Kostur
海尔的老板
Who has actually said we shouldn't spend more than 25m on him?
Voices in his head.
Who has actually said we shouldn't spend more than 25m on him?
Caf be like
DDG - 100m no less.
Costa - no more than 25m
I'd be interested. People have cited that his end product isn't good enough, and if you're talking about goals that's true, but his delivery into the box is better than any player we currently have, and we've been severely lacking good delivery in recent years.
Really? I certainly didn't. I pointed specifically to Mikhi's end product (he had insane numbers for goals and assists in 2015/16) as the main reason we should sign him. Never saw him as a conventional winger; he's an attacking midfielder who can play on either flank. I think most people just started calling him a RW because that was the obvious spot in our squad where we needed someone new.I am sure people also said the same thing about Mkhy last season.
He's an extremely onedimensional player who was able to shine for a while because Pep set us up in a way that compensated for his weaknesses. He was mostly isolated on the left wing, able to pick on single defenders with his pace and dribbling and then he would bring an extremely hard, flat cross into the back of the defense. That was basically all he ever did.I haven't watch him this season but looking at stats he's been poor in his end product. What happened to him? Can any Bundesliga or Bayern fans let us know?
Personally I would like us to sign him since he's a natural winger and we don't have a natural winger anymore (except Young) but at the same time since our main problem is our end product which makes me doubt if he can solve our problem since his end product this season has been very poor.
Really? I certainly didn't. I pointed specifically to Mikhi's end product (he had insane numbers for goals and assists in 2015/16) as the main reason we should sign him. Never saw him as a conventional winger; he's an attacking midfielder who can play on either flank. I think most people just started calling him a RW because that was the obvious spot in our squad where we needed someone new.
He's an extremely onedimensional player who was able to shine for a while because Pep set us up in a way that compensated for his weaknesses. He was mostly isolated on the left wing, able to pick on single defenders with his pace and dribbling and then he would bring an extremely hard, flat cross into the back of the defense. That was basically all he ever did.
It worked because we had Lewandowski and Müller as the scorers. That season, we played almost always through the wings to get the ball to our two forwards.
If you are able to set him up like this, he's great. Otherwise he's bang average. Pacy, great shot, good dribbling. That's all there is to him. His crossing isn't even that good, to be honest. He just would cross all the time. Some of those had to lead to goals.
Costa under Pep is the definition of a system player. I highly doubt he will thrive nearly as much in other teams. The only other way he could be utilized effectively for me would be as a left midfielder in front of a back three. Like Cuadrado did at Juve.
If you are able to give him space and an opportunity to cross a lot, go for it. But don't expect wonders.
He's an extremely onedimensional player who was able to shine for a while because Pep set us up in a way that compensated for his weaknesses. He was mostly isolated on the left wing, able to pick on single defenders with his pace and dribbling and then he would bring an extremely hard, flat cross into the back of the defense. That was basically all he ever did.
It worked because we had Lewandowski and Müller as the scorers. That season, we played almost always through the wings to get the ball to our two forwards.
If you are able to set him up like this, he's great. Otherwise he's bang average. Pacy, great shot, good dribbling. That's all there is to him. His crossing isn't even that good, to be honest. He just would cross all the time. Some of those had to lead to goals.
Costa under Pep is the definition of a system player. I highly doubt he will thrive nearly as much in other teams. The only other way he could be utilized effectively for me would be as a left midfielder in front of a back three. Like Cuadrado did at Juve.
If you are able to give him space and an opportunity to cross a lot, go for it. But don't expect wonders.
You can't honestly think that assists = good delivery into the box from wide positions...You pretty much just did. By calling it as insane numbers of assists is the same thing with calling his deliver into the box was better than any players what we had in 2015/2016.
I didn't say he plays like Nani. I said rather he performs best when given consistent runs of games. He has become unhappy at Bayern due to game time being intermittent and his form has suffered. As a player he is not frustrating at all like Nani would be at times. If Ancelotti is dumb enough to lose him, and we don't go for him Pep will certainly aim to boot out Nolito for himLike Nani? Feck that then.
Pep left and was replaced with one who rarely rotates his wingers.I remember thinking he was one of the best wingers in the game up until last year. I seriously can't fathom how a player can technically not be good after such a season. A change of tactical set-up? Personnel? Probably wants to be a starter (which begs the question: why is he not?)? He was brilliant at providing width and was also a goal threat cutting in, would like to know what happened this season?
Bayern fans?
Like Nani? Feck that then.
His passing is quite bad. St least compared to the rest of our team. His movement without the ball is not great, either. His work rate declined heavily in the last few months. Seems to me to be extremely reliant on his happiness at the club.From your information about Douglas Costa he sounds like Willian (pretty average IMO), I can see Jose might interested to sign him. But I can't see that he has something that can solve our problems. I mean "crossing isn't even that good'' (pretty much one of our current problem) and "doesn't score a lot of goals''. I still remember we were linked with him when he was still with Gremio, I thought he was a no 10 and now he's a winger.
How good he is with his passing, movement/off ball and his work rate?
You can't honestly think that assists = good delivery into the box from wide positions...
People moaning about wingers who only beat fullbacks and cross all the time should remember how effective Valancia was as a wide man under Fergie in helping us dominate the league. Sometimes the rudimentary is most effective out wide to aid attacks Especially if you have brains in midfield and goals in your box.
His passing is quite bad. St least compared to the rest of our team. His movement without the ball is not great, either. His work rate declined heavily in the last few months. Seems to me to be extremely reliant on his happiness at the club.
@GailWynand
Our wingers have to cut inside instead of going all the way to the goalline. They are not supposed to give us that much width anymore. Our full backs do this now.
Pep left and was replaced with one who rarely rotates his wingers.
Id say good. Very good would be Beck or Dani Alves crossing level at whuch the crosser always picks put his man.Valencia was a very good crosser in 2009/2010 though.
You're really arguing just to argue, because that's not what I meant and you know it. In the case of Costa, I was specifically referring to his delivery into the box (a phrase almost exclusively associated with crossing ability), while with Mikhi I was saying his hugely impressive productivity in 2015/16 (manifested in both goals and assists) was what convinced me he'd be a good signing. Assists certainly don't just refer to delivery into the box; they can include anything from crosses, to through balls, to knock-downs, to passes across the face of goal after being put clean through by someone else's through ball (and there was a bunch of debate at the time about whether his assists included penalties won as well). If you can't distinguish between those two I really don't know what else to tell you.I never say " from wide position". I said that by calling it as insane numbers of assists is the same thing with calling his deliver into the box was better than any players what we had in 2015/2016.
He is unhappy. They still have Coman and the have their eyes on Brandt. If they do secure Brandt as some believe they will, selling an unhappy Costa would be sound business.He will have to though next year when the stalwarts retire/fade away - Why are Bayern so keen to sell?
@GailWynand
Our wingers have to cut inside instead of going all the way to the goalline. They are not supposed to give us that much width anymore. Our full backs do this now.
He is unhappy. They still have Coman and the have their eyes on Brandt. If they do secure Brandt as some believe they will, selling an unhappy Costa would be sound business.
You're really arguing just to argue, because that's not what I meant and you know it. In the case of Costa, I was specifically referring to his delivery into the box (a phrase almost exclusively associated with crossing ability), while with Mikhi I was saying his hugely impressive productivity in 2015/16 (manifested in both goals and assists) was what convinced me he'd be a good signing. Assists certainly don't just refer to delivery into the box; they can include anything from crosses, to through balls, to knock-downs, to passes across the face of goal after being put clean through by someone else's through ball (and there was a bunch of debate at the time about whether his assists included penalties won as well). If you can't distinguish between those two I really don't know what else to tell you.
Id say good. Very good would be Beck or Dani Alves crossing level at whuch the crosser always picks put his man.
Valencia was simply the master at the low whipped in cross from the by line, or the float to the far post hit consistently to the same area of the box. He was a master of the percentages and IMO Douglas Costa is similar and that's why he was effective under Pep. Because Mueller and Lewandowski were available, they simply ensured they always attacked the areas he would supply the ball too. If we add a few clinical scores to our ranks, Douglas Costa would be a similar weapon. Our midfield would simply feed him the ball to an isolates fullback, and he:d simply suplly constant balls into the box. People under estimate how effective it can be. Monaco this season have plundered so many goals in all competitions by mastering the art of the consistent early cross into the box.
So, he plays on the right? (He is a left-footed player so can cut-in from the right) - if it is a case of not being played in a system which suits his game, why the allegations against his attributes?