Do you really believe in ABU decisions, officials with agendas against us etc

On a tangent and I know the ticker thing was funny/a mistake/actually kind of true, but the BBC has been sensationalising their headlines about us for years and it feels a bit off to me for a national news broadcaster to be either a)clickbaiting or b)biased.
 
matherto said:
I think the officials are subpar, not biased.
Click to expand...

Pretty much. The whole set up needs an overhaul, especially VAR which is seemingly set up to protect the on-field ref from criticism as opposed to getting the correct decision. The funny thing is nobody would care if the initial decision was wrong if they got to the correct one in the end.
 
No, I don't. But I do believe the FA has a tendency put us down or make an example out of us whenever they get a chance. All the way back to the 50s when they wouldn't support the club's venture into Europe, Cantona and Rio's suspensions (deserved but harsh lengths), the FA Cup fiasco after the treble. The FA I believe is ABU, the match officials are mostly a case of incompetence and inconsistency.
 
Natener said:
No, I don't. But I do believe the FA has a tendency put us down or make an example out of us whenever they get a chance. All the way back to the 50s when they wouldn't support the club's venture into Europe, Cantona and Rio's suspensions (deserved but harsh lengths), the FA Cup fiasco after the treble. The FA I believe is ABU, the match officials are mostly a case of incompetence and inconsistency.
Click to expand...

Indeed. There's a fair few examples over the last 20+ years that show if two clubs/players commit the same offence United will almost always get the harsher punishment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.