Draft About Nothing

You just have to significantly lower your expectations. Or go to lesser researched countries/timelines in a hope for a half-arsed made wiki page.

I've lowered them a lot, but without picking my own sheep I can't find anything
 
I did actually find one, but they are born before the cut off date with no full game
 
That's a bit weird, but hey... would've picked another player, who is suddenly eligible :)
I scoured about 20-30 players, but only used the English page of course. Researching every international wiki page is very tedious as you can imagine...

Donadoni was my other option, along 1 not picked yet..
 
True. By the time it goes to me, I might have 5) JlingZ (JlingZ).
 
True. By the time it goes to me, I might have 5) JlingZ (JlingZ).

I wish you could pick still playing players, I found a pearler. I am still looking by the way so sorry about the delay
 
I wish you could pick still playing players, I found a pearler. I am still looking by the way so sorry about the delay

Take your time. I am sure no one above you has found a decent player either till now :lol:
 
And yet Enigma found himself a spare
There are couple.

Some played their trade during Catenaccio, who couldn't boost their numbers, there are some even modern ones, but won't be rated as highly I suppose.

And one that has been picked in drafts(rated well) but is a challenge to find a full game.

Also couple that played in South America.

This is from my 1-2 hrs research..
 
TediousJaggedBongo-size_restricted.gif


Lee Sheep...I mean Sharpe

and AM9
 
I just did as I was told.
You did nothing wrong — the rules are clear and you followed them to a letter. It's just that the point of the round is completely lost — there had to be some sort of a manual control over the picks that wouldn't have allowed the cases of a ridiculous oversight from an English wiki (compared to slight discrepancies between the wiki pages that should've been allowed).
 
You did nothing wrong — the rules are clear and you followed them to a letter. It's just that the point of the round is completely lost — there had to be some sort of a manual control over the picks that wouldn't have allowed the cases of a ridiculous oversight from an English wiki (compared to slight discrepancies between the wiki pages that should've been allowed).
True but going by the rounds so far it isn't a serious draft so thought that technicality was a part of all that.
 
It should be an attacking player right?

It can be a winger. Although Di Livio is almost too defensive to fit even in that category.

I was told if I picked someone that dropped back later in their career I'd have to play them in their attacking position
 
I'll pick #PP by the way completely forgot as always. For whoever eventually updates the list