tjb
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2013
- Messages
- 3,547
The BBC pundits nailed it at half time. He spent far too much time out wide or trying to play as a striker instead of trying to get in pockets of space or coming deep to get the ball and pass from there. You're a playmaker. Get the ball, make some plays. Don't expect others to do it for you.
So many times the ball was with Fred or Matic and he wasn't even on the screen to be passed to.
Some people still think he's like Thomas Muller. Muller still gets himself involved with play...he can dribble and pass incisively, even though its not the prettiest. His dribbling allows him to be functional across the front 4, which allows him to use his tactical intelligence and movement more often. VDB isn't like Muller. The reason why people think others can't understand what he brings is that they don't actually understand what their prime example brings. It's like Xavi really. In his prime, a player who could consecutively make 5 yard passes were compared to him. It' s the reason Cleverley was highly touted. They didn't realise that the skills that made him effective were his first touch, agility ( which he used to change directions quickly), balance ( which allowed him to keep the ball in spite of heavy pressing) and vision. This allowed him to do his main role in constantly providing a passing option for his teammates, knowing fully well that he had the ability to keep and release the ball with ease. Similarly with Iniesta, compared to Lingard simply because he could move off the ball. Iniesta was the opposite of Xavi at Barcelona. He provided a steady outlet for teammates struggling to keep possession, essentially mopping up danger with his availability and moving the ball on to a position of the pitch that had less danger. Lingard was the furthest thing from that.
In essence, people tend to create an idea of a player being good or potentially being good because they do a few things similar to another player who was wildly successful. However, that doesn't mean that player is good or even performs the same role. Muller's movement is like Fernandes'. He moves into spaces that allow him to support other attackers, his agility and off the ball awareness allows him to operate anywhere in the attack. VDB simply stays mostly central and high. He doesn't support attacks, but rather runs into positions where he can score or provide the mhikitaryan assist directly. Like Mhikitaryan, his play, even in his best form, is not involved in the build up play enough to be useful for United.