 
Is it in Travis Fimmel's contract that he must have a facial scar for every role he plays ?