Snow
Somewhere down the lane, a licky boom boom down
Rather use that 7m on a midfielder.
Rather use that 7m on a midfielder.
What does that even mean?
The new Saha?
A goal machine, when he's not croc. We already have one of those, he's called Michael Owen.
Surely the £7M release clause is a minimum fee? The bid must be at least £7M, doesn't mean they'd have to sell him for that though, does it?
you're venky by any chance?
Don't know what you mean, but its a serious question.
Are they obliged to sell him to the first team that offers £7M?
Or is it a case of United, say, want to sign him, he hands in a transfer request & we hand over the £7M, job done.
Doesn't sound very plausible to me.
The new Saha?
A goal machine, when he's not croc. We already have one of those, he's called Michael Owen.
Surely the £7M release clause is a minimum fee? The bid must be at least £7M, doesn't mean they'd have to sell him for that though, does it?
I reckon he'll go to Arsenal.
It baffles me how there can be such confusion over a release clause. Surely there is no other permutation of how it could possible work, other than what it is - which is that if a club bids the amount of the release clause, the players club have to accept the offer?
In what other way can it possibly make sense?
Many strikers have done very well for a season.
Newcastle could always sign Ba onto a bigger contract before anyone else can get to him, no? I have to say I think Ba is pretty good.
Maybe Chelsea should try him out, I could see him having fun in a front 3 with Sturridge and Mata, but I'd rather they didn't.
I don't see why he'd want to sign another contract with Newcastle now. If any club buys him in the summer he gets a £3.5m+ payoff and probably a wage increase and Champions League football; he's not gonna be turning that down in favour of a payrise on Tyneside.
I don't know, it might be worth it to Newcastle to offer the same amount to Ba to stay, they'd just have to spread the 3.5m out over his contract. If he's worth it to another to come in and offer 7m and good wages then I'd think Newcastle could afford to basically do the same thing, if the alternative is him leaving.
That's a good point yeah, they'd effectively be bidding for their own player
Would he want to stay though? He's doing well there, buy if Arsenal or Spurs came a'knocking I don't think it'd be too difficult a decision. Newcastle will always be a selling club.
Arsenal and Spurs are selling clubs?
According to the Press Association, Newcastle striker Demba Ba, 27, rejects the club's latest contract offer as they attempt to negotiate out the release clause contained in his initial deal.
Ba’ s future at Newcastle United has been a constant source of speculation since his advisers leaked the existence of a £7 million release clause 12 months ago, but he caused a stir on Tyneside this week when he openly admitted Arsenal were “attractive” to him.
Newcastle are far from happy with the Senegal international, who made his comments on French television, and Pardew will discuss with managing director Derek Llambias what action to take.
Ba also criticised the team’s tactics and, as the interview was not sanctioned by the club’s press department, he is in breach of contract and could be fined two weeks wages, about £90,000.
Stupid move by newcastle to put that clause in surely? but i suppose they were always aware - and probably prepared for it.
Drogba mark 2 ? , Good move for him.