Like who? We weren’t in for anyone else in the summer of 21 and many of us thought that Martial and Rashford would hit a new gear, but of course that didn’t happen. Whatever the reasons for their abysmal season in 21/22, it certainly wasn’t Ronaldo’s fault.
We were in, apparently, for Darwin and I endorsed that move, but he of course chose Liverpool. We would all loved to have brought in Haaland,, but there was no chance of that happening. There was some talk of Arnautovic, but I trust we agree it was daft talk. Unless Ronaldo in your view has fallen so far in your view that we’d be better off with Arnautovi.
We pay strikers to score goals, not to impress with kilometers run per game stats. If Ronaldo can no longer score goals, and we shall indeed see about that this season, he could run 20 km per game but it would be wasted effort. Truth is, he quite scored quite a few critical for us last season when virtually no one else could get anywhere near the goal. I still need to do the homework what our points total would have been if you subtracted out Ronaldo’s goal but it’s pretty obvious that we would have finished well below sixth place. I suppose your argument is that if we swapped out Ronaldo for any journeyman striker, say Danny Ings or Danny Welbeck, we would have done just as well as we actually did with Ronaldo — or perhaps even much better. Sorry, but I’m not having that.
I share the frustration that we‘re paying a fading GOAT massive wages, but we’re in this position we all agree because of idiotic executive management by a banker. Thankfully the banker is gone but we’re stuck with his legacy for a while. But on the specific point about Ronaldo, it really is too early in the season to declare him a completely spent force. It wasn’t that long ago that he was the only player on the squad worthy of the shirt.