crossy1686
career ending
Who feck starts instead? In case you haven't noticed we've been rolling out Mata and starting Lingard, that's how bad things have gotten.
I sometimes wonder why players dont go crazy and get 3-4 red cards so that the game gets forfeited at 3-0, rather than losing 7-0 or something.
He shouldn't, he's been bloody awful for ages. Lingard seemed to be doing a better job as a modern 10 against Norwich.
No he did not and he created chances for others and he also forced the keeper into a saveLingard literally gave the ball away in every attack. While Bruno is liable to doing the same thing as least he actually can produce moments of quality. The fact you think Lingard is the answer says it all tbh.
Both Lingard and Bruno were shite. Bruno is 10x the player though so get over it.No he did not and he created chances for others and he also forced the keeper into a save
Pogba is lazy as feck and doesn’t want to be here. No chance should he play over him.I’d be tempted to go 4-3-3 and have pogba, Fred and mctominay. Pogba can hold the ball better then Fernandes and his physicality will be useful. He can also drive with the ball a lot better then Fernandes when the space opens.
They’ll both be a liability in this game but one of them will be starting. Bruno gets caught in possession just as much.Pogba is lazy as feck and doesn’t want to be here. No chance should he play over him.
Because the shame of a forfeit with fines/scorn and long suspensions is far, far worse.
Bruno is a the better player. Lingard played better on the weekend. Maybe you should get over itBoth Lingard and Bruno were shite. Bruno is 10x the player though so get over it.
If he doesn’t start then who does? Considering we are already limited to probably Pogba and Matic. It’s easy to say get him out but you still have to put 11 players on the pitch.He shouldn't, he's been bloody awful for ages. Lingard seemed to be doing a better job as a modern 10 against Norwich.
Well….just to clarify the complex meaning, it means you know when you take a set-piece like a corner or free-kick, well when you kick the ball and if by you kicking that ball, a chance is created after you’ve kicked it, that means you’ve created a chance from a set-piece.Set-piece chances created? what how many corners he won us? What does that even mean?
Pretty sure he named a player who can play 10 in the post. Personally Mejbri should have played vs Norwich. We also have Mata tooIf he doesn’t start then who does? Considering we are already limited to probably Pogba and Matic. It’s easy to say get him out but you still have to put 11 players on the pitch.
That’s like me saying we can play Phil Jones there. It’s a stupid alternative.Pretty sure he named a player who can play 10 in the post
Its not if you actually watched performancesThat’s like me saying we can play Phil Jones there. It’s a stupid alternative.
Bruno on the wing oh hold on, it’s Maguire’s agent posting. Makes sense.I've said it before and I will say it again. Bruno is not a midfielder. Please play him on the wing. We keep rotating a promising young player and an out of form player. The former has done well with no expectations, but still not great. Give Bruno a run on the wing with Sancho on the other wing and CR7 in the #9. I guarantee that not only will CR7 get more service, but Bruno will score and assist more
Well it is considering the guy has barely played all season for us. If you watch Rooney’s performances, he’d be a good option too.Its not if you actually watched performances
Yet when he has hes been better than Bruno go figureWell it is considering the guy has barely played all season for us. If you watch Rooney’s performances, he’d be a good option too.
Are you watching with blindfolds mate? Lingard has done absolutely nothing for us this season.Yet when he has hes been better than Bruno go figure
In your opinion. If you think Bruno was the better player this weekend its you who was watching with blindfoldsAre you watching with blindfolds mate? Lingard has done absolutely nothing for us this season.
So you’ve used one single game against bottom of the league Norwich where no one played great (except Ronaldo) including Lingard to justify playing him instead of Bruno in the toughest game of the season. Yeah makes complete sense.In your opinion. If you think Bruno was the better player this weekend its you who was watching with blindfolds
So you’ve used one single game against bottom of the league Norwich where no one played great (except Ronaldo) including Lingard to justify playing him instead of Bruno in the toughest game of the season. Yeah makes complete sense.
Alright smart arse. I mean it the most pointless stat that means feck all.Well….just to clarify the complex meaning, it means you know when you take a set-piece like a corner or free-kick, well when you kick the ball and if by you kicking that ball, a chance is created after you’ve kicked it, that means you’ve created a chance from a set-piece.
I didn’t realise both Mct and Fred would still be out. But I still might start, Matic/ Pogba with Lingard in front.If he doesn’t start then who does? Considering we are already limited to probably Pogba and Matic. It’s easy to say get him out but you still have to put 11 players on the pitch.
We can all see Bruno has been in poor form. But to think choosing Lingard over him is a wise decision doesn’t really have any foundation. Saying Lingard wasn’t as shit as Bruno against Norwich is a poor justification to include him against Liverpool at anfield. This is a player who doesn’t want to be here and has played no part in virtually the whole season. Mata has been better than Lingard in recent cameos and even he isn’t a good choice.No Ive used Brunos form over the entire season and especially the last few months to justify the fact he should be dropped. And Lingard in the last game who was better than him, created chances and also almost scored should play ahead of him.
Fact is Bruno has been extremely bad past few months
Well that’s not what you meant because you really didn’t know what it meant. And it’s not really a pointless stat is it considering it’s quite a key way of winning a game. There’s a reason why Trent is no.1 because he’s good at it. So I’m afraid it doesn’t mean “feck all” and it isn’t “pointless” just because you struggle to grasp what it is.Alright smart arse. I mean it the most pointless stat that means feck all.
Thats not what Im saying. Im saying Lingard created chances and was a goal threat. You are chosing to see it as he was only a little better. We do not agree on that.We can all see Bruno has been in poor form. But to think choosing Lingard over him is a wise decision doesn’t really have any foundation. Saying Lingard wasn’t as shit as Bruno against Norwich is a poor justification to include him against Liverpool at anfield. This is a player who doesn’t want to be here and has played no part in virtually the whole season. Mata has been better than Lingard in recent cameos and even he isn’t a good choice.
The truth is Bruno is playing shit, but we don’t have great alternatives to justify dropping him.
You think a lot of yourself don’t you.Well that’s not what you meant because you really didn’t know what it meant. And it’s not really a pointless stat is it considering it’s quite a key way of winning a game. There’s a reason why Trent is no.1 because he’s good at it. So I’m afraid it doesn’t mean “feck all” and it isn’t “pointless” just because you struggle to grasp what it is.
I would say it’s more that I think little of your opinion based on your last few posts.You think a lot of yourself don’t you.
I couldn't give a feck what you think.I would say it’s more that I think little of your opinion based on your last few posts.
I feel honoured.I couldn't give a feck what you think.
Who the bloody hell would you play in midfield then? With no McFred in there?
Matic, Lingard and Mata?
Bruno on the wing oh hold on, it’s Maguire’s agent posting. Makes sense.